Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Microsoft Flight Simulator
Flight Simulation 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
173 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
101 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
144 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
81 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
9.6ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,444
Your CPU 20,468
Graphics Card
Required 27,967
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 63 81 101
1440p QHD 81 82 113 144
1080p Full HD 101 104 135 173

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 104
1920x1080 Low 173
1920x1080 Medium 135
1920x1080 Ultra 101
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Low 144
2560x1440 Medium 113
2560x1440 Ultra 81
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Low 101
3840x2160 Medium 81
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers a robust experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with measured data indicating that every tested resolution and preset configuration clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The pairing shows a clear performance hierarchy, scaling predictably from 1080p to 4K, and the data positions this combo as a capable choice for the flight simulator.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces its highest frame rates. The Low preset yields an average of 173.4 FPS, which drops to 135.4 FPS on Medium, 104.3 FPS on High, and 101.4 FPS on Ultra. The gap between High and Ultra is narrow at just 2.9 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns beyond the High preset at this resolution. Even the most demanding setting stays well above the 60 FPS threshold, leaving substantial headroom for demanding scenarios like dense urban areas or heavy weather effects.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a more pronounced scaling curve. The Low preset averages 144 FPS, a 16.9% reduction from 1080p. Medium drops to 112.9 FPS, High falls to 82 FPS, and Ultra settles at 81.2 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 1440p is minimal at 0.8 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset does not impose a significant additional load over High at this resolution. The jump from Medium to High is substantial at 30.9 FPS, making High the clear performance inflection point.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers playable results across all settings. The Low preset averages 100.9 FPS, Medium drops to 81.3 FPS, and High averages 63.2 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 60.1 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: Low falls by 43.1 FPS, Medium by 31.6 FPS, High by 18.8 FPS, and Ultra by 21.1 FPS. The data shows that 4K Ultra is the boundary condition for this combo, with the average sitting only 0.1 FPS above the playable mark.

The frame rate deltas between presets are not uniform across resolutions. At 1080p, the spread from Low to Ultra is 72 FPS; at 1440p, it is 62.8 FPS; and at 4K, it is 40.8 FPS. This compression at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant constraint as pixel count rises, reducing the relative impact of preset changes.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, which scores 20454 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 20468, a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20425, also 0.2% behind, while the AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 7713 score 20422 and 20363 respectively, with deltas of 0.2% and 0.5%. These four processors would behave nearly identically in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with performance differences too small to produce measurable FPS changes.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5070's nearest rivals show similar parity. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318 against the RTX 5070's 40377, a 0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, 0.8% behind, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, 2% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, which is 1.2% ahead of the RTX 5070. In practical terms, swapping the RTX 5070 for any of these GPUs would yield FPS differences within a rounding error of the measured values, meaning the overall verdict across resolutions and presets would remain unchanged.

The combination of the Ryzen 5 5600 with its nearest CPU rivals and the RTX 5070 with its nearest GPU rivals would produce a system that sits within 2% of the measured performance envelope. For users considering alternative hardware, these parts represent the closest performance equivalents without stepping up or down in the benchmark hierarchy.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 60.1 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by just 0.1 FPS. This leaves almost no headroom for frame rate dips.

Q: What is the best preset to use at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 81.2 FPS, which is only 0.8 FPS lower than the High preset's 82 FPS. Both settings are playable, but Ultra provides the best visual quality with negligible performance cost.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At the Low preset, the drop is from 173.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 100.9 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 72.5 FPS. At Ultra, the drop is from 101.4 FPS to 60.1 FPS, a reduction of 41.3 FPS.

Q: Is the High preset at 4K smoother than Ultra?

A: Yes, the High preset at 3840x2160 averages 63.2 FPS compared to 60.1 FPS on Ultra, a difference of 3.1 FPS. Both are playable, but High offers more margin above the threshold.

Q: Does the Low preset at 1080p exceed 144 FPS?

A: Yes, the Low preset at 1920x1080 averages 173.4 FPS, which is well above 144 FPS and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: What is the slowest measured configuration?

A: The slowest is 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, averaging 60.1 FPS. This is the only configuration where the average sits close to the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The Verdict

The data shows that this combination can run Microsoft Flight Simulator at all tested resolutions and presets above 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the threshold with significant margin, with the lowest average being 101.4 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 81.2 FPS and Low reaching 144 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system maintains playability across the board, with Ultra averaging 60.1 FPS, High at 63.2 FPS, Medium at 81.3 FPS, and Low at 100.9 FPS.

The verdict by resolution confirms that the best settings for each resolution are the Ultra preset, with average FPS of 60.1 at 4K, 81.2 at 1440p, and 101.4 at 1080p. For users prioritizing frame rate stability over visual fidelity, the High preset at 4K offers a 3.1 FPS improvement over Ultra, while at 1440p and 1080p, the difference between High and Ultra is negligible. This combo is fully capable of running the game at maximum settings across all tested resolutions, though 4K Ultra leaves minimal headroom for scene complexity variations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling data reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibility across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rate is highest and most sensitive to preset changes, with the Low to Ultra spread reaching 72 FPS. This suggests the CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU, allowing the graphics card to fully express its performance. The narrow 2.9 FPS gap between High and Ultra at 1080p indicates that the GPU is not yet saturated, and the CPU is keeping pace.

At 2560x1440, the performance scaling becomes steeper between Medium and High, with a 30.9 FPS drop. The Low to Ultra spread narrows to 62.8 FPS, showing that the GPU is beginning to take on more load. The near-identical results between High and Ultra (82 vs 81.2 FPS) suggest that at this resolution, the Ultra preset's additional effects are not heavily taxing the GPU, and the CPU remains sufficient.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Low to Ultra spread compresses to 40.8 FPS, and the average frame rates drop sharply compared to 1440p. The CPU's role diminishes as pixel throughput takes priority, and the 60.1 FPS at Ultra indicates the GPU is working at near capacity. The Ryzen 5 5600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides enough processing power to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 5070 even at 4K, but the headroom is clearly reduced.

Across all resolutions, the data shows a progressive shift from CPU-influenced performance at 1080p to GPU-bound performance at 4K. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18309 and single-core score of 2584 indicate solid processing capability, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 29137 positions it as the primary driver of frame rates at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination ranks 694th out of 3714 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the top 18.7% of all systems tested. The rank reflects the balance between the Ryzen 5 5600's 74th percentile standing among all CPUs and the RTX 5070's 82nd percentile among all GPUs. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20468 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 40377 both sit comfortably above their respective medians.

The ranking indicates that while this combo is not at the absolute top of the performance spectrum, it outperforms more than four out of five tested configurations in this game. The measured FPS data corroborates this, showing playable performance at every resolution and preset. The 694th rank out of 3714 combos suggests that systems with higher-ranked CPUs or GPUs would deliver higher frame rates, particularly at 4K Ultra where the 60.1 FPS average leaves little margin. However, the combination's consistency across all settings and resolutions makes it a dependable choice for Microsoft Flight Simulator, with the data confirming that no configuration tested falls below the playable threshold.