Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 71 | 76 | 99 | 127 |
| 1440p QHD | 100 | 102 | 141 | 179 |
| 1080p Full HD | 126 | 132 | 177 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers a decisive performance tier for Microsoft Flight Simulator, with measured data showing that every preset at every tested resolution clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 4K Ultra, the combo still produces an average of 70.5 FPS, indicating substantial headroom even under maximum graphical load. The benchmark results position this pairing as a top-tier option for the flight simulator, ranking 160th out of 3,714 tested combinations, placing it in the top percentile of all possible configurations.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 70.5 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by a comfortable margin.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 100 FPS, making it the highest quality option that remains well above the 60 FPS target.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40,081, placing it within 0.6% of the Intel Core i9-13905H (40,313) and just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048).
Q: What GPU performance tier does the RTX 5080 occupy relative to its rivals?
A: The RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56,083 puts it 2.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698), while trailing the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57,367) by 2.2%.
Q: Is the 1080p experience limited by the CPU or GPU?
A: At 1920x1080, the system reaches 213.7 FPS on Low settings, but Ultra still achieves 125.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 41% performance reduction, indicating the GPU becomes the primary constraint as graphical load increases.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at all tested resolutions?
A: Yes. Every resolution and preset combination in the measured data exceeds 60 FPS, with the lowest recorded average being 70.5 FPS at 4K Ultra.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 7700 and RTX 5080 across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates what happens when the GPU has abundant headroom: Low settings produce 213.7 FPS, but the jump to Medium drops performance to 176.8 FPS, a 17% reduction. This pattern continues with High at 132.4 FPS and Ultra at 125.9 FPS. The relatively modest gap between High and Ultra at 1080p (5%) suggests the CPU is beginning to assert its influence at these high frame rates, as the GPU has less time per frame to complete its work.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The Low preset yields 178.6 FPS, which is 16% lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium drops to 141 FPS, High to 101.7 FPS, and Ultra to exactly 100 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p represents a 44% performance reduction, compared to 41% at 1080p. This widening gap indicates that the RTX 5080 is becoming the limiting factor as pixel count increases, though the Ryzen 7 7700 continues to feed frames efficiently.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's dominance is unmistakable. Low settings produce 127.3 FPS, which is less than 60% of the 1080p Low result. Medium drops to 99.4 FPS, High to 75.6 FPS, and Ultra to 70.5 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K narrows to just 6.7%, while the gap between Low and Ultra expands to 44.6%. This data shows that the RTX 5080's rendering workload at 4K leaves little room for the CPU to matter, as the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the overwhelming constraint. The Ryzen 7 7700's strong single-thread performance (1,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2,525 in Geekbench single-core) ensures it never bottlenecks the GPU, but the measured results clearly indicate that resolution scaling is governed entirely by the graphics card.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the optimal choice, delivering a measured average of 125.9 FPS. This provides more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold while maintaining maximum visual fidelity. The Low preset at 213.7 FPS offers no practical benefit for standard 60 Hz displays, and even High at 132.4 FPS fails to match Ultra's combination of quality and frame rate.
At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best settings preset with an average of 100 FPS. This represents a 20.5% reduction from the 1080p Ultra result, but still leaves substantial margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Players seeking maximum smoothness might consider High at 101.7 FPS, but the difference is negligible (1.7%), making Ultra the clear recommendation for image quality.
The 3840x2160 resolution presents the most demanding scenario, yet Ultra still achieves 70.5 FPS on average. This is 17.5% above the 60 FPS playability threshold, providing a comfortable cushion for complex scenes or dense scenery. The High preset at 75.6 FPS offers a 7.2% performance improvement, but the visual tradeoff may not justify it given that Ultra already maintains a playable frame rate. All four presets at 4K — Low at 127.3 FPS, Medium at 99.4 FPS, High at 75.6 FPS, and Ultra at 70.5 FPS — exceed the playability threshold, so the choice comes down to visual preference versus frame rate headroom.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the Ryzen 7 7700's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40,048 in average benchmarks, which is just 0.1% lower than the 7700's 40,081. This negligible difference means the two CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator, particularly at resolutions where the GPU dominates. The Intel Core 5 221E (40,144, -0.2% delta) and AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40,246, -0.4% delta) are similarly close, all within a fraction of a percent of the 7700's performance. The Intel Core i9-13905H (40,313, -0.6% delta) is the farthest among the listed rivals, yet the 0.6% gap would translate to less than one frame per second in most game scenarios.
For the GPU, the RTX 5080's nearest rivals present a more varied picture. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367, which is 2.2% higher than the RTX 5080's 56,083. This margin could yield approximately 1.5 to 2 additional FPS at 4K Ultra in this game, though both cards would remain well above the 60 FPS threshold. The AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757, 0.6% lower) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, 0.7% lower) are nearly identical to the RTX 5080 in synthetic benchmarks, suggesting they would produce very similar frame rates in practice. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828, 2.3% lower) shows the largest gap among the listed rivals, but even this 2.3% difference would only amount to roughly 1.6 FPS at 4K Ultra settings, keeping performance comfortably above the playability threshold.
The Verdict
This PC configuration can absolutely run Microsoft Flight Simulator, and the data indicates it does so with exceptional margin across all tested scenarios. At 1920x1080, the verdict is unambiguous: every preset from Low (213.7 FPS) through Ultra (125.9 FPS) clears the 60 FPS threshold by at least 110%. The 1440p results are equally strong, with Ultra at 100 FPS providing a 66.7% margin over the playability threshold. Even at 3840x2160, the most demanding configuration tested, the Ultra preset maintains 70.5 FPS on average, which is 17.5% above the 60 FPS target.
The verdictByResolution data confirms that all three resolutions — 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 — list High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable settings. The best settings per resolution are Ultra at every tier, with average FPS of 70.5, 100, and 125.9 respectively. This means users can enable maximum graphical fidelity without sacrificing playability. The combination of the Ryzen 7 7700's strong multi-threaded performance (18,760 in Cinebench R23 multicore) and the RTX 5080's substantial rendering capabilities (56.28 TFLOPS FP32, 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth) ensures that neither component becomes a bottleneck at any tested resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination ranks 160th out of 3,714 tested configurations in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places the combo in the 95.7th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms approximately 3,554 other combinations. The ranking reflects the balanced nature of this pairing: the Ryzen 7 7700 sits in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, and the RTX 5080 also holds the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Neither component drags the other down, and the measured FPS data confirms that this equilibrium translates into consistent high performance.
The rank of 160 out of 3,714 is particularly notable given the demanding nature of Microsoft Flight Simulator, which stresses both CPU and GPU heavily due to its complex scenery rendering and physics simulation. Systems ranked above this combo likely feature newer or more expensive hardware, but the practical difference in gameplay is minimal at the tested resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the combo's 70.5 FPS average provides a comfortable experience, and the 100 FPS at 1440p Ultra ensures smooth motion even during fast descents or dense urban flyovers. The data suggests that this configuration occupies a sweet spot in the benchmark hierarchy, offering near-top-tier performance without requiring the absolute highest-end components available.