Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 54 | 51 | 74 | 93 |
| 1440p QHD | 73 | 74 | 98 | 124 |
| 1080p Full HD | 89 | 91 | 125 | 155 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combo delivers a playable Microsoft Flight Simulator experience at 4K, but it truly shines at 1440p and 1080p where it clears 60 FPS even on the highest preset. Benchmark results indicate that at 3840x2160, the system is limited to Medium settings for a smooth 74 FPS average, while High and Ultra presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the pairing achieves 72.8 FPS on Ultra, and at 1920x1080 it reaches 89.2 FPS on Ultra, making this a capable configuration for high-refresh monitors at lower resolutions.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming with this CPU/GPU combo?
A: At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which produces an average of 74 FPS. High and Ultra presets drop to 51.4 FPS and 54 FPS respectively, both below the playable threshold.
Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 72.8 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This resolution is the sweet spot for maximizing visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943, placing it just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14901E and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core 5 211E. It sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs tested.
Q: What is the GPU's performance ranking relative to other graphics cards?
A: The RTX 3080 holds the 68th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P106-100, scores 23249, which is 0.3% higher, indicating very close synthetic performance.
Q: Does the game run better at 1080p Low or 4K Medium?
A: The 1080p Low preset produces 155.4 FPS, while 4K Medium yields 74 FPS. The lower resolution offers more than double the frame rate, but 4K Medium still provides a smooth experience with higher visual detail.
Q: What is the overall rank of this combo among all tested configurations?
A: This specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 1068 out of 3714 total combinations tested for Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the top 29% of all systems benchmarked.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in component importance depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strong single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor, as frame rates scale dramatically with preset changes. The Ryzen 7 9700X's single-thread score of 1280 in 3DMark and 2211 in Cinebench R23 indicates substantial headroom, but the RTX 3080 is not fully saturated at this resolution. This is evident from the 66.2 FPS jump between Low (155.4 FPS) and Ultra (89.2 FPS) settings, showing that the GPU has spare capacity even at maximum quality.
Moving to 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The frame rate drop from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra is 16.4 FPS, while the drop from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra is 18.8 FPS. This progressive decline indicates that the RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are increasingly taxed as pixel count rises. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the primary drivers of performance at higher resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The gap between Medium (74 FPS) and High (51.4 FPS) is 22.6 FPS, showing that the RTX 3080 struggles with the most demanding settings at 4K. The CPU's role diminishes here; even with the 9700X's 8 cores and 16 threads, the bottleneck is firmly on the graphics side. The data shows that the CPU's performance headroom is only fully utilized at 1080p, while the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading units determine outcomes at 1440p and 4K.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the optimal configuration is the Medium preset, which achieves an average of 74 FPS. This is the only preset above 60 FPS at 4K, as High (51.4 FPS) and Ultra (54 FPS) both fall short of the playable threshold. The 20 FPS difference between Medium and High highlights the steep performance cost of higher quality textures and effects at this resolution.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 72.8 FPS. This resolution allows the full visual experience without compromising smoothness. The progression from Low (124 FPS) to Medium (98.4 FPS) to High (73.9 FPS) shows a gradual decline, but Ultra remains well above the 60 FPS target, making it the recommended setting.
At 1920x1080, Ultra is also the best setting, producing 89.2 FPS. This is the most forgiving resolution for the combo, with even the most demanding preset leaving substantial margin above 60 FPS. The Low preset reaches 155.4 FPS, which is ideal for competitive or high-refresh scenarios, but Ultra provides the best balance of fidelity and performance for most users.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Microsoft Flight Simulator, with the qualification that 4K users must moderate their expectations. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low (93.4 FPS) and Medium (74 FPS), but High and Ultra are not viable for smooth gameplay. The verdict data confirms that Medium is the best 4K setting, offering a comfortable 14 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 2560x1440, the system is fully capable across all presets. The verdict lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable, with Ultra delivering 72.8 FPS. This makes 1440p the ideal resolution for this combo, providing the best balance between visual quality and performance headroom. The 12.8 FPS buffer above 60 FPS on Ultra ensures a stable experience even during complex flight scenarios.
For 1920x1080, the verdict is unambiguous: all settings are playable, and Ultra achieves 89.2 FPS. This gives users a 29.2 FPS margin over the playable threshold, allowing for potential frame rate dips without dropping below 60 FPS. The system is overqualified for 1080p gaming, making it suitable for high-refresh displays or users who prefer maximum visual settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates show a clear hierarchy: Low leads with 93.4 FPS, followed by Medium at 74 FPS, Ultra at 54 FPS, and High trailing at 51.4 FPS. The inverted relationship between High and Ultra is notable—Ultra outperforms High by 2.6 FPS despite being the more demanding preset, suggesting potential driver optimization or measurement variance in this range.
The 2560x1440 results demonstrate more consistent scaling. Low produces 124 FPS, Medium drops to 98.4 FPS, High reaches 73.9 FPS, and Ultra maintains 72.8 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is minimal at just 1.1 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset's additional features have negligible performance impact at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are the highest across all settings. Low achieves 155.4 FPS, Medium delivers 124.7 FPS, High reaches 91.3 FPS, and Ultra produces 89.2 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is only 2.1 FPS, suggesting that the most demanding preset is well-optimized for this resolution. The overall pattern shows diminishing returns as settings increase, with the largest performance hits occurring between Low and Medium at every resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
This AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1068 out of 3714 tested configurations for Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the upper 29% of all systems. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking provides strong single-threaded performance essential for flight simulation physics, while the GPU's 68th percentile ensures adequate graphics throughput.
The CPU's nearest rivals—the Intel Core i9-14901E, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Intel Core 5 211E, and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132—all score within 0.4% of the 9700X, indicating that this processor is competitively positioned among modern chips. The GPU's closest competitors, including the NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon RX 6600M, are within 0.4% of the RTX 3080's score, showing tight clustering in this performance tier.
Given the mid-pack GPU ranking and top-quartile CPU ranking, the overall combo rank of 1068 suggests that the RTX 3080 is the limiting factor for this game. The data indicates that a stronger GPU would likely push this combo higher in the rankings, while the CPU provides ample headroom for future graphics upgrades. For users with this exact configuration, the measured FPS results confirm that 1440p Ultra is the most demanding setting that maintains smooth gameplay.