Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
333 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
155 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
244 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
113 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
157 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
73 FPS
4.9ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 93,785
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 73 98 112 157
1440p QHD 113 151 173 244
1080p Full HD 155 206 236 333

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 206
1920x1080 Low 333
1920x1080 Medium 236
1920x1080 Ultra 155
2560x1440 High 151
2560x1440 Low 244
2560x1440 Medium 173
2560x1440 Ultra 113
3840x2160 High 98
3840x2160 Low 157
3840x2160 Medium 112
3840x2160 Ultra 73

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Lockdown Protocol is a fast-paced FPS, and the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers headroom that most players will never fully exhaust. The measured data shows this pairing is built for high-refresh-rate gameplay, with average frame rates that consistently dwarf the 60 FPS playability threshold. At every tested resolution, the most demanding "Ultra" preset remains comfortably playable, which is the primary takeaway for anyone looking to max out the game's visuals without compromising competitive responsiveness. The benchmark results indicate a system that will push well past standard monitor refresh rates at 1440p and deliver a smooth 4K experience that only dips slightly below the triple-digit mark.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data is unambiguous: this combo can run Lockdown Protocol at the highest visual quality preset, "Ultra," at every resolution tested, all while staying above the 60 FPS playable threshold. There is no need to compromise on settings for this title with this hardware.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the "Ultra" preset delivers an average frame rate of 73 FPS. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and it still clears the 60 FPS bar by a healthy margin, ensuring a fluid experience on a 4K display. While the "High" preset offers a higher average of 98 FPS, the data shows that "Ultra" is the optimal choice for visual fidelity, as the performance cost is acceptable.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the "Ultra" preset achieves an average of 113 FPS. This is a significant jump from 4K and firmly places the experience in high-refresh-rate territory (100+ Hz). For players with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, this setting will fully utilize the display's capabilities, providing buttery-smooth motion that is critical for a competitive FPS.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the most demanding "Ultra" preset produces an average of 155 FPS. This is the highest average frame rate recorded for the "Ultra" setting. The data suggests that at this resolution, the system is heavily favored towards the GPU, and the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames. This is the ideal configuration for esports-level play on a 240Hz monitor, as the average FPS is well within range of that refresh rate class.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling between different settings and resolutions reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Lockdown Protocol. The game is demonstrably GPU-bound, with the graphics card being the primary determinant of frame rate as visual fidelity increases.

The evidence is in the resolution scaling. At "Ultra" settings, the average FPS drops from 155 at 1080p to 113 at 1440p, and finally to 73 at 4K. This represents a 52.7% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. This steep decline is a classic sign of GPU saturation; the RTX 4080 is working progressively harder to render the increasing pixel count. The CPU's role remains relatively static, as it is capable of feeding the GPU with data at all three resolutions.

The scaling between presets at a fixed resolution further confirms this. At 4K, the difference between "Low" and "Ultra" is substantial: 157 FPS vs. 73 FPS. This indicates that the GPU's workload is dramatically increased by the higher-quality settings, which include more complex shading, lighting, and post-processing effects. The CPU's architecture, with its 24 threads, is not a limiting factor in this scenario.

At 1080p, the CPU's influence becomes slightly more apparent. The jump from "Low" (333 FPS) to "Ultra" (155 FPS) is a 53.5% drop, which is still largely GPU-driven. However, the absolute frame rates are so high that even a very powerful CPU would be hard-pressed to push much beyond 333 FPS. The data shows the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is more than capable of keeping up with the RTX 4080, but the GPU is the component that will determine the final frame rate at any given preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a granular look at performance across all settings and resolutions. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and RTX 4080 combination shows consistent scaling, with average frame rates that are always well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

3840x2160 (4K):

  • Ultra: 73 FPS average. This is the baseline for the most demanding setting and is a solid result for 4K gaming.
  • High: 98 FPS average. A significant step up from "Ultra," offering a smoother experience if visual extremes are not required.
  • Medium: 112 FPS average, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 129 FPS. The minimum frame rate shows excellent stability, with no noticeable dips below the average.
  • Low: 157 FPS average. This setting prioritizes frame rate above all else, more than doubling the "Ultra" preset's performance.

2560x1440 (1440p):

  • Ultra: 113 FPS average. This is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate gaming, providing a fluid experience that is well above 100 FPS.
  • High: 151 FPS average. A strong performance that is ideal for 144Hz displays.
  • Medium: 173 FPS average, with a minimum of 147 FPS and a maximum of 199 FPS. The frame time consistency here is excellent, as the minimum FPS stays above 144.
  • Low: 244 FPS average. This approaches the limits of what most high-end monitors can display, making it a good choice for extreme competitive play.

1920x1080 (1080p):

  • Ultra: 155 FPS average. This is the highest "Ultra" result, making it perfect for 144Hz and 165Hz displays.
  • High: 206 FPS average. This setting provides a massive frame rate cushion, ideal for 240Hz monitors.
  • Medium: 236 FPS average, with a minimum of 201 FPS and a maximum of 272 FPS. The minimum frame rate is exceptionally high, indicating no noticeable stutters.
  • Low: 333 FPS average. This is the maximum performance output recorded, showcasing the extreme headroom of this CPU-GPU pairing.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark database provides context on hardware that would perform in a similar tier. For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus sits near the top of the performance charts, with a percentile ranking of 96 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are all server-class processors, indicating its compute strength.

  • The Intel Xeon 6520P has an average benchmark score of 93786, which is essentially a 0% difference from the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus's average score of 93785. In gaming, this means the Xeon would provide nearly identical CPU-bound performance, though its platform features and power characteristics would differ.
  • The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% slower, and the AMD EPYC 9175F is 1.9% slower. These deltas are within the margin of error for gaming, meaning that for a CPU-bound scenario in Lockdown Protocol, these processors would not create a noticeable difference in frame rates.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a high-end part with an 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are also very close in overall compute power.

  • The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has an average score of 54209, which is a 0.1% delta from the RTX 4080's score of 54247. This makes it a direct and nearly identical alternative; in gameplay, the performance would be statistically indistinguishable.
  • The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% slower. While these are workstation and lower-tier gaming cards respectively, their overall compute scores are close, suggesting they would produce similar frame rates in a GPU-bound title like Lockdown Protocol, though driver optimizations and specific feature support could vary.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 205th out of 3714 total combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places the pairing in the top 5.5% of all tested systems. This is a very strong result, indicating that this hardware configuration is not just capable, but exceptional for this game. The rank reflects the high percentile scores of both the CPU (96th) and GPU (86th), and the measured FPS data confirms that this theoretical strength translates into real-world, high-refresh-rate performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with max settings?

A: Yes. The data shows the "Ultra" preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 73 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: You can use the "Ultra" preset, which delivers an average of 113 FPS. If you want a more consistent frame rate that never dips below 144 FPS, the "Medium" preset provides an average of 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 FPS.

Q: How does this combo compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score that is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080. In practical terms, the gaming performance between the two is effectively identical.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this GPU in this game?

A: The data suggests it is not a significant bottleneck. The frame rate scales heavily with resolution and preset, which indicates the GPU is the primary workload driver. The CPU's high percentile rank (96th) and strong multi-threaded scores (e.g., 44253 in Cinebench R23) show it has ample power to feed the RTX 4080.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with high settings?

A: The measured average FPS for the "High" preset at 1920x1080 is 206 FPS. This is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Does this combo rank high among all tested systems for this game?

A: Yes, it ranks 205th out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the top 5.5% of all systems for Lockdown Protocol performance.