Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
186 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
86 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
63 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
88 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
41 FPS
8.7ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 63,173
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 54 62 88
1440p QHD 63 84 97 136
1080p Full HD 86 115 132 186

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 115
1920x1080 Low 186
1920x1080 Medium 132
1920x1080 Ultra 86
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 97
2560x1440 Ultra 63
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Low 88
3840x2160 Medium 62
3840x2160 Ultra 41

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a decisive performance profile for Lockdown Protocol, a game that scales cleanly across resolutions. The data shows a system that is firmly capable of running the game at high framerates, with the only limitation appearing at 4K Ultra settings. The benchmark results indicate that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can push maximum settings well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 4K, users will need to dial settings back to Medium to maintain a smooth experience, though the game remains playable at Low settings as well.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS varies by resolution, and the recorded data provides a clear hierarchy.

At 3840x2160, the highest playable preset is Medium, which produces an average frame rate of 62 FPS. This is a marginal but sufficient margin above the playability threshold. The Low preset at this resolution runs at 88 FPS, offering a significant performance buffer for those who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity. The High preset drops to 54 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target, and Ultra is even more demanding at 41 FPS, making neither viable for a consistent 60 FPS experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves dramatically. The Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 63 FPS on average. This is a notable achievement for a high-end preset at a mid-range resolution. The High preset runs at 84 FPS, Medium at 97 FPS, and Low at 136 FPS, all of which comfortably exceed the 60 FPS target. The data indicates that 1440p is the sweet spot for this hardware, allowing for maximum quality settings without compromise.

At 1920x1080, the system is clearly over-provisioned. The Ultra preset achieves 86 FPS, which is the best settings choice here. Lower presets scale as expected: High runs at 115 FPS, Medium at 132 FPS, and Low at 186 FPS. This resolution is the least demanding, and the combo handles it with substantial headroom in all configurations.

The pattern is straightforward: lower resolutions allow for higher quality presets. The GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, while the CPU and GPU combined provide ample power for 1440p and 1080p gaming.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals in the database for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this game.

For the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, the closest matches in average benchmark score are the Intel Core i7-13790F, with a delta of 0.1% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is 0.5% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is 0.7% lower. These processors are all within a narrow performance band, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as lower resolution gaming, users would see nearly identical frame rates. The 265HX is a strong mobile part, and these rivals indicate that any of them would pair similarly with the RTX 5070 for Lockdown Protocol.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is compared against several AMD professional parts. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 is 0.1% higher in average score, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% lower, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% lower. These deltas are small, suggesting that the RTX 5070's performance in this game would be mirrored by these rivals. However, it is important to note that these are professional workstation GPUs, which may have different driver optimizations for gaming workloads. The benchmark data shows that the RTX 5070 is a capable mid-range part, and users with any of these alternatives would expect similar FPS numbers at the same settings.

The practical takeaway is that this combo sits in a competitive tier. If a user were to swap the CPU for an i7-13790F or the GPU for a Radeon Pro 580, the gameplay experience in Lockdown Protocol would be largely indistinguishable from the measured results.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database provides exact average, minimum, and maximum frame rates for each resolution and settings combination. The following breakdown is drawn directly from the recorded measurements.

At 3840x2160, the High preset yields an average of 54 FPS with no recorded minimum or maximum values. The Low preset runs at 88 FPS on average. The Medium preset shows an average of 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. This minimum is notable because it falls below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating occasional dips during intense scenes. The Ultra preset averages 41 FPS, which is the lowest recorded figure across all resolutions.

At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 84 FPS on average. Low runs at 136 FPS. Medium averages 97 FPS, with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 111 FPS. The Ultra preset achieves 63 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. The minimum and maximum values for Medium show a stable frame time distribution, with no severe drops.

At 1920x1080, all presets perform exceptionally well. High averages 115 FPS. Low runs at 186 FPS. Medium averages 132 FPS, with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS. Ultra averages 86 FPS. The minimum values at this resolution are all well above 60 FPS, confirming a smooth experience regardless of settings.

The data reveals a consistent scaling pattern. As resolution decreases, FPS increases proportionally. The Medium preset at each resolution shows the most detailed frame time data, with minimums that are tighter at lower resolutions. The 4K Medium minimum of 53 FPS is the only recorded dip below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that while the average is acceptable, there are moments of stutter.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, and the verdict is positive for most scenarios. The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS, and the data shows which combinations clear that bar.

At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low and Medium. The best setting is Medium, which runs at 62 FPS on average. This is a pass, but it is a narrow one. The High and Ultra presets fail to meet the 60 FPS requirement, so users at 4K must accept lower quality to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable: High, Low, Medium, and Ultra. The best setting is Ultra, with an average of 63 FPS. This is a clear win. Users can enjoy maximum visual quality at a resolution that is becoming standard, and the frame rate holds above the threshold.

At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, and the best setting is Ultra, averaging 86 FPS. This is the most comfortable scenario, with ample headroom for competitive play or high-refresh-rate displays.

The overall verdict is that this combo is a strong performer for Lockdown Protocol. It excels at 1080p and 1440p, offering full settings freedom. At 4K, it is playable but requires a step down from the highest presets. For most users, this will be an excellent experience, particularly if they prioritize frame rate over resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

Understanding which component matters more for this game requires examining the scaling between resolutions and presets. The data shows a clear division of labor.

The GPU is the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rate drops significantly as settings increase. The jump from Low to Medium is a 26 FPS decrease (from 88 FPS to 62 FPS), and from Medium to High, it drops another 8 FPS to 54 FPS. This steep decline indicates that the RTX 5070 is being fully utilized at 4K, and its rendering capabilities are the bottleneck. The CPU, with its high single-thread score, is not limiting at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the GPU still holds sway, but the CPU begins to show its strength. The Ultra preset at 63 FPS is only 21 FPS lower than High at 84 FPS, a smaller gap than at 4K. This suggests that as resolution decreases, the workload shifts from pure GPU rendering to a more balanced mix. The CPU's 20 cores and high boost clock ensure that frame pacing remains consistent, as evidenced by the tight minimum values.

At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more influential. The Ultra preset at 86 FPS is a significant jump from the 4K Ultra figure, and the Low preset reaches 186 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently at lower resolutions, preventing any starvation. The Core Ultra 7 265HX, with its strong single-core performance, is well-suited for this task.

The scaling between resolutions is telling. From 1080p Low to 4K Low, the FPS drops from 186 to 88, a 53% reduction. From 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra, the drop is from 86 to 41, a 52% reduction. This consistent halving of performance with each resolution doubling points to a GPU-bound scenario. However, the CPU's role is not negligible; at 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 100 FPS, which is a CPU-driven difference in how many frames can be processed.

In summary, the RTX 5070 is the dominant factor at 4K and 1440p, while the 265HX provides the necessary headroom at 1080p. Users should overclock or tweak GPU settings at high resolutions, but at lower resolutions, the CPU will ensure no bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's ranking of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 holds a rank of 2058 out of 3714 total combos. This places it in the 55th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of all tested systems.

This rank is a composite measure of the combo's overall capability across various games and workloads. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, the performance is strong at 1080p and 1440p, which likely contributes positively to the ranking. However, the 4K performance is merely adequate, which may hold the rank back from being higher.

The rank of 2058 out of 3714 is a solid mid-tier position. It indicates that this system is not at the absolute top of the performance charts, but it is far from being a low-end configuration. Users with this combo can expect a capable machine that handles modern games well, with the caveat that 4K gaming will require settings adjustments.

The percentileVsAllCpus for the CPU is 93%, and for the GPU, it is 82%. These individual scores are high, but the combined rank is lower because the CPU is a mobile part, which may have thermal constraints in sustained workloads. Nevertheless, for Lockdown Protocol, the recorded FPS data shows that this combo punches above its weight, offering a great experience at most resolutions.