Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 60 | 81 | 105 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 86 | 112 | 142 |
| 1080p Full HD | 100 | 105 | 139 | 175 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers a strong showing in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with benchmark data indicating that 60 FPS is achievable at every tested resolution, although the preset ceiling varies. At 4K, the combo tops out at Medium settings with an average of 81.2 FPS, while at 1440p and 1080p, it clears the threshold even at the demanding Ultra preset. This analysis breaks down the component roles, optimal settings, and how this pairing compares to other tested hardware.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming with this combo?
A: The data shows Medium is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 3840x2160, delivering an average of 81.2 FPS. High and Ultra presets both fall slightly short of the 60 FPS target, with averages of 59.8 and 59.9 FPS respectively.
Q: Can this system run the game at Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset produces an average of 77.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data confirms that High, Low, Medium, and Ultra are all playable at this resolution.
Q: How many FPS can I expect at 1080p with Low settings?
A: The benchmark results show an average of 175.2 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo across all tested configurations.
Q: Is the RTX 5070 a high-performing GPU in general terms?
A: The GPU holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40377. Its closest performance rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 580, which scores 40318, a delta of just 0.1 percent.
Q: What is the CPU's relative standing compared to other processors?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600 sits in the 78th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26324. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, scores 26402, which is only 0.3 percent higher.
Q: Does the game run smoothly at 4K with High settings?
A: No, according to the measured data. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 59.8, which is marginally below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict lists only Low and Medium as playable settings at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern of GPU dominance in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with the graphics card being the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom to feed frames, evidenced by the wide spread between presets: Low settings yield 175.2 FPS while Ultra still manages 100 FPS. This 75.2 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p indicates that the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting, as the CPU can maintain high frame rates even when graphical load is low.
Moving to 1440p, the scaling remains consistent but the GPU strain becomes more apparent. The Low preset drops to 141.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 77.1 FPS. The performance delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 64.8 FPS, slightly narrower than at 1080p, showing that the GPU's workload is starting to limit the upper bound of performance. The CPU, however, still has sufficient capacity to keep frame rates well above the playable threshold across all presets.
At 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor. The Low preset delivers 104.5 FPS, but High and Ultra presets both collapse to around 60 FPS (59.8 and 59.9 respectively). The Medium preset sits in between at 81.2 FPS. This dramatic drop from Low to Medium and the plateau at High/Ultra indicates that the RTX 5070's compute resources are saturated at higher graphical loads. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rate is constrained by the GPU's ability to render the scene rather than the CPU's ability to process game logic.
The data suggests that for flight simulation enthusiasts targeting high visual fidelity, the GPU is the component to prioritize. At 4K, even the powerful RTX 5070 cannot sustain 60 FPS at High or Ultra presets, while the CPU's performance headroom appears sufficient at all tested resolutions. For those with 1080p or 1440p displays, both components work in balance, but the GPU will still be the first component to bottleneck if you push settings higher.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Medium, which produces 81.2 FPS. The High preset averages 59.8 FPS and Ultra averages 59.9 FPS, both just shy of the playable threshold. Low settings deliver 104.5 FPS, but Medium offers a substantial visual upgrade while still providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 77.1 FPS. This is the highest quality setting tested and it clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 17.1 FPS buffer. Lower presets also perform well, with High at 85.5 FPS, Medium at 112 FPS, and Low at 141.9 FPS, but Ultra provides the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.
At 1920x1080, Ultra is again the optimal preset, achieving an average of 100 FPS. This is a full 40 FPS above the playable threshold, giving ample headroom for demanding scenes. The other presets are also viable, with High at 105.2 FPS, Medium at 138.7 FPS, and Low at 175.2 FPS, but there is no reason to drop below Ultra given the performance margin.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 689th out of 3714 tested combos for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places it in the top 18.5 percent of all configurations tested, indicating a strong overall performance level. The rank reflects the synergy between the CPU and GPU in this particular game, accounting for both component capabilities and how they interact under the game's specific workload.
The 689th rank out of 3714 combos means the system outperforms the vast majority of tested hardware configurations. This is consistent with the measured frame rates, which show 60 FPS or better at all resolutions with appropriate preset selection. The ranking also suggests that while this combo is not at the absolute top tier of performance, it provides a solid foundation for high-refresh-rate play at 1080p and 1440p, and respectable 4K performance with adjusted settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals data, several CPUs and GPUs would produce similar performance in this system. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX has an average benchmark score of 26274, which is 0.2 percent lower than the Ryzen 5 7600's 26324. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, a 0.4 percent deficit, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, a 0.5 percent gap. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, which is 0.3 percent higher than the 7600, making it a slightly faster alternative. These CPUs would all deliver nearly identical frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with differences well within the margin of measurement error.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon Pro 580 is the closest rival with a score of 40318 versus the RTX 5070's 40377, a delta of just 0.1 percent. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, 0.8 percent lower, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, 2 percent lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, which is 1.2 percent higher than the RTX 5070. Swapping the RTX 5070 for any of these cards would result in nearly identical gaming performance, though the professional-oriented nature of these alternatives may lack some gaming-specific features.
The Verdict
This PC can run Microsoft Flight Simulator with playable performance at all tested resolutions, provided you select the appropriate preset. At 1920x1080, the system handles Ultra settings with an average of 100 FPS, making it well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 2560x1440 resolution also supports Ultra at 77.1 FPS, offering a good balance of visual quality and smoothness for 1440p displays.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The system achieves playable performance at Medium settings with 81.2 FPS, but High and Ultra presets fall just below the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 59.8 and 59.9 FPS respectively. For 4K users, Medium settings provide the best experience that stays above 60 FPS, though the frame rates at High and Ultra are so close to the threshold that many players might find them acceptable with adaptive sync technologies. The data shows this combo is a capable 1080p and 1440p machine for Microsoft Flight Simulator, with respectable 4K performance when settings are managed appropriately.