Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

94%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
163 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
76 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
120 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
56 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
77 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
9.9ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 67,469
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 48 55 77
1440p QHD 56 74 85 120
1080p Full HD 76 101 116 163

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 101
1920x1080 Low 163
1920x1080 Medium 116
1920x1080 Ultra 76
2560x1440 High 74
2560x1440 Low 120
2560x1440 Medium 85
2560x1440 Ultra 56
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 77
3840x2160 Medium 55
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. Its average benchmark score of 67,469 places it within a fraction of a percent of several workstation-class processors. The closest rival is the Intel Xeon w5-3525, which scores 67,673, a delta of just -0.3%. The AMD EPYC 4484PX trails by 0.5% with a score of 67,822, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is 0.6% behind at 67,868. The Intel Xeon 6515P is the only near neighbor ahead of the Core Ultra 9, scoring 67,006, a 0.7% advantage. In practical terms, swapping this CPU for any of those alternatives would produce nearly identical frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, since all four rivals land within a 1.3% band of the Core Ultra 9's aggregate score.

On the graphics side, the RTX 5060's average benchmark score of 26,331 is similarly competitive with a surprising set of rivals. The AMD Radeon 860M, an integrated graphics solution, scores 26,401, a 0.3% edge over the RTX 5060. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 also sits 0.3% ahead at 26,421. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary leads by 0.8% with a score of 26,553, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT falls 1.2% behind at 26,011. These deltas are small enough that in Lockdown Protocol, users should expect near-identical frame rates from any of these GPUs at the same settings and resolution, assuming no other system bottlenecks intervene.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured frame rates across resolutions reveal how the balance shifts between the Core Ultra 9 275HX and the RTX 5060. At 1920x1080, the CPU's headroom is abundant; the RTX 5060 becomes the limiting factor. The jump from Low to Medium settings drops average FPS from 163 to 116, a 47-frame reduction. Moving from Medium to High costs another 15 frames, landing at 101 FPS. Pushing to Ultra yields 76 FPS. The GPU's workload scales almost linearly with preset complexity at this resolution, which indicates the RTX 5060 is fully occupied.

At 2560x1440, the picture changes. Low settings deliver 120 FPS, but Medium drops to 85 FPS, a 35-frame loss. High settings produce 74 FPS, and Ultra falls to 56 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is proportionally larger than at 1080p, which suggests the pixel throughput demand is beginning to strain the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR7 frame buffer. The CPU's role remains secondary here; the Core Ultra 9's 24 cores and 36 MB of shared L3 cache are more than sufficient to feed the GPU at these frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the GPU dominates completely. Low settings average 77 FPS, Medium drops to 55 FPS, High falls to 48 FPS, and Ultra manages only 36 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a 41-frame collapse, driven almost entirely by the RTX 5060's 128-bit memory bus and 48 ROPs. The CPU's contribution becomes negligible at this resolution; even a substantially weaker processor would likely produce similar results, since the GPU is saturated well before the CPU's threading capacity is challenged. The data clearly shows that Lockdown Protocol at 1080p and 1440p is GPU-bound with this combo, while at 4K the GPU is the sole constraint.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with High settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 48, below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only Low settings cross that threshold at 4K, with an average of 77 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 74 FPS, which is the highest preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 85 FPS, but High is the most demanding playable option.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the RX 6750 XT in raw benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5060 scores 26,331 on average, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 6750 XT's 26,011. The delta is small enough that in-game performance differences would be minor.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 9 275HX significantly faster than the Xeon w5-3525?

A: No. The Core Ultra 9 scores 67,469, while the Xeon w5-3525 scores 67,673. The Xeon is actually 0.3% ahead, which is within measurement noise for most workloads.

Q: What frame rate does Ultra settings produce at 1080p?

A: Ultra at 1920x1080 averages 76 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the highest preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Medium?

A: No. Medium settings at 3840x2160 average 55 FPS, with minimums recorded at 47 FPS and maximums at 63 FPS. The average falls short of the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

The data confirms that this combination of Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 can run Lockdown Protocol, but the playable envelope depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears 60 FPS. Low averages 163 FPS, Medium hits 116 FPS, High reaches 101 FPS, and Ultra maintains 76 FPS. This resolution offers complete freedom of choice.

At 2560x1440, the system remains comfortably playable but with fewer options. Low settings average 120 FPS, Medium produces 85 FPS, and High delivers 74 FPS. Ultra falls to 56 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS threshold by a narrow margin. Users targeting 1440p should stick to High or below for consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 5060's limitations become pronounced. Only Low settings achieve playable performance, averaging 77 FPS. Medium drops to 55 FPS, High to 48 FPS, and Ultra to 36 FPS. The 4K experience is therefore restricted to Low presets, which may not deliver the visual fidelity most users expect from a modern FPS title. The verdict is clear: this PC runs Lockdown Protocol smoothly at 1080p and 1440p with high presets, but 4K gaming requires significant graphical compromises.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Low, which produces an average of 77 FPS. This is the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. Medium averages 55 FPS and falls short, so users must accept the visual trade-offs of Low to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, averaging 74 FPS. This preset provides a strong balance of visual quality and performance. Medium runs faster at 85 FPS, but High is the most demanding option that still stays above the 60 FPS line. Ultra at 56 FPS is not recommended for consistent gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, averaging 76 FPS. This gives users the full graphical experience without sacrificing frame rate. For those prioritizing maximum performance, Low reaches 163 FPS, Medium hits 116 FPS, and High produces 101 FPS, but Ultra is the optimal choice for visual fidelity while remaining playable.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific pairing of Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 2,473 out of 3,714 total combos. That places it in the lower third of all tested systems, which may seem surprising given the CPU's strong benchmark position. The explanation lies in the GPU: the RTX 5060's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, combined with its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface, limits its ability to push high frame rates at demanding resolutions.

The CPU's 94th percentile ranking among all processors indicates it is not the bottleneck in this system. The Core Ultra 9 275HX delivers exceptional single-thread and multi-thread performance, with Cinebench R23 scores of 2,204 single-core and 35,589 multi-core. But in Lockdown Protocol, the RTX 5060's modest 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 299.6 GTexel/s texture rate cap the system's overall capability. The rank of 2,473 out of 3,714 reflects this imbalance; systems with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs would likely rank higher in this specific game, as the title is clearly GPU-bound at most settings.

For users considering this combo, the data suggests that the Core Ultra 9 275HX provides substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades. The current RTX 5060 handles 1080p and 1440p well, but the 4K results show that a more powerful graphics card would unlock the CPU's full potential in Lockdown Protocol. As measured, this system is a solid 1080p and 1440p performer, with the CPU far exceeding the GPU's demands at every resolution tested.