Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Microsoft Flight Simulator
Flight Simulation 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
162 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
93 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
132 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
73 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
97 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
10.4ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,444
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,967
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 57 76 97
1440p QHD 73 76 102 132
1080p Full HD 93 96 130 162

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 96
1920x1080 Low 162
1920x1080 Medium 130
1920x1080 Ultra 93
2560x1440 High 76
2560x1440 Low 132
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 Ultra 73
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Low 97
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a robust Microsoft Flight Simulator experience, with the data showing that this combination is capable of high frame rates across most resolutions and settings. The measured FPS results indicate a system that is well-suited for the flight simulator, though 4K Ultra settings will push it to its limits.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally strong, with average frame rates ranging from 92.5 FPS at Ultra to 161.8 FPS at Low. The High preset achieves 95.7 FPS, while Medium reaches 129.7 FPS. All 1080p configurations comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold, making this resolution a smooth experience regardless of visual fidelity.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results remain impressive. The Ultra preset delivers 73.4 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold, while High hits 75.7 FPS. Medium produces 102 FPS, and Low reaches 131.8 FPS. The data shows a consistent scaling pattern, with each step down in settings providing a meaningful boost in frame rate. The gap between Ultra and Medium is 28.6 FPS, which is substantial for those seeking higher refresh rates or headroom for complex scenes.

At 3840x2160, the performance picture changes noticeably. The Ultra preset drops to 52.1 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings achieve 57.4 FPS, still slightly under the mark. However, Medium delivers 76.1 FPS, and Low reaches 97 FPS, both of which are comfortably playable. This indicates that 4K gaming requires a compromise in settings to maintain smooth performance, but the system has sufficient headroom to handle 4K at medium fidelity.

The average FPS figures across all tested configurations demonstrate a well-balanced pairing. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1016 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3302, helps maintain frame rates in a simulation that is heavily dependent on CPU physics and world-generation calculations. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth provide ample rasterization power for the simulator’s dense scenery rendering.

FAQ

Q: Is this PC capable of running Microsoft Flight Simulator at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. The data shows the average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 52.1, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Users wanting 4K will need to use Medium settings (76.1 FPS) or Low settings (97 FPS) for a smooth experience.

Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains over 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves 73.4 FPS, which is above the threshold. This means all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to similar processors in the benchmark database?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799 and ranks in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, scores 27896, which is only 0.3% higher, indicating near-identical overall performance.

Q: How does the GPU stack up against other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648 and ranks in the 81st percentile among all GPUs. It performs within 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, which scores 38135, showing it is a highly competitive mid-range to high-end card.

Q: What is the performance gap between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 92.5, while at 3840x2160 Ultra, it is 52.1. This represents a 40.4 FPS drop, or approximately 43.7%, when moving from 1080p to 4K at the highest preset.

Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS threshold at any 4K preset?

A: Yes. Both Medium (76.1 FPS) and Low (97 FPS) presets at 3840x2160 exceed the 60 FPS threshold. High (57.4 FPS) and Ultra (52.1 FPS) do not.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3714 tested combinations in the benchmark database, this Intel Core i5-12600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing ranks 930th specifically for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places the combo in the top 25% of all tested systems for this particular game, indicating a strong but not elite performance tier.

The rank reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU. The i5-12600KF’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, provide solid multi-threaded throughput, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391. The RTX 4070’s 5888 shading units and 46 RT cores deliver strong rasterization and ray tracing capabilities. When combined, they produce a system that handles the simulator’s demands well at mainstream resolutions but shows limitations at the extreme 4K Ultra setting.

The percentile rankings reinforce this assessment: the CPU is in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The combo’s game-specific rank of 930 out of 3714 suggests that this configuration is slightly better suited to Microsoft Flight Simulator than the average of its component parts, likely due to the CPU’s strong single-core performance, which is critical for flight simulation physics.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the Intel Core i9-10900K, which has an average score of 27872 and is 0.3% slower than the i5-12600KF. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, 0.3% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887, 0.3% slower. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, also 0.3% slower. These four processors would deliver nearly identical multi-threaded performance in games, meaning users upgrading from any of these to the i5-12600KF would see negligible improvements in CPU-bound scenarios.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628, a mere 0.1% below the RTX 4070. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, 0.4% lower, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, 1.3% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher. These deltas are all within a tight 1.4% band, indicating that these graphics cards would produce very similar frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator. However, it is important to note that the RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and a 192-bit memory bus, which may offer better texture handling in memory-intensive scenes compared to some rivals with smaller memory pools.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS are Ultra, which achieves an average of 92.5 FPS. This provides the highest visual fidelity while still delivering a significant margin above the playability threshold.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also qualifies as the best settings, with an average of 73.4 FPS. This allows users to run the simulator at maximum quality while maintaining smooth frame rates, with roughly 13 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Medium, which produces an average of 76.1 FPS. While Ultra (52.1 FPS) and High (57.4 FPS) both fall short of the 60 FPS threshold, Medium offers both visual quality and performance, making it the optimal choice for 4K displays. Low settings (97 FPS) are available for those prioritizing higher frame rates over fidelity.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-12600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination is fully capable of running Microsoft Flight Simulator at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with all settings presets playable. At 1920x1080, even the Ultra preset delivers 92.5 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra achieves 73.4 FPS, maintaining a comfortable margin for complex scenery and weather effects.

At 3840x2160, the system requires a settings compromise. The verdict data shows that Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium being the recommended best setting at 76.1 FPS. High (57.4 FPS) and Ultra (52.1 FPS) fall short of the 60 FPS threshold, meaning users with 4K displays should stick to Medium for a smooth experience. Overall, this combo is a strong performer for Microsoft Flight Simulator, particularly at 1440p and below, and remains viable at 4K with adjusted settings.