Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
60 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
83 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
9.2ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 70,879
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 51 59 83
1440p QHD 60 80 91 128
1080p Full HD 81 109 124 175

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Low 175
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 80
2560x1440 Low 128
2560x1440 Medium 91
2560x1440 Ultra 60
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 83
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Lockdown Protocol, though 4K gaming requires significant graphical compromises. Benchmark data shows this combination ranks in the 59th percentile among all tested GPU configurations and the 94th percentile for the CPU, placing it as a solid mid-to-upper tier setup for this FPS title. The measured frame rates reveal a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the most demanding 4K Ultra preset falling well below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates strong performance across all presets. The Low preset produces an average of 175 FPS, which drops to 124 FPS at Medium with a minimum of 106 FPS and a maximum of 143 FPS. High settings yield 109 FPS average, while Ultra maintains a comfortable 81 FPS average. All 1080p configurations remain far above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the most demanding Ultra preset offering a 35% margin over that baseline.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains robust but shows expected scaling pressures. Low settings deliver 128 FPS average, Medium drops to 91 FPS with a range of 77 to 105 FPS, and High produces 80 FPS average. Ultra settings at 1440p hit exactly 60 FPS average, representing the boundary of playable performance at this resolution. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 26% performance at Ultra settings, while the Low preset sees a more modest 37% reduction.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings are the only consistently playable option, yielding 83 FPS average. Medium settings drop to 59 FPS average with a minimum of 50 and maximum of 68 FPS, placing it just under the playability threshold. High settings fall to 51 FPS average, and Ultra plummets to 39 FPS average. The 4K Ultra preset represents a 52% performance loss compared to the same settings at 1440p, highlighting the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute limitations at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 2194 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 59th percentile of all configurations. This ranking reflects a system that is neither at the bleeding edge nor struggling, but rather sits comfortably in the upper-middle tier of gaming performance. The CPU alone ranks in the 94th percentile among all processors, indicating that the processor is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. The GPU, however, sits in the 59th percentile among all graphics cards, suggesting that the Radeon RX 9060 is the primary constraint on overall frame rates.

The gap between CPU and GPU percentiles is telling. While the Ultra 7 265K can feed frames far faster than the RX 9060 can render them, the graphics card becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings. This ranking position means that users with this combo will see performance consistent with other mid-range GPU pairings, even though the CPU has headroom for future graphics upgrades. The 3714 total tested combos provide a broad reference pool, and this system's position suggests it outperforms roughly 59% of all possible configurations tested for this game.

CPU and GPU Roles

At 1080p, the CPU plays a more significant role than at higher resolutions, as the RX 9060 can render frames quickly enough for the Ultra 7 265K to become a potential limiting factor. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p reduces average FPS from 175 to 81, a 54% drop that indicates the GPU is increasingly stressed as settings rise. However, even at Ultra, the system maintains 81 FPS, showing that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's demands at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to dominate the performance equation. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 53% reduction in average FPS (128 to 60), but the absolute numbers suggest the RX 9060 is working near its limits at Ultra. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking means it is unlikely to bottleneck at this resolution, but the GPU's 59th percentile position becomes more evident as settings increase. The 1440p Ultra result of exactly 60 FPS average indicates the GPU is the primary constraint.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The RX 9060's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus struggle with the pixel throughput required at 3840x2160, as evidenced by the 39 FPS average at Ultra settings. The CPU's role diminishes further, as frame rates are dictated almost entirely by the graphics card's rendering capabilities. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a 53% performance drop, mirroring the pattern seen at lower resolutions but with absolute numbers far below playable thresholds except at Low settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?

A: Yes, but only at 1080p and 1440p. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 81, and at 2560x1440 Ultra, the average is exactly 60 FPS. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average drops to 39 FPS, which is unplayable.

Q: What is the best 4K setting for this combo?

A: Low settings at 3840x2160 provide an average of 83 FPS, which is the only 4K preset that clearly exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings at 4K average 59 FPS, which is just barely below the threshold.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 81 to 60, representing a 26% reduction. At Low settings, the drop is from 175 to 128 FPS, a 27% reduction.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint as settings increase, while the CPU has ample headroom given its 94th percentile ranking. At 4K, the GPU is entirely the limiting factor, with the RX 9060's 59th percentile ranking explaining the significant performance drop.

Q: Does the RX 9060 have enough memory for Lockdown Protocol?

A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory appears sufficient for 1080p and 1440p playable settings, but the 4K performance suggests memory bandwidth limitations. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit bus likely contribute to the steep 4K performance penalties.

Q: What frame rates can users expect at Medium settings?

A: At 1080p Medium, the average is 124 FPS with a range of 106 to 143 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average is 91 FPS with a range of 77 to 105 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average is 59 FPS with a range of 50 to 68 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Xeon 6511P scores 71,051 in average benchmarks, just 0.2% below the Ultra 7 265K's performance. This means users with that Xeon processor would see nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 0.7% slower, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF is 1% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 1.3% faster. These small deltas indicate that any of these processors would deliver indistinguishable gaming performance when paired with the RX 9060.

For the GPU, the closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16,129 in average benchmarks, just 0.7% higher than the RX 9060's 16,014 average. This means the RTX 3060 Ti would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol. The AMD Radeon R9 370X is 1% slower, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 1% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% slower. Users with any of these graphics cards paired with a similar CPU would expect comparable performance, though the RX 7700's 1% delta puts it effectively on par with the RX 9060.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 81 FPS. This provides a 35% safety margin over the playability threshold, making it the recommended setting for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also clear the 60 FPS threshold with an exact average of 60 FPS. This is the boundary condition, so users who prefer a buffer may opt for High settings at 80 FPS average, but Ultra is technically playable according to the data.

At 3840x2160, Low settings are the only preset that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, delivering an average of 83 FPS. Medium settings at 59 FPS average are just below the threshold, making Low the clear choice for 4K playability. High and Ultra at 4K produce 51 and 39 FPS averages respectively, which are not recommended.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol successfully at 1080p and 1440p across all presets, with Ultra settings maintaining 81 FPS at 1080p and exactly 60 FPS at 1440p. At 4K, only Low settings provide a playable experience at 83 FPS, while Medium falls just short at 59 FPS average. The verdict by resolution confirms that 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 support the full range of settings, while 3840x2160 is restricted to Low for reliable 60 FPS performance. Users prioritizing 4K gaming may need to accept reduced visual fidelity or consider a more powerful GPU, but for 1080p and 1440p play, this combination delivers smooth, high-quality performance across the board.