Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 59 | 68 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 91 | 105 | 148 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 125 | 143 | 201 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
FAQ
Q: What is the overall performance rank of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination for Lockdown Protocol?
A: This combo ranks 1649 out of 3714 tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the upper half of all tested systems. Given the hardware's percentile standings — the CPU sits in the 96th percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU in the 72nd percentile versus all GPUs — the mid-pack ranking is influenced primarily by the GPU's more modest relative position.
Q: Which resolutions can run Lockdown Protocol at Ultra settings above 60 FPS?
A: Both 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 can run Ultra settings above 60 FPS. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 94. At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average FPS is 69. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS drops to 44, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 3840x2160?
A: The best playable setting at 4K is Medium, which produces an average of 68 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS. Low settings at this resolution yield 95 FPS average, while High drops to 59 FPS average — just below the playable threshold — and Ultra falls to 44 FPS average.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93785, which is essentially identical to the Intel Xeon 6520P at 93786 (0% delta). It trails the AMD EPYC 4564P by 1.5%, the AMD EPYC 9175F by 1.9%, and the AMD EPYC 4565P by 2.1%. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz contribute to its strong synthetic showing.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331. It is nearly tied with the AMD Radeon 860M at 26401 (-0.3% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421 (-0.3% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.8% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2% lower.
Q: What are the measured FPS figures for the 2560x1440 Medium preset?
A: At 2560x1440 Medium, the system delivers an average of 105 FPS, with a minimum of 89 FPS and a maximum of 120 FPS. This represents a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with the minimum never dipping below that line.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 1649 out of 3714 tested combinations places this system in the 55.6th percentile of all tested hardware pairs for Lockdown Protocol. This is a solidly mid-pack position, but the distribution of scores matters more than the raw rank. The CPU's 96th percentile standing suggests it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios, while the GPU's 72nd percentile position indicates that graphical throughput is the more constrained resource.
Examining the FPS data across resolutions reveals a clear pattern. At 1920x1080, the system is never below 94 FPS even at Ultra settings, which places it firmly in high-refresh territory. At 2560x1440, Ultra still clears 60 FPS with 69 FPS average, but the margin narrows considerably. At 3840x2160, the system falls below 60 FPS on High (59 FPS) and Ultra (44 FPS), confirming that 4K is only viable on Medium or Low presets.
The rank of 1649 reflects a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming but shows clear limitations at 4K. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth likely contributes to the scaling pattern observed — the 4K Ultra preset demands more memory bandwidth and capacity than this configuration can comfortably provide. The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support at 115.2 GB/s bandwidth are not the bottleneck at any resolution tested.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data shows a distinct shift in which component dominates as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strong single-thread performance — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2439 and a Passmark single-thread score of 5068 — allows the GPU to stretch its legs. The jump from Low (201 FPS) to Ultra (94 FPS) at 1080p represents a 53% performance drop, which is primarily GPU-bound scaling as pixel count and shading complexity increase.
At 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with a compressed range. Low settings produce 148 FPS, while Ultra produces 69 FPS — a 53% drop from Low to Ultra, matching the 1080p scaling almost exactly. This consistency suggests the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling across these two resolutions, with the CPU maintaining sufficient headroom to avoid becoming the bottleneck.
The transition to 3840x2160 reveals the GPU's limitations more starkly. Low settings yield 95 FPS, Medium yields 68 FPS, High yields 59 FPS, and Ultra yields 44 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 54%, similar to the other resolutions, but the absolute values are much lower. The CPU's role here is diminished — even at Low settings with 95 FPS, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The 4K pixel count of 8.3 million versus 1440p's 3.7 million and 1080p's 2.1 million explains the roughly linear scaling of GPU load.
The Medium preset data provides the clearest view of the CPU-GPU balance. At 1080p Medium, the system hits 143 FPS average with a minimum of 121 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it drops to 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS. At 4K Medium, it falls to 68 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS. The 1440p-to-4K drop of 35% is larger than the 1080p-to-1440p drop of 27%, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading throughput are increasingly stressed as resolution grows. The CPU's consistent contribution is confirmed by the fact that the minimum FPS at 1440p Medium (89) is still far above the playable threshold, meaning frame pacing issues are not CPU-induced.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are all server or workstation-class processors. The Intel Xeon 6520P matches the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus almost exactly with a 0% delta, making it functionally equivalent in raw compute. The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% faster, the AMD EPYC 9175F is 1.9% faster, and the AMD EPYC 4565P is 2.1% faster. These deltas are small enough that in real-world gaming scenarios, the differences would be negligible — the Core Ultra 7's 24-core, 24-thread configuration with a 5.50 GHz boost clock is competitive with these server parts in synthetic workloads, and the gaming performance differences would likely be within measurement noise.
For the GPU, the situation is more varied. The AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 are both 0.3% slower than the RTX 5060 in average benchmark score, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% faster and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% slower. These are all relatively close matches, but the RTX 5060's architecture advantages — Blackwell 2.0 with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, plus GDDR7 memory — mean that in Lockdown Protocol specifically, the RTX 5060's feature set could produce different results than the synthetic scores suggest. The RX 6750 XT's 1.2% lower score is the most significant delta among the GPU rivals, but it remains a close substitute.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers 94 FPS average. This is the maximum quality setting available and provides a 34 FPS margin above the playable threshold. The Medium preset at this resolution delivers 143 FPS with a minimum of 121 FPS, and High delivers 125 FPS, but Ultra remains the best choice for maximum visual quality.
At 2560x1440, Ultra also clears the 60 FPS threshold with 69 FPS average. This is a narrower margin — just 9 FPS above the threshold — but it is still playable. The Medium preset delivers 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS, providing a more comfortable experience if frame consistency is prioritized. For maximum quality, Ultra at 1440p is viable.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers 68 FPS average with a minimum of 57 FPS. The minimum dips below 60, but the average clears the threshold. Low settings at 4K deliver 95 FPS, providing a smoother experience but with reduced visual fidelity. High at 4K falls just short at 59 FPS average, and Ultra is not playable at 44 FPS.
The Verdict
The data indicates that this system can run Lockdown Protocol effectively at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 across all presets, including Ultra. At 1080p, Ultra delivers 94 FPS average, and at 1440p, Ultra delivers 69 FPS average — both above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The system is fully capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p with headroom to spare.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. Medium settings deliver 68 FPS average, which is playable, but the minimum of 57 FPS means occasional dips below the threshold. Low settings at 4K deliver 95 FPS, providing a consistently smooth experience. High at 4K is borderline at 59 FPS average, and Ultra at 44 FPS is not recommended for playable frame rates.
For a player prioritizing visual quality, 1440p Ultra is the sweet spot — it delivers 69 FPS average while maintaining the highest preset. For a player prioritizing smoothness at 4K, Low settings at 95 FPS provide the best experience, with Medium as a quality compromise at 68 FPS average. The system is clearly a 1080p and 1440p performer, with 4K requiring preset compromises.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce 201 FPS average, Medium produces 143 FPS with a minimum of 121 FPS and a maximum of 164 FPS, High produces 125 FPS, and Ultra produces 94 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 107 FPS, showing significant scaling with preset quality.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down proportionally. Low delivers 148 FPS, Medium delivers 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and a maximum of 120 FPS, High delivers 91 FPS, and Ultra delivers 69 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 79 FPS, reflecting the increased pixel load.
At 3840x2160, the system shows its limitations. Low delivers 95 FPS, Medium delivers 68 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS, High delivers 59 FPS, and Ultra delivers 44 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 51 FPS, but the absolute values are the lowest of the three resolutions tested. The Medium preset's minimum of 57 FPS is the only measured minimum below the 60 FPS threshold across all resolution-preset combinations, indicating that 4K Medium is the boundary of comfortable playability for this hardware combination.