Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Microsoft Flight Simulator
Flight Simulation 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

97%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
165 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
74 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
98 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
55 FPS
10.4ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,444
Your CPU 35,287
Graphics Card
Required 27,967
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 57 76 98
1440p QHD 74 78 103 133
1080p Full HD 92 96 128 165

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 96
1920x1080 Low 165
1920x1080 Medium 128
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Low 133
2560x1440 Medium 103
2560x1440 Ultra 74
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Low 98
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 Ultra 55

Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a benchmark profile that places this combination in the upper tier of tested systems for Microsoft Flight Simulator, ranking 833rd out of 3,714 total combos. Measured frame rates show a system that excels at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires modest settings adjustments to maintain smooth gameplay. The data set includes average, minimum, and maximum FPS for Medium presets across all three resolutions, with High, Low, and Ultra presets reported as averages only. Based on a 60 FPS playability threshold, this hardware combination clears that mark at every resolution tested, though the margin narrows considerably at 2160p on the most demanding presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces its highest frame rates. The Low preset averages 165 FPS, which is the absolute peak measured across the entire test matrix. Moving to Medium drops the average to 128 FPS, with a minimum of 109 FPS and a maximum of 147 FPS — the tightest min/max spread recorded at this resolution. High settings average 96 FPS, while the Ultra preset remains above the playability threshold at 92 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the scaling is consistent but slightly steeper. Low settings average 133 FPS, a 32 FPS reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium averages 103 FPS with a minimum of 88 FPS and a maximum of 119 FPS. High settings produce 78 FPS on average, and Ultra delivers 74 FPS. None of the 1440p presets drop below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating strong headroom even at the highest quality level.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens noticeably. Low settings average 98 FPS, which is still comfortably above the threshold. Medium averages 76 FPS, with a minimum of 65 FPS and a maximum of 88 FPS — the minimum here is only 5 FPS above the playability cutoff, making this the closest call in the entire dataset. High settings drop to 57 FPS on average, falling below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra averages 55 FPS, the lowest figure recorded for this combination. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is 19 FPS, which is the largest single-step drop observed at any resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 833 out of 3,714 tested combinations places this system in the top 22.4 percent of all configurations evaluated for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This percentile position reflects the balance between the i7-12700K’s processing throughput and the RTX 4070’s rendering capability.

Relative to the CPU’s overall benchmark standing, the i7-12700K sits at the 84th percentile against all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 35,287. The GPU achieves the 81st percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 37,648. The fact that both components sit within three percentile points of each other indicates a well-matched pairing — neither component is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other, which typically translates to consistent scaling across resolutions and presets.

The in-game rank of 833 is lower than the individual component percentiles might suggest, which indicates that Microsoft Flight Simulator places demands on the system that are not fully captured by synthetic benchmarks. The game’s simulation-heavy workload, with its complex flight models and dynamic weather systems, creates bottlenecks that generic CPU and GPU benchmarks do not always replicate.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 92 FPS. This leaves 32 FPS of headroom above the threshold, making Ultra the recommended choice for players who prioritize visual fidelity at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, Ultra again qualifies as the best playable setting, averaging 74 FPS. The margin above the threshold is 14 FPS, which is sufficient for stable gameplay but with less buffer than at 1080p. Players seeking additional safety margin could step down to High at 78 FPS, though the difference is marginal.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. Ultra averages 55 FPS and High averages 57 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 76 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 65 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above the playability cutoff. The 65 FPS minimum means even the lowest frame dip remains above 60 FPS, providing a consistent experience at 4K Medium.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the i7-12700K’s nearest rivals are clustered within a narrow performance band. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, which is 0.1 percent higher than the 12700K’s 35,287. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35,365, a 0.2 percent delta. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35,403, 0.3 percent higher, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35,428, 0.4 percent higher. All four rivals deliver essentially identical synthetic performance, meaning any of them would produce frame rates nearly indistinguishable from the i7-12700K in this game.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070’s nearest rivals show a similar clustering. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37,628, which is 0.1 percent higher than the RTX 4070’s 37,648 — a negligible difference. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37,507, 0.4 percent lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135, which is 1.3 percent higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37,157, 1.3 percent lower. The RTX 4080 Mobile is the only rival that exceeds the RTX 4070 by more than one percent, suggesting it might deliver slightly higher frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios, though the delta remains small.

For players considering alternatives, the Intel Core i5-13600T and the Intel Core i7-12700KF are the closest CPU substitutes, with performance deltas under one percent. On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 offers nearly identical performance at 0.4 percent lower scores, while the RTX 4080 Mobile sits slightly above the RTX 4070.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions reveals which component dominates in Microsoft Flight Simulator at each setting level. Comparing Low preset performance across resolutions shows a clear pattern: 1080p Low averages 165 FPS, 1440p Low averages 133 FPS, and 4K Low averages 98 FPS. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is approximately 19 percent, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is approximately 26 percent. This accelerating decline indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly stressed as pixel count rises, even at the least demanding settings.

At Medium settings, the progression is 128 FPS at 1080p, 103 FPS at 1440p, and 76 FPS at 4K. The 1080p-to-1440p drop is about 20 percent, and the 1440p-to-4K drop is about 26 percent. The similar percentage reductions across Low and Medium presets suggest that the GPU is the primary constraint at all resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to keep the pipeline fed.

The Ultra preset tells a different story. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 92 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 74 FPS, a 20 percent reduction. At 4K Ultra, it falls to 55 FPS, a 26 percent reduction from 1440p. The consistency of these percentage drops across all presets indicates that the RTX 4070 is the limiting factor throughout, with the i7-12700K maintaining adequate frame delivery even at the highest settings.

However, the fact that 4K High (57 FPS) and 4K Ultra (55 FPS) are only 2 FPS apart — while 4K Medium (76 FPS) is 19 FPS higher than High — suggests that the transition from Medium to High introduces a significant GPU workload increase, while the step from High to Ultra adds comparatively little. This pattern points to a GPU that hits a rendering bottleneck at 4K High, rather than a CPU limitation.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum FPS this combination can achieve in Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The highest measured average is 165 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next highest is 133 FPS at 2560x1440 with Low settings, followed by 128 FPS at 1080p Medium.

Q: Can this system run the game at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 55, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is Medium, which averages 76 FPS with a minimum of 65 FPS.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings. The lowest recorded minimum is 65 FPS at 3840x2160 Medium. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 88 FPS, and at 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum is 109 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its nearest GPU rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37,628, which is 0.1 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37,507, 0.4 percent lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135, 1.3 percent higher.

Q: Which CPU rivals offer nearly identical performance to the i7-12700K?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, which is 0.1 percent higher than the i7-12700K’s 35,287. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35,365, 0.2 percent higher, and the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35,403, 0.3 percent higher. All three are within a fraction of a percent.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary constraint. Frame rate drops from 1080p to 1440p and from 1440p to 4K are consistent across Low, Medium, and Ultra presets, with reductions of approximately 19-20 percent and 26 percent respectively. This consistent scaling pattern across all quality levels points to the RTX 4070 as the bottleneck, with the i7-12700K providing adequate processing throughput.

The Verdict

This PC can run Microsoft Flight Simulator at all three tested resolutions, though the setting ceiling varies. At 1920x1080, every preset — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 92 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets also remain playable, with Ultra averaging 74 FPS and providing the best visual quality while staying above the cutoff. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium achieve playable frame rates, with Medium at 76 FPS being the best setting that maintains 60 FPS or higher. The 4K Ultra preset averages 55 FPS and 4K High averages 57 FPS, both below the threshold, meaning players targeting 4K must accept Medium settings or lower to maintain smooth gameplay. The system’s overall rank of 833rd out of 3,714 combos confirms it as a strong performer, though the 4K Ultra gap indicates that the RTX 4070, while capable, is not sufficient for maximum fidelity at the highest resolution in this simulation title.