Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
239 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
111 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
81 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
113 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
53 FPS
6.8ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 40,518
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 53 70 80 113
1440p QHD 81 109 124 175
1080p Full HD 111 148 170 239

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 148
1920x1080 Low 239
1920x1080 Medium 170
1920x1080 Ultra 111
2560x1440 High 109
2560x1440 Low 175
2560x1440 Medium 124
2560x1440 Ultra 81
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Low 113
3840x2160 Medium 80
3840x2160 Ultra 53

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a potent mobile combination for Lockdown Protocol, an FPS title. The recorded data shows that this system handles the game with high frame rates across all tested resolutions, though the most demanding settings at 4K require some compromise. This analysis breaks down the optimal settings, component roles, and expected performance figures based solely on the database measurements.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, with a recorded average of 70 FPS. Pushing to Ultra drops the average to 53 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows that Medium runs at 80 FPS and Low at 113 FPS, but High offers the best visual fidelity while still clearing the playable mark comfortably.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the system can handle the maximum preset. Ultra settings deliver an average of 81 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target. This makes Ultra the clear choice for the best visual experience at this resolution. For reference, High averages 109 FPS, Medium 124 FPS, and Low 175 FPS, so there is ample headroom to prioritize graphics quality.

For 1920x1080 (1080p), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is again Ultra, with an average of 111 FPS. This is the optimal setting for full graphical fidelity. Lower presets run even faster: High at 148 FPS, Medium at 170 FPS, and Low at 239 FPS, but the system's performance at Ultra makes those compromises unnecessary for standard 60Hz or even high-refresh-rate monitors.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU has more influence at lower resolutions. The scaling between resolutions and presets in the recorded data makes this relationship clear.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates show significant variation with preset changes, from 113 FPS on Low to 53 FPS on Ultra. This is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance, where the rendering load at 4K pixel counts puts most of the strain on the RTX 4080. The CPU's role is secondary, as it must simply feed the GPU with enough data to maintain these frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with higher absolute numbers. The jump from 175 FPS on Low to 81 FPS on Ultra represents a 54% drop, which still points to the GPU as the primary limiter. The CPU, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H with 16 cores and 16 threads, has enough headroom to keep up with the GPU's output at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the picture shifts slightly. The Low preset reaches 239 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that can expose CPU limitations in less demanding scenes. However, the Ultra preset still averages 111 FPS, suggesting that the GPU remains the main constraint when visual effects are maxed out. At lower settings, the CPU becomes more relevant, but the data does not indicate any CPU bottleneck severe enough to prevent high frame rates.

The overall trend is that the RTX 4080's performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, while the Core Ultra X7 368H provides sufficient processing power to avoid holding the system back. For players targeting high refresh rates at 1080p with Low settings, the CPU's single-thread performance, as reflected in its benchmark scores, is adequate for the task.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. The recorded average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 70 FPS.

Q: What is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 81 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS mark. All other presets at this resolution also exceed 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54209, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 2.6% higher.

Q: What is the expected performance at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The database shows an average of 170 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 195 FPS. This is well above the playable threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 4K?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary factor at 4K. Frame rates drop from 113 FPS on Low to 53 FPS on Ultra, a pattern consistent with GPU-bound rendering. The CPU's role is to keep up with the GPU, which it does without issue.

Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS target at all tested resolutions?

A: No. At 3840x2160, Ultra settings fall short at 53 FPS. However, at 2560x1440 and 1920x1080, all presets, including Ultra, average above 60 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms that High, Medium, and Low are playable at 4K, while all presets are playable at 1440p and 1080p.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 40518. The nearest rivals in the database offer nearly identical performance. The Intel Core 7 253PE scores 40557, which is 0.1% faster. The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585, which is 0.2% faster. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431, which is 0.2% slower. The Intel Xeon 6507P also scores 40426, which is 0.2% slower. In practical terms, these deltas are negligible, so any of these CPUs would behave similarly in Lockdown Protocol, providing comparable frame pacing and minimal bottleneck risk.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 54247. Its nearest rivals are extremely close in performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, which is 0.1% lower, meaning it would deliver virtually identical frame rates. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher, translating to a marginal FPS advantage. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 2.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, which is 2.7% higher. These differences are small enough that all four alternatives would produce similar playable experiences, with the AMD options offering a slight edge in raw benchmark terms but no dramatic shift in the settings recommendations above.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the data records the following averages: Low preset runs at 113 FPS, Medium at 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS, High at 70 FPS, and Ultra at 53 FPS. Only Medium provides min/max data, but the averages are sufficient to gauge performance tiers. The gap between High and Ultra is 17 FPS, showing a steep cost for the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, the measurements show: Low averages 175 FPS, Medium averages 124 FPS with a minimum of 106 FPS and maximum of 143 FPS, High averages 109 FPS, and Ultra averages 81 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only one that stays above 60 FPS while offering the full visual feature set, and it does so with a comfortable margin.

At 1920x1080, the recorded numbers are: Low averages 239 FPS, Medium averages 170 FPS with a minimum of 144 FPS and maximum of 195 FPS, High averages 148 FPS, and Ultra averages 111 FPS. The Medium min/max range of 144 FPS to 195 FPS indicates consistent frame delivery, and even the Ultra preset, which has no min/max data, averages well above the playable threshold.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol with strong performance. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best setting being High at an average of 70 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 4K because it dips to 53 FPS. At 2560x1440, all settings including Ultra are playable, with Ultra averaging 81 FPS as the best choice. At 1920x1080, all settings are playable, and Ultra averages 111 FPS, making it the recommended preset.

The data confirms that the RTX 4080 is the driving force behind these results, while the Core Ultra X7 368H provides ample support. For a smooth 60 FPS experience, users should stick to High at 4K or use Ultra at 1440p and 1080p. The system's ranking of 1202 out of 3714 tested combos places it well within the capable tier for this game. In short, this is a high-performance mobile setup that handles Lockdown Protocol without major compromises, except for the most demanding 4K Ultra preset.