Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
345 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
160 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
253 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
118 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
163 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
76 FPS
4.7ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 93,785
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 76 101 116 163
1440p QHD 118 157 180 253
1080p Full HD 160 214 245 345

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 214
1920x1080 Low 345
1920x1080 Medium 245
1920x1080 Ultra 160
2560x1440 High 157
2560x1440 Low 253
2560x1440 Medium 180
2560x1440 Ultra 118
3840x2160 High 101
3840x2160 Low 163
3840x2160 Medium 116
3840x2160 Ultra 76

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

# Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080: Lockdown Protocol Benchmark Analysis

The benchmark data for Lockdown Protocol, captured with an Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, reveals a system with substantial headroom across all tested resolutions. The CPU, a 24-core Arrow Lake Refresh part, posts an average benchmark score of 93,785 across a suite of compute and memory tests, placing it in the 96th percentile of all tested CPUs. The GPU, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, averages 56,083 across its test suite, landing in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The measured frame rates show a clear pattern: the combination is strongest at lower resolutions, with the gap between presets narrowing as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 345 FPS on Low settings, making it one of the faster configurations in the database for this title. The data indicates the bottleneck shifts from the CPU to the GPU as resolution and settings scale up, but the RTX 5080 remains the dominant partner throughout.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data is available for three resolutions. The data includes average, and in some cases, minimum and maximum frame rates, giving a fuller picture of frame time variance.

3840x2160 (4K): The most demanding test. At Low settings, the system averages 163 FPS. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 116 FPS, with a minimum of 99 FPS and a maximum of 133 FPS, indicating some frame time variance. At High settings, the average is 101 FPS. At Ultra settings, which is the most demanding preset tested, the system averages 76 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 87 FPS, a substantial 53% drop driven by the increased GPU load. All settings remain far above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

2560x1440 (1440p): At Low settings, the system averages 253 FPS. Medium settings yield 180 FPS on average, with a minimum of 153 FPS and a maximum of 207 FPS. High settings produce an average of 157 FPS. Ultra settings, the most demanding preset, yields an average of 118 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 135 FPS reduction, or 53%, which is a significant drop but leaves the game extremely fluid.

1920x1080 (1080p): At Low settings, the system achieves an average of 345 FPS. Medium settings average 245 FPS, with a minimum of 208 FPS and a maximum of 282 FPS. High settings produce an average of 214 FPS. At Ultra, the average is 160 FPS. The delta from Low to Ultra is 185 FPS, a 54% decrease. The system's minimum FPS at Medium settings is 208, which still provides a massive buffer above the 60 FPS threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data shows the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus sits almost exactly at parity with the Intel Xeon 6520P, with a 0% difference in average benchmark score. The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% slower, while the AMD EPYC 9175F is 1.9% slower. The AMD EPYC 4565P is 2.1% slower. This suggests the Ultra 7 270K Plus is positioned at the top of a tightly clustered group of high-end desktop processors; the performance delta between them is minimal, less than 2.2% across all listed rivals. For the GPU, the AMD Radeon 8060S is 0.6% ahead of the RTX 5080, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 0.7% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE trails by 2.2%. The data shows the RTX 5080 sits in the middle of a performance bracket where any of these alternatives would produce broadly similar frame rates. The Intel CPU and NVIDIA GPU pairing scores slightly below the top comparable AMD combination in the database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance data across resolutions makes the bottleneck analysis clear. At every resolution, the FPS delta from Low to Ultra is substantial. At 1080p, the drop is 185 FPS (from 345 to 160), a 54% reduction. At 1440p, the drop is 135 FPS (253 to 118), also 53%. At 4K, the drop is 87 FPS (163 to 76), 53% as well. This consistent 53% reduction across all three resolutions indicates the GPU is the primary scaling component when moving between presets. However, the average FPS at 1080p Low (345 FPS) vs 1440p Low (253 FPS) shows a 92 FPS drop, a 27% reduction from the resolution increase. From 1440p Low to 4K Low, the drop is 163 to 163 FPS, a 35% reduction. These resolution-based deltas show the CPU (Core Ultra 7 270K Plus) also plays a critical role; the engine at Low settings is still heavily CPU-bound at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K Low, the GPU begins to take more responsibility, and the CPU headroom is less of a constraint. Across all settings, the 1920x1080 Ultra preset averages 160 FPS, 1440p Ultra averages 118 FPS, and 2160p Ultra averages 76 FPS. The data indicates a balanced system where the CPU is sufficient for high frame rates at lower resolutions, and the GPU 5080 provides the muscle for 4K Ultra.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The benchmark data says yes. At 3840x2160, the playable presets are Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. The average FPS at Ultra is 76 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold by 16 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable; Ultra averages 118 FPS. At 1920x1080, the system averages 160 FPS at Ultra. The most demanding preset, 4K Ultra, remains well above the 60 FPS line. The system has enough performance to hold 60 FPS at the highest settings at the native 4K resolution, with a 16 FPS buffer. The minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium was 153 FPS, which is still 93 FPS above the threshold. There is no data suggesting the system drops below 60 FPS at any tested setting.

Best Settings per Resolution

At each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the optimal choice for visual fidelity while maintaining smoothness.

3840x2160: The Ultra preset averages 76 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested and it maintains a 16 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The data supports Ultra as the best setting at this resolution.

2560x1440: The Ultra preset averages 118 FPS. This is the most demanding settings and holds a 58 FPS margin above the threshold. Use Ultra at this resolution for maximum visual quality.

1920x1080: The Ultra preset produces 160 FPS on average. This is the most visually demanding option and remains 100 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra is the recommended setting at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3,714 tested combos in our game database, this Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 configuration ranks at #163. The nearest rivals from the data—AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB, AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE—all sit within roughly 2.2% of the combined score, making this a tightly competitive field. A difference of a few percentage points in combined scores translates to only a few FPS in practice; the measured FPS data confirms the margins are small, particularly against the AMD 8060S, which posts a 0.6% higher average benchmark score but delivers an average FPS that is nearly identical in the measured results.

FAQ

Q: What average FPS does the RTX 5080 deliver at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The system averages 76 FPS at 3840x2160 on the Ultra preset. The minimum FPS in the dataset is 99 FPS at 1440p Medium, which leaves a wide margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 Low, the system averages 345 FPS. At High settings, it averages 214 FPS. The CPU is not the primary limiter. The data shows the GPU is the performance scaling factor when moving from Low to Ultra, but the CPU maintains enough throughput at 1080p to keep frame rates high.

Q: How does the 2560x1440 Medium setting compare to the 3840x2160 High setting?

A: 1440p Medium averages 180 FPS, while 4K High averages 101 FPS. The 1440p Medium setting has a 79 FPS advantage. The resolution drop is less demanding than the 4K rendering workload, and the system provides more headroom.

Q: What is the most demanding setting tested?

A: The most demanding data point is 3840x2160 Ultra, which averages 76 FPS. It is still 16 FPS above playable threshold. The minimum measured FPS across all data points is 99 FPS at 1440p Medium, which indicates frame times are consistent.

Q: How close is the AMD Radeon 8060S to the RTX 5080 in average FPS?

A: The AMD 8060S has a deltaPct of +0.6% in average benchmark score. In measured FPS, the average scores are nearly identical within a few frames per second. The ranking data places both GPUs in the same performance tier.