Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 41 | 47 | 66 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 63 | 72 | 102 |
| 1080p Full HD | 64 | 86 | 98 | 139 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 2976th out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. That places this pairing in the lower third of the database, which is a meaningful signal for anyone expecting high-refresh competitive play. The rank is not catastrophic, but it is far from the top tier. The recorded data shows a system that can clear the 60 FPS playability threshold at 1080p and 1440p, but only under specific settings, and at 4K it struggles outside of Low.
The CPU sits at the 88th percentile against all processors, which indicates strong general compute capability. The GPU, however, sits at the 66th percentile against all graphics cards, and that imbalance is central to understanding this combo. The processor is not the bottleneck in most scenarios. The graphics card is. The combo rank in this game, at roughly the 80th percentile of tested pairings, reflects that GPU ceiling more than the CPU's headroom. In practical terms, the measured frame rates align with what the GPU percentile suggests: playable but not exceptional.
The average benchmark score for the CPU is 44466, and the GPU averages 21035. When those are combined in this specific title, the result is a system that handles 1080p well, manages 1440p with compromises, and only touches 4K playability on the lowest preset. The rank of 2976 out of 3714 means a large portion of tested combos outperform it, but the frame data shows that the performance is consistent and predictable across resolutions.
CPU and GPU Roles
At 1920x1080, the CPU has enough headroom that the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The Ultra X9 388H, with its 16 cores and 16 threads, scores 18911 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2200.5 in single-core. Those numbers are more than sufficient for Lockdown Protocol at this resolution. The RTX 5050, with 2560 shading units and 80 tensor cores, determines the outcome. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 139 FPS average. At Medium, it drops to 98 FPS. At High, 86 FPS. At Ultra, 64 FPS. The scaling between Low and Ultra is roughly a 54% reduction in frame rate, which is a GPU-bound pattern. The CPU is not the constraint here.
At 2560x1440, the GPU load increases and the CPU role shrinks further. The average frame rates are 102 FPS at Low, 72 FPS at Medium, 63 FPS at High, and 47 FPS at Ultra. The step from 1080p to 1440p at High settings costs about 23 FPS, from 86 to 63. That is a 27% drop from a 78% increase in pixel count, which indicates that the GPU is scaling as expected under resolution load. The CPU continues to provide stable minimums where they are recorded, such as the 61 FPS minimum at Medium settings in 1440p, which suggests the processor is not introducing frame-time instability.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is decisively the limiting component. The RTX 5050 produces 66 FPS average at Low, 47 FPS at Medium, 41 FPS at High, and 31 FPS at Ultra. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, with 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, are taxed heavily at 4K. The CPU's role at this resolution is minimal. Even the strongest processor could not overcome the GPU's raw throughput limits here. The data shows that the RTX 5050 is the component to upgrade first if higher resolutions or higher presets are the goal.
The pattern across all three resolutions is clear. The CPU is never the primary constraint in Lockdown Protocol. The GPU dictates the playable settings at each resolution. At 1080p, the GPU allows Ultra at 64 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra falls to 47 FPS, and High becomes the best playable preset at 63 FPS. At 4K, only Low clears the 60 FPS threshold. The processor's strong single-thread score of 2200.5 in Cinebench R23 and its 88th percentile ranking mean it can feed the GPU adequately even at lower resolutions where CPU load is typically higher.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the combo records an average of 64 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. It is the only resolution where Ultra is listed as playable. The database verdict lists Ultra among the playable settings at 1080p.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?
A: High is the best playable setting at 1440p, with an average of 63 FPS. Medium runs at 72 FPS and Low at 102 FPS, but High offers the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 1440p drops to 47 FPS, which is below the playable line.
Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?
A: Only on Low settings. At 3840x2160 Low, the average is 66 FPS. Medium drops to 47 FPS, High to 41 FPS, and Ultra to 31 FPS. The verdict lists Low as the only playable setting at 4K.
Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals in raw benchmark score?
A: The RTX 5050 averages 21035 in the database. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237, 1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, which is 1.6% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, 1.6% higher. The differences are small enough that these cards would behave similarly in most scenarios.
Q: Does the CPU hold back the GPU in this game?
A: The data does not indicate any CPU bottleneck. The Ultra X9 388H ranks in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, scores within 0.2%. The frame rate scaling across resolutions and presets follows a GPU-bound pattern, with the processor providing stable minimums where recorded, such as the 84 FPS minimum at 1080p Medium.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: Low averages 139 FPS, Ultra averages 64 FPS. That is a 75 FPS difference, or a 54% reduction. The same comparison at 1440p shows Low at 102 FPS versus Ultra at 47 FPS, a 55 FPS difference. At 4K, Low averages 66 FPS and Ultra averages 31 FPS, a 35 FPS difference.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals in the database are all within a narrow band of average benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, which is 0.2% higher than the Ultra X9 388H's 44466. The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, 0.4% lower. The Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44240, 0.5% lower. Any of these processors would behave nearly identically in Lockdown Protocol. The differences are within the margin of measurement noise, and none would change the playable settings at any resolution.
The GPU's nearest rivals show a similar clustering. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is 0.6% higher, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is 1.6% lower, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.6% higher. The RTX 5050's average benchmark score of 21035 sits in the middle of this group. In practical terms, swapping to any of these cards would produce frame rates within a few percent of the RTX 5050 in Lockdown Protocol. The playable settings at each resolution would remain the same.
For a builder considering alternatives, the data suggests that the CPU side has ample headroom. The Ultra X9 388H is competitive with desktop-class processors like the Core i5-13600, which scores 44240. The GPU side is more constrained. The RTX 5050's nearest rivals are a mix of older mobile parts and mid-range desktop cards, which reinforces that this GPU is positioned at the lower end of the current generation. The 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs means most graphics cards in the database are faster.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the recorded data shows the following averages. Low settings produce 139 FPS average. Medium produces 98 FPS average, with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS. High produces 86 FPS average. Ultra produces 64 FPS average. All four presets at 1080p clear the 60 FPS playability threshold. The minimum recorded at 1080p Medium, 84 FPS, indicates that frame pacing remains stable even during demanding scenes.
At 2560x1440, Low settings produce 102 FPS average. Medium produces 72 FPS average, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS. High produces 63 FPS average. Ultra produces 47 FPS average. The playable settings at 1440p are High, Low, and Medium. The 61 FPS minimum at Medium confirms that even the lower bound of the playable range stays above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, Low settings produce 66 FPS average. Medium produces 47 FPS average, with a minimum of 40 FPS and a maximum of 54 FPS. High produces 41 FPS average. Ultra produces 31 FPS average. Only Low is playable at 4K. The Medium preset's maximum of 54 FPS does not reach the 60 FPS threshold, and its minimum of 40 FPS shows significant frame dips. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 19 FPS, which is the largest jump between adjacent presets at any resolution.
The overall pattern across the measured data is consistent. Each resolution step from 1080p to 1440p to 4K reduces the average FPS by roughly 25 to 35% at the same settings. The RTX 5050's 8 GB memory capacity and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but 4K Ultra demands more than the card can deliver.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol. The question is not whether it runs, but at what settings and resolution. At 1920x1080, every preset clears 60 FPS. Ultra runs at 64 FPS average, which is above the playability threshold. This is the resolution where the combo performs best, and the data shows that 1080p Ultra is fully viable.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High, Medium, and Low. High averages 63 FPS, which is the best visual setting that still clears the threshold. Ultra drops to 47 FPS and is not recommended. The 1440p experience is solid for High settings, with the 61 FPS minimum at Medium providing a safety margin for demanding scenes.
At 3840x2160, only Low is playable, with an average of 66 FPS. Medium falls to 47 FPS, High to 41 FPS, and Ultra to 31 FPS. The verdict lists Low as the best playable setting at 4K. For anyone with a 4K display, the expectation should be set to Low and adjusted downward if frame rate drops are an issue.
The verdict by resolution is clear. 1920x1080 supports High, Low, Medium, and Ultra. 2560x1440 supports High, Low, and Medium. 3840x2160 supports Low only. The CPU, which ranks 88th percentile, is not the limiting factor at any resolution. The RTX 5050, at the 66th percentile, is the component that defines the playable envelope. For 1080p gaming, this is a capable pairing. For 1440p, it is workable with settings management. For 4K, it is limited to the lowest preset.