Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 58 | 61 | 81 | 105 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 83 | 110 | 142 |
| 1080p Full HD | 98 | 103 | 137 | 176 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a highly capable Microsoft Flight Simulator experience, with benchmark data showing that the combination clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution under most presets. At 1080p and 1440p, the combo can run the game at Ultra settings with average frame rates of 98 and 79 FPS respectively, while 4K gaming is viable at High settings with an average of 61 FPS.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming with this CPU and GPU combo?
A: At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which achieves an average of 61 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution fall below the playable threshold with 58 FPS average.
Q: Can this system run Microsoft Flight Simulator at Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: Yes, at 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 79 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The measured data confirms all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377, placing it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100. It trails the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 by 1.2% and leads the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile by 2%.
Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the combo achieves an average of 137 FPS, with a measured minimum of 116 FPS and maximum of 157 FPS, providing a very smooth experience.
Q: How does the i5-12400F rank among all tested CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i5-12400F sits in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19039. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with a near-identical score of 19047, showing a 0% delta.
Q: What is the lowest playable setting at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves an average of 105 FPS, while the Medium preset delivers 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS. All three presets — Low, Medium, and High — are playable at 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU in this combo each have close rivals based on average benchmark scores. For the Intel Core i5-12400F, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is the most direct match, with an average score of 19047 versus the Intel chip's 19039 — a 0% difference. The Intel Core 3 201E also performs nearly identically with a score of 19056, showing a -0.1% delta. The Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X are also within a fraction of a percent, scoring 18982 and 18979 respectively, each showing a 0.3% delta from the i5-12400F.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070's average benchmark score of 40377 places it alongside several professional-class AMD cards. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 is the closest match at 40318, just 0.1% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, a 0.8% difference, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, putting it 1.2% ahead of the RTX 5070. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile completes the nearest rival group with a score of 39568, representing a 2% delta.
For gaming purposes, these rival components would deliver very similar performance profiles in Microsoft Flight Simulator. The CPU's nearest rivals all fall within a 0.3% performance band, meaning users upgrading from or considering these alternatives would see virtually identical CPU-bound frame rates. The GPU rivals show a slightly wider spread of up to 2%, but the practical difference in frame rates at any given resolution and preset would be minimal, with the RTX 5070 maintaining its position among this cluster of comparable hardware.
How This Combo Ranks
In the comprehensive database of tested hardware combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 729th out of 3714 total combos for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places the system in the top 19.6% of all tested configurations, indicating strong overall performance for this specific title.
The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU components. The i5-12400F's 73rd percentile standing among CPUs and the RTX 5070's 82nd percentile among GPUs combine to produce a system that handles the flight simulator's demanding rendering workload effectively. The benchmark results show that this combo outperforms the vast majority of tested systems, with the rank suggesting that roughly 2985 other combinations deliver lower frame rates in this game.
Given that the data is measured rather than estimated, this ranking provides a reliable indicator of real-world performance. The system's position in the upper quintile of tested combos means users can expect smooth gameplay across most resolutions and settings, though the 4K Ultra preset remains slightly out of reach at 58 FPS average.
The Verdict
This PC configuration can definitively run Microsoft Flight Simulator, with playable performance confirmed at all three tested resolutions. The verdict by resolution shows that 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 allow for Ultra settings, while 3840x2160 supports up to High settings while maintaining the 60 FPS playable threshold.
At 1080p, the system delivers an average of 98 FPS on Ultra settings, providing a substantial margin above the playable threshold. The 1440p resolution sees Ultra settings at 79 FPS average, still comfortably playable. For 4K gaming, the High preset achieves 61 FPS average, just clearing the 60 FPS threshold, while the Ultra preset falls short at 58 FPS.
The measured frame rates show consistent performance across the board. At 1080p Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 116, ensuring no noticeable dips below the playable threshold. Similarly, at 1440p Medium settings, the minimum is 94 FPS, and at 4K Medium settings, the minimum is 69 FPS, all maintaining smooth gameplay. The data confirms that this combo is well-suited for flight simulation enthusiasts seeking high-fidelity visuals without sacrificing playability.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions and presets in Microsoft Flight Simulator. The Intel Core i5-12400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides a solid foundation for the game's simulation logic, while the RTX 5070 handles the increasingly demanding graphics workloads as resolution increases.
At 1080p, the system shows significant headroom in GPU performance. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at this resolution results in a frame rate drop from 176 FPS to 98 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the primary scaling factor as visual complexity increases. The CPU's 12380 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 1680 single-core score provide ample processing power for the game's simulation aspects, allowing the GPU to operate without being bottlenecked at lower resolutions.
Moving to 1440p, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The Ultra preset at this resolution delivers 79 FPS, compared to 98 FPS at 1080p Ultra, showing a 19.4% performance decrease from the resolution increase. The scaling from Medium to Ultra at 1440p shows a drop from 110 FPS to 79 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU is the limiting factor as settings increase.
At 4K resolution, the GPU's dominance is clear. The High preset achieves 61 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 58 FPS, showing that the RTX 5070 is working near its limits at this resolution. The CPU's contribution remains consistent, but the frame rates are increasingly determined by the GPU's 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The data shows that across all resolutions, the GPU is the more significant component for determining playable settings, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid becoming the primary bottleneck.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, achieving an average of 61 FPS. The Medium preset offers more headroom at 81 FPS average, with a minimum of 69 FPS and maximum of 94 FPS. The Low preset delivers 105 FPS average, and the Ultra preset falls below the threshold at 58 FPS.
For 2560x1440, Ultra settings are playable with an average of 79 FPS. The High preset achieves 83 FPS, Medium delivers 110 FPS with a minimum of 94 FPS, and Low reaches 142 FPS. Users seeking maximum visual quality at this resolution can confidently select the Ultra preset while maintaining smooth performance.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 98 FPS, making it the recommended choice for maximum quality. The High preset achieves 103 FPS, Medium reaches 137 FPS with a minimum of 116 FPS, and Low provides 176 FPS for the highest possible frame rates. The data indicates that 1080p Ultra provides an excellent balance of visual fidelity and performance, with nearly 40 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold.