Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 17 | 23 | 26 | 37 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 36 | 41 | 58 |
| 1080p Full HD | 36 | 49 | 56 | 78 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the AMD Radeon 890M is a combination that falls significantly short of delivering a smooth experience in Lockdown Protocol at most settings, with the data showing that only the lowest preset at 1080p crosses the 60 FPS threshold. The benchmark results paint a clear picture: this integrated graphics solution is only viable for the most performance-conscious configurations, and even then, the margin for error is thin. The measured FPS data, the combo's rank among thousands of tested systems, and the verdict by resolution all point to a hardware pairing that is best suited for 1080p Low, with everything else requiring substantial compromises.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Lockdown Protocol reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution and graphical demands increase. At 3840x2160, the system is largely overwhelmed. On Ultra settings, the average FPS is a mere 17, which is far below any playable threshold and indicates a slideshow-like experience. Dropping to High at 4K improves the average to 23 FPS, but this is still categorically unplayable for a fast-paced FPS. The Medium preset at 4K yields an average of 26 FPS, with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 30, showing that even the most modest settings at this resolution cannot stabilize performance. The only 4K option that approaches a semi-interactive frame rate is Low, which averages 37 FPS, but this is still a far cry from the 60 FPS target and would likely feel choppy in action sequences.
Moving down to 2560x1440, the situation improves but remains below the playability threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 27 FPS, which is still a significant bottleneck. High settings at this resolution bring the average up to 36 FPS, a noticeable step up but still not smooth. The Medium preset delivers an average of 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 47, indicating that while the frame rate is more consistent, it still fails to reach the 60 FPS goal. The Low preset at 1440p is the standout, producing an average of 58 FPS. This is tantalizingly close to the 60 FPS target but ultimately falls short, meaning the system cannot guarantee a locked 60 FPS experience even at the lowest settings in this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the data shows the only playable configuration. The Ultra preset at 1080p averages 36 FPS, which is still not suitable for competitive play. High settings improve this to an average of 49 FPS, but this remains below the threshold. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 47 and a maximum of 64, showing that while the average is close, the minimum frame rate can dip significantly below 60, causing noticeable stutters. The Low preset at 1080p is the definitive winner, achieving an average of 78 FPS. This is the only setting and resolution combination in the entire dataset that not only clears the 60 FPS threshold but does so with a comfortable margin, providing the headroom necessary for a fluid gameplay experience.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of all tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and AMD Radeon 890M ranks at 3495 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 6% of all systems tested, underscoring that this is a decidedly low-performance configuration for this particular game. The rank is a direct reflection of the GPU's limitations; the CPU is powerful, but the integrated graphics solution holds the entire system back. This is not a mid-pack performer; it is a dedicated low-end solution that is only suitable for the most minimal graphical settings.
The CPU itself, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, is a high-end mobile processor, as evidenced by its benchmark scores. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40642 and a single-core score of 5737, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 63173 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-13790F, which scores 63080 (a 0.1% difference), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, which scores 63331 (a -0.2% difference). This indicates the CPU is not the bottleneck; it is more than capable of feeding frames to the GPU. However, the GPU's performance is the limiting factor. The AMD Radeon 890M sits in the 45th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 9210. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (9221, -0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (9273, -0.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (9294, -0.9%), all of which are older or lower-tier parts. This GPU simply does not have the raw horsepower to push high frame rates in a modern FPS at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 4K resolution?
A: No. The benchmark data shows that at 3840x2160, the highest average FPS achieved is 37 on Low settings, which is far below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra settings at this resolution average only 17 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?
A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 is the only configuration that exceeds 60 FPS, averaging 78 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution averages 56 FPS, which is below the target, and High averages 49 FPS.
Q: How does the Radeon 890M compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210. Its closest competitors are the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (9221, -0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (9273, -0.7%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (9294, -0.9%). Performance is essentially on par with these older discrete GPUs.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?
A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs with strong benchmark scores, while the Radeon 890M ranks in the 45th percentile of GPUs. The CPU has ample headroom, but the integrated graphics cannot deliver the required frame rates.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this combo for Lockdown Protocol?
A: This combination ranks 3495th out of 3714 tested combos in the game, placing it in the bottom 6% of all systems. This indicates a very low performance tier for this specific title.
Q: Is there any playable setting at 2560x1440?
A: No. The highest average FPS at 2560x1440 is 58 on Low settings, which just misses the 60 FPS target. All other presets at this resolution average between 27 and 41 FPS, making them unplayable for a smooth experience.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals for both the CPU and GPU, several other hardware configurations would behave similarly to this combo in Lockdown Protocol. On the CPU side, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is nearly identical in performance to the Intel Core i7-13790F (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (-0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (0.5% delta). Swapping in any of these processors would result in a negligible change in overall system performance, meaning the frame rates would be virtually identical, as the GPU remains the limiting factor.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon 890M's performance is matched by the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (-0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (-0.7% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (-0.9% delta). These GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol at the same settings. This means a system with an older GTX 960 or a Vega 8 integrated GPU would be a direct substitute in terms of gaming performance. The data suggests that any of these GPU alternatives, when paired with a similarly performing CPU, would yield the same playability profile: 1080p Low being the only playable option, with 1440p Low being borderline and everything else falling short of 60 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data provides a clear verdict on the best settings for each resolution, defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. Even the Low setting only achieves an average of 37 FPS, which is below the threshold. Similarly, at 2560x1440, no preset meets the 60 FPS requirement. The Low preset comes closest with an average of 58 FPS, but it still fails to clear the bar. The only resolution with a playable setting is 1920x1080, where the Low preset achieves an average of 78 FPS. This is the sole configuration in the dataset that provides a smooth, playable experience, and it does so with enough headroom to handle less demanding scenes without dropping below 60 FPS.
The Verdict
The verdict is unambiguous: this PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but only at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The verdict by resolution confirms that 3840x2160 and 2560x1440 have no playable settings, meaning there is no configuration at these resolutions that achieves an average of 60 FPS or higher. The system's performance at 1080p is the only saving grace, where the Low preset delivers a solid 78 FPS average, clearing the playable threshold of 60 FPS with a comfortable margin. For users who own this hardware, the path to a playable experience is narrow and requires accepting the lowest graphical fidelity at the most common resolution. Any attempt to increase visual quality or resolution will result in frame rates that are below the standard for a responsive FPS experience. The hardware combination is fundamentally limited by the integrated GPU, and the data shows that it is only capable of handling the most undemanding settings.