Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 82 | 94 | 133 |
| 1440p QHD | 96 | 127 | 146 | 206 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 174 | 199 | 280 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
Lockdown Protocol is a fast-paced FPS that demands high frame rates, and the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers exactly that across all tested resolutions. The measured data shows this setup not only clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at every preset but often doubles it, making it a strong contender for high-refresh-rate gaming. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing provides a smooth and responsive experience, with the only real trade-off appearing at 4K Ultra settings, where frame rates dip closer to the baseline.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance scaling across resolutions and quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally fast. With Low settings, the average frame rate hits 280 FPS. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 199 FPS, with a minimum of 169 FPS and a maximum of 229 FPS. High settings yield an average of 174 FPS, while Ultra settings still manage a robust 130 FPS average. This resolution is clearly where the CPU and GPU combo has the most headroom, pushing frame rates far beyond what most displays can even show.
At 2560x1440, performance remains very high, showing only a modest decline from 1080p. The Low preset averages 206 FPS. Medium settings deliver an average of 146 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 124 FPS and a maximum of 168 FPS. High settings produce an average of 127 FPS, and Ultra settings still hold a strong 96 FPS average. The data suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining frame rates well above 100 FPS on most presets.
At 3840x2160, the demand on the GPU becomes apparent, but the system still performs admirably. The Low preset averages 133 FPS. Medium settings see the average drop to 94 FPS, with the minimum and maximum recorded at 80 FPS and 108 FPS, respectively. High settings average 82 FPS. Ultra is the only setting that approaches the playable threshold, with an average of 62 FPS. While all presets are technically playable, the 62 FPS average at 4K Ultra is the only configuration that leaves little margin for drops below 60 FPS during intense scenes.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K resolution?
A: Yes. The data shows all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra) are listed as playable at 3840x2160. The average frame rates range from 133 FPS on Low to 62 FPS on Ultra, so you can play at 4K with the highest settings, though it will be closer to the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, as it delivers an average of 96 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and provides the highest visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?
A: The performance drop is significant but not crippling. For example, on the Ultra preset, the average frame rate falls from 130 FPS at 1920x1080 to 96 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 62 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a roughly 52% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K.
Q: Is the frame rate stable, or are there major dips?
A: The available data for Medium settings shows a solid frame time consistency. At 1920x1080, the range is from 169 FPS minimum to 229 FPS maximum. At 2560x1440, it spans from 124 FPS to 168 FPS. At 3840x2160, the range is 80 FPS to 108 FPS. The differences between min and max are moderate, suggesting generally stable performance.
Q: Does the game run smoothly on High settings at 4K?
A: Yes, the High preset at 3840x2160 produces an average of 82 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold, providing a smooth experience with a good balance between visual quality and performance.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for this game?
A: The combination ranks at 685 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the top 20% of all configurations, indicating that it is a high-performing setup for this specific title.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results show a clear shift in bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset reaching 280 FPS. This suggests that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU, and the system is likely not limited by the processor at this resolution. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (from 280 FPS down to 130 FPS) indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on more work as visual complexity increases, but the CPU is still keeping up.
As resolution moves to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a more pronounced drop compared to 1080p. The average FPS on Low falls from 280 to 206, and on Ultra, it falls from 130 to 96. This scaling suggests that the GPU is becoming the more significant factor, as the increased pixel count adds load to the render pipeline. The CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, with its 24 cores and high boost clock, is still providing ample performance, but the GPU, the Radeon RX 7900 XT, is now the primary driver of frame rate differences between presets.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's role is dominant. The average frame rates drop to between 62 and 133 FPS depending on the preset, which is a substantial decline from the lower resolutions. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K (133 FPS vs. 62 FPS) is stark, showing that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors at this resolution. The CPU's role diminishes here, as it is more than capable of handling the game logic and draw calls while the GPU struggles to fill the 8.3 million pixels on screen. The data points to the RX 7900 XT's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth being fully utilized at 4K, while the CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and high single-core performance are sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck.
How This Combo Ranks
In the overall ranking for Lockdown Protocol, this specific configuration of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT sits at rank 685 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the 82nd percentile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of other hardware pairings for this game. The rank is a composite measure of the system's ability to push high frame rates across all resolutions and settings.
Given the measured FPS data, this high rank is expected. The system clears the 60 FPS threshold with ease in nearly every scenario, only coming close at 4K Ultra. The fact that it can deliver over 200 FPS at 1080p Low and over 130 FPS at 1080p Ultra demonstrates a level of performance that places it firmly in the upper echelon of gaming PCs. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 55th percentile ranking among all GPUs contribute to this strong overall position, showing that while the GPU is not top-tier, the combination is highly effective.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the components can help identify other systems that would behave similarly in Lockdown Protocol. For the CPU, the closest performer is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, which has an average benchmark score just 0.2% lower than the 290K Plus. This means a system with a 285K and the same RX 7900 XT would produce nearly identical frame rates. Other close alternatives include the AMD EPYC 4584PX (1.1% lower score) and the AMD EPYC 9135 (1.2% lower score). These server-class chips would offer similar gaming performance, though their platform features differ. The AMD EPYC 7F72 scores 1.3% higher, so it would be a marginal upgrade in CPU-bound scenarios.
On the GPU side, the nearest rivals are surprising, as they are not high-end desktop cards. The AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile both have average scores within 0.5% of the RX 7900 XT, though these are integrated and mobile parts respectively. This suggests that in synthetic benchmarks, the RX 7900 XT's score is average for its class. More relevantly, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT has a score that is 1.5% higher, indicating it would offer a slight performance uplift in-game. The AMD Radeon RX 570X is 0.9% lower, meaning it would be a slight step down. These GPU comparisons are less clear-cut for gaming, but they provide a reference point for relative compute capability.
The Verdict
The definitive answer is yes, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol exceptionally well. The verdict by resolution confirms that all tested settings are playable at every resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is overpowered, with the best settings (Ultra) delivering an average of 130 FPS, far exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset provides a 96 FPS average, which is the ideal balance of visual fidelity and speed for competitive play. At 3840x2160, all presets are still playable, but the Ultra preset averages 62 FPS, which is the only configuration that comes close to the playable limit. For 4K gaming, sticking with High settings (82 FPS average) is the safer choice to maintain a more comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
This system is a high-performance pairing that will provide a fluid and responsive experience in Lockdown Protocol. It has more than enough power for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p monitors and can even handle 4K with some settings adjustments. The data confirms that for most players, this combo will not be the bottleneck in their system.