Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 35 | 44 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 43 | 58 | 77 |
| 1080p Full HD | 55 | 58 | 76 | 93 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a mid-range combination that can run Microsoft Flight Simulator, but the experience is heavily dependent on resolution and settings. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, offers 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and lands in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Together, this combo ranks 2843rd out of 3714 tested combinations for this specific title, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer, it remains viable for certain configurations. The data below breaks down exactly where this system stands.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that keeps the average frame rate at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 76.1 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this resolution, offering a solid margin above the 60 FPS threshold. While High settings produce 58.4 FPS and Ultra drops to 55.3 FPS, neither reaches the playable threshold, so Medium is the clear choice for smooth gameplay at 1080p.
Moving to 2560x1440, the options narrow considerably. The only preset that clears 60 FPS is Low, which achieves an average of 77 FPS. This is a significant jump in performance compared to Medium, which falls to 58.2 FPS, just shy of the target. At this resolution, users must accept the visual compromises of Low settings to maintain fluid motion.
At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. Even Low only reaches 54.3 FPS on average, below the 60 FPS threshold. High, Medium, and Ultra produce 35.4, 44.2, and 28.5 FPS respectively, confirming that this combo is not suited for 4K gaming in this title. The verdict data lists no playable settings for this resolution, so the practical ceiling is 1440p with Low presets.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 1080p with high settings?
A: No. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average frame rate is 58.4 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings are required for a consistent experience, delivering 76.1 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: The best playable resolution is 2560x1440, but only with Low settings, which yields 77 FPS. At 1920x1080, Medium settings provide a higher visual quality at 76.1 FPS, making 1080p the more balanced choice overall.
Q: Does the Arc B580 bottleneck the Ryzen 5 7600X in this game?
A: The data does not isolate bottleneck behavior, but the GPU's performance percentiles are lower than the CPU's. The GPU sits in the 68th percentile while the CPU is in the 79th percentile, suggesting the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 54.3 FPS on average, below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings drop to 28.5 FPS, making 4K unplayable for this title.
Q: How does this combo compare to other tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 2843rd out of 3714 tested combinations for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, reflecting its limitations at higher resolutions and presets.
Q: What frame rate can I expect with Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 44.3 FPS. This is well below the 60 FPS target, so Ultra presets are not recommended at this resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings levels, with average frame rates provided for each configuration. No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded, so the analysis relies solely on averages.
At 1920x1080, the performance scales predictably. Low settings deliver the highest average at 93.3 FPS, followed by Medium at 76.1 FPS, High at 58.4 FPS, and Ultra at 55.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 17.2 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 3.1 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at the top end.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly. Low settings achieve 77 FPS, Medium falls to 58.2 FPS, High reaches 42.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 44.3 FPS. Interestingly, High and Ultra are nearly identical, with only a 1.6 FPS difference, suggesting that the GPU hits a performance wall around this range regardless of the extra visual load.
At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly below the playable threshold. Low settings produce 54.3 FPS, Medium drops to 44.2 FPS, High reaches 35.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28.5 FPS. The performance degradation from Low to Ultra is a steep 25.8 FPS, making 4K a non-starter for this combination.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X has an average benchmark score of 27,636. This is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and the Intel Core i5-12600K, both scoring 27,578 with a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores slightly higher at 27,712 (delta of -0.3%), while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27,535 (delta of 0.4%). In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver essentially the same frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator, meaning the choice between them should be based on platform and price rather than gaming performance.
For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23,021. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23,061 (delta -0.2%), followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22,895 (delta 0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23,172 (delta -0.7%), and the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23,249 (delta -1%). The inclusion of the RTX 3080 in this group is notable, as it suggests that in this specific benchmark, the Arc B580 performs on par with a high-end card from a previous generation, though real-world gaming results may vary. For this title, swapping to any of these GPUs would yield similar FPS numbers, with the RTX 3080 being the closest match in terms of average score.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Microsoft Flight Simulator, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B580 holds a rank of 2843 out of 3714 combos. This places it in the 76th percentile of all tested systems (calculated by subtracting the rank from the total and dividing). However, the official percentile fields for the individual components tell a different story: the CPU is in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The combo's lower overall rank compared to the CPU's percentile suggests that the GPU drags down the system's standing in this specific game, which is heavily dependent on graphics processing.
The rank indicates that a majority of tested systems outperform this combo in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This is expected for a mid-range GPU paired with a strong CPU, as the game's heavy graphical load favors higher-end GPUs. The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can maintain playable frame rates with medium settings, but it lacks the headroom for higher resolutions or more demanding presets.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Microsoft Flight Simulator? The answer depends entirely on the resolution and settings you target. At 1920x1080, the system is playable with Low and Medium settings, with Medium being the best playable preset at 76.1 FPS. High and Ultra settings fall below the 60 FPS threshold, so they are not recommended. At 2560x1440, only Low settings clear the bar, achieving 77 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fail to reach 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, no settings are playable, with the best case being Low at 54.3 FPS.
The verdict data confirms this: for 1440p, the best playable settings are Low with an average of 77 FPS; for 1080p, the best playable settings are Medium with an average of 76.1 FPS. There is no playable configuration at 4K. In practical terms, this combo is a solid 1080p machine for Microsoft Flight Simulator, capable of delivering smooth frame rates with moderate visual quality. For 1440p, you must sacrifice visual fidelity to Low settings. The system ranks in the lower half of all tested combos, so expect it to struggle with the game's most demanding scenarios. If you own a 1080p monitor, this setup will serve you well; if you are aiming for 1440p or higher, consider a stronger GPU. The Ryzen 5 7600X provides ample CPU headroom, but the Arc B580 is the limiting factor in this pairing.