Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
77 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
35 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
59 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
29 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
34 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
20 FPS
20ms Frame Time
30ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 70,879
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 7,472

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 20 21 23 34
1440p QHD 29 33 40 59
1080p Full HD 35 50 53 77

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 50
1920x1080 Low 77
1920x1080 Medium 53
1920x1080 Ultra 35
2560x1440 High 33
2560x1440 Low 59
2560x1440 Medium 40
2560x1440 Ultra 29
3840x2160 High 21
3840x2160 Low 34
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 Ultra 20

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 presents a stark contrast in capability. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is an older entry-level part, and the benchmark data for Lockdown Protocol clearly reflects this bottleneck. This combination is only viable at the lowest settings in 1080p, and even then, it barely surpasses the 60 FPS threshold. For any other resolution or preset, the user will be forced to make significant compromises.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?

A: Yes, but only at the Low preset. The recorded data shows an average of 77.1 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At Medium settings, the average drops to 53.2 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting for 1440p or 4K?

A: According to the verdict data, there are no playable settings at either 2560x1440 or 3840x2160. At 1440p, even the Low preset only achieves an average of 58.8 FPS, just under the threshold. At 4K, the best average is 33.6 FPS at Low settings, which is far from smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the GTX 1650 compare to its closest rivals in terms of raw score?

A: The GTX 1650 has an average benchmark score of 7472. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A310, scores 7550, which is 1% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 8850M scores 7447, just 0.3% lower, and the Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 7441, 0.4% lower. Performance is essentially on par with these parts.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 7 265K a high-performing CPU?

A: Yes, the data indicates it is. It sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 70879. Its closest rival, the Intel Xeon 6511P, scores 71051, a negligible 0.2% difference, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, which is 1% lower.

Q: Why is the frame rate so low at higher resolutions?

A: The benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern. At 1080p with High settings, the average is 50.2 FPS. This drops to 32.9 FPS at 1440p and further to 21.4 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the GPU, with its 4 GB of VRAM and modest compute power, becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases.

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combo for this game?

A: This specific combination ranks 3539 out of 3714 tested combos in the database for Lockdown Protocol. This places it near the bottom, confirming that the GPU is severely holding back the system's overall gaming potential.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data shows that this system is highly constrained. The goal is to find the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS.

  • 3840x2160 (4K): No preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest average FPS recorded is 33.6 at Low settings. High, Medium, and Ultra settings all fall below this, with averages of 21.4, 23.3, and 19.6 FPS respectively. The GPU is simply not capable of driving this resolution effectively.
  • 2560x1440 (1440p): No preset achieves 60 FPS. The Low preset comes closest with an average of 58.8 FPS, but it still misses the playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra settings show averages of 39.8, 32.9, and 28.6 FPS. The system is borderline unplayable at this resolution.
  • 1920x1080 (1080p): The Low preset is the only playable option, with a recorded average of 77.1 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 53.2 FPS, and High drops to 50.2 FPS, both failing to meet the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset is the most demanding but averages only 34.7 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data makes the performance bottleneck very clear. The Core Ultra 7 265K is a high-end processor, but the GTX 1650 is a low-tier GPU, and the gaming experience is dictated almost entirely by the graphics card.

This is evident from the scaling between resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 77.1 FPS. When the resolution is increased to 1440p at the same Low preset, the frame rate drops to 58.8 FPS, a significant 24% decrease. Moving to 4K Low yields only 33.6 FPS, a 56% drop from the 1080p result. This steep decline as resolution increases is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario.

The CPU's role is minimal across all tested settings. The Core Ultra 7 265K has ample processing power, and the GTX 1650 is not fast enough to generate frames that would challenge it. The difference between presets at a single resolution further illustrates this. At 1080p, the frame rate scales from 77.1 FPS at Low to 34.7 FPS at Ultra, a massive reduction caused by the increased graphical load on the GPU. The CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is saturated at all settings, and its performance ceiling is what defines the playable options.

The data shows the GPU is the sole determinant of performance here. The powerful CPU is effectively idle, waiting on the GPU to deliver frames. For this game, the GTX 1650 is the clear and absolute bottleneck, and no amount of CPU headroom can change that.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The answer is a highly conditional yes. According to the recorded data, the system is only playable at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset, where it achieves an average of 77.1 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system is not playable. The best average FPS recorded is 58.8 at Low settings, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the system is also not playable, with the best average being 33.6 FPS at Low settings.

The verdict is clear: this PC can run the game, but only at the lowest possible settings and at 1080p. The experience at 1440p or 4K will be below the playable threshold, even at Low presets. The Core Ultra 7 265K is an excellent CPU, but the GTX 1650 is a severe limiting factor for this title. Users should expect a playable but visually modest experience at 1080p Low, and should not expect smooth performance at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database's nearest rival data provides a clear picture of how this CPU and GPU compare to other hardware. The measured performance of this combo is essentially tied with several other parts, meaning an upgrade or downgrade within this group would yield a similar gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol.

For the CPU (Intel Core Ultra 7 265K): The performance is nearly identical to several other processors. The Intel Xeon 6511P has an average score that is only 0.2% lower, making it a direct equivalent. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 0.7% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 1.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-14700KF is 1% higher. All of these CPUs would provide a nearly identical experience in terms of CPU-bound performance, which is to say, they would all be equally held back by the GTX 1650.

For the GPU (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650): The graphics card is also matched by several rivals. The Intel Arc A310 has an average score 1% higher, making it a comparable alternative. The AMD Radeon HD 8850M scores 0.3% higher, and the Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R7 350 is 0.6% higher. All of these GPUs would deliver a similar, limited frame rate in this game, cementing the GTX 1650's status as a low-end part.

In practical terms, swapping in any of these CPU or GPU alternatives would not change the outcome for Lockdown Protocol. The system would still be GPU-bound, and the playable settings would remain limited to 1080p Low.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at 3539 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This is a very low ranking, placing it in the bottom 5% of all systems tested.

This low ranking is not due to a poor CPU. The Core Ultra 7 265K is a top-tier processor, and its individual benchmark scores place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The ranking is dragged down entirely by the GPU. The GTX 1650, which sits in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, is a major bottleneck.

The data shows a massive performance disparity between the two components. The CPU is capable of far more, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames. This pairing is a classic example of an unbalanced build, where a high-end processor is paired with a low-end graphics card. The result is a system that performs far below the potential of its best component and lands near the bottom of the rankings for a demanding game like Lockdown Protocol.