Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 83 | 111 | 127 | 178 |
| 1440p QHD | 128 | 171 | 196 | 276 |
| 1080p Full HD | 175 | 234 | 268 | 369 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers an overwhelmingly positive experience in Lockdown Protocol, with the data showing that every single preset tested at all three resolutions remains far above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The combination reaches its performance ceiling at 1920x1080 with a striking 369 FPS average on Low settings, and it never drops below 83 FPS average even at the most demanding 3840x2160 Ultra configuration. This is a top-tier pairing that prioritizes raw frame rates above all else, and the benchmark results confirm that the RTX 5090 is the dominant performance driver across the board.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a clear pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, but the margins between presets vary significantly depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces an average of 369 FPS, which drops to 268 FPS on Medium, then 234 FPS on High, and finally 175 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at this resolution is the only configuration in the entire dataset that includes complete frame time data, showing a minimum of 227 FPS and a maximum of 308 FPS, which indicates a tight frame pacing window of approximately 81 FPS between the lowest and highest recorded frames.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same settings hierarchy applies but with proportionally lower averages. Low settings deliver 276 FPS, Medium drops to 196 FPS, High reaches 171 FPS, and Ultra settles at 128 FPS. The Medium preset again provides the only full min/max data at this resolution, with a minimum of 167 FPS and a maximum of 226 FPS, representing a 59 FPS spread. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 25% of the frame rate at each corresponding preset, which suggests that the GPU is still operating well within its capabilities at this resolution and that the CPU is not yet becoming a limiting factor.
At 3840x2160, the performance picture changes more dramatically. Low settings still generate a highly playable 178 FPS average, but the gap between presets widens considerably. Medium produces 127 FPS with a minimum of 108 FPS and a maximum of 146 FPS, High drops to 111 FPS, and Ultra falls to 83 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 95 FPS, compared to a 194 FPS difference at 1080p and a 148 FPS difference at 1440p. This compression of the settings range at higher resolutions is a classic sign of GPU-bound scaling, where the increased pixel count limits how much headroom the graphics card has to absorb higher quality settings.
The frame time data available for Medium presets shows that even the worst-case minimums remain comfortably above 100 FPS at 4K and above 167 FPS at 1440p. The maximum frame rates at Medium settings reach 146 FPS at 4K, 226 FPS at 1440p, and 308 FPS at 1080p, which indicates that the combination can push well beyond average performance when the scene allows. Overall, the measured results show no configuration that even approaches the 60 FPS playability threshold, making this combo effectively future-proof for this game at any reasonable settings combination.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD EPYC 4464P, which scores 64823 compared to the 265's 64640, a negligible 0.3% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is essentially identical with a 64438 score and a 0.3% delta, which makes sense given that the F-suffix variant typically disables integrated graphics. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202 (0.7% behind), and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65104 (0.7% ahead). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning that for Lockdown Protocol, swapping the 265 for any of these alternatives would produce virtually indistinguishable frame rates, assuming the GPU remains constant.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, the nearest rivals present a more interesting comparison. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605 versus the 5090's 79842, a 0.3% difference, while the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79396 (0.6% behind). The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940 (1.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959 (1.4% ahead). These rival GPUs are all within a narrow 1.4% band of the 5090's average benchmark score, which suggests that in synthetic workloads they perform at a similar level. However, the 5090's massive 32 GB GDDR7 memory capacity and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth differentiate it from these rivals in ways that may not show up in average benchmark scores but could matter for future titles or higher-resolution textures.
The practical implication for Lockdown Protocol is that any of these rival GPUs would likely deliver frame rates within a few percent of the 5090, based purely on the average score deltas. The CPU rivals are similarly close, so a system built around the EPYC 9124 or the Core Ultra 7 265F would behave nearly identically to the tested configuration. That said, the 5090's percentile ranking of 92 among all GPUs and the 265's percentile ranking of 93 among all CPUs indicate that both components sit near the top of their respective performance distributions, so the closest alternatives are still elite-tier hardware rather than mid-range options.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data indicates that the GPU plays a dominant role in determining Lockdown Protocol's performance, but the CPU's influence becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 194 FPS (369 versus 175), which is the largest absolute spread across any resolution. This wide gap suggests that at 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom to render frames quickly, but the CPU must feed it data fast enough to sustain those rates. The 369 FPS average on Low settings is exceptionally high, and achieving that level of performance requires a CPU that can handle the game's simulation and draw call overhead without becoming a bottleneck.
Scaling from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by 25% at Low settings (369 to 276), 27% at Medium (268 to 196), 27% at High (234 to 171), and 27% at Ultra (175 to 128). This consistent reduction across all presets indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution transition, as the CPU load does not change with resolution while the GPU workload increases with pixel count. The fact that performance scales nearly linearly with resolution suggests that the RTX 5090 is being fully utilized at 1440p and that the CPU has spare capacity.
The transition from 1440p to 4K shows a different pattern. Low settings drop from 276 to 178 FPS (a 36% reduction), Medium from 196 to 127 (35% reduction), High from 171 to 111 (35% reduction), and Ultra from 128 to 83 (35% reduction). The percentage loss is larger at 4K than at 1440p, which confirms that the GPU is increasingly the limiting factor as resolution rises. At 4K Ultra, the 83 FPS average is still well above the 60 FPS threshold, but the 5090 is clearly working harder to maintain that performance. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K because the GPU takes longer to render each frame, giving the CPU more time to prepare the next frame without becoming a bottleneck.
The data also shows that the CPU's single-threaded performance, as measured by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960, is more than sufficient for this game. The 20-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.30 GHz boost clock provides ample headroom for the game's engine, and the benchmark results show no evidence of CPU-related frame drops at any resolution. In summary, players should expect the GPU to be the decisive component at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU becomes more relevant at 1080p when frame rates exceed 300 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 48th out of 3714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 1.3% of all systems tested. This ranking reflects the overall performance of the pair across all benchmark scenarios, and it confirms that this is an exceptionally powerful configuration for this game. The 48th position out of 3714 means that only 47 other system combinations delivered higher average frame rates or better frame time consistency, which is a remarkable achievement given the diversity of hardware configurations in the database.
The high ranking is consistent with the component-level percentiles: the CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. When combined, these two top-tier components produce a system that outperforms the vast majority of alternatives. The ranking also implies that the combination is well-balanced, as neither component appears to bottleneck the other significantly. If the CPU were severely limiting the GPU, the combo rank would likely be lower despite the GPU's high percentile.
It is importantly the combo rank of 48 is based on measured data from the game itself, not synthetic benchmarks. This means that the ranking reflects real-world performance in Lockdown Protocol, accounting for the game's specific engine characteristics, draw call patterns, and rendering techniques. The fact that this combination achieves such a high rank suggests that the game is well-optimized for high-end hardware and that the RTX 5090's capabilities are being fully utilized. Players seeking the best possible experience in Lockdown Protocol would be well-served by this configuration, as it delivers performance that is near the top of the entire tested population.
FAQ
Q: Can this combination run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 83 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the lowest average across all tested configurations, but it remains comfortably playable.
Q: What is the highest frame rate achievable with this setup?
A: The highest measured average is 369 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At 1440p Low, the average drops to 276 FPS, and at 4K Low, it reaches 178 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 5090 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79842, while its nearest rivals include the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79605 (0.3% behind) and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X at 80959 (1.4% ahead). These differences are minimal.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more relevant because frame rates are extremely high (up to 369 FPS on Low). The GPU still matters, but the CPU's ability to feed frames quickly is critical at these performance levels.
Q: What is the best settings preset to use at 2560x1440?
A: The Ultra preset delivers an average of 128 FPS at 1440p, making it the best possible visual quality while still maintaining a high frame rate. All presets at this resolution exceed 128 FPS average, so players have full flexibility.
Q: How many total system combinations were tested for comparison?
A: The combo rank of 48 is out of 3714 total combinations, meaning this system outperforms approximately 99% of all tested configurations in Lockdown Protocol.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, delivering an average of 175 FPS. This is the most demanding setting configuration available, and it still provides nearly three times the 60 FPS playability threshold. Players who prioritize maximum visual fidelity should select Ultra without any concern for performance drops.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset remains the best option, with an average of 128 FPS. The step down to High settings yields 171 FPS, but the visual quality improvement from High to Ultra is worth the 43 FPS reduction, as the resulting frame rate is still exceptionally smooth. The Medium preset offers 196 FPS for those who prefer higher refresh rates over visual detail.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 83 FPS, which is the most demanding configuration in the entire dataset but still comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. For players who want to maximize visual quality at 4K, Ultra is the clear choice. The High preset provides 111 FPS for those who want more headroom, and Medium offers 127 FPS with a minimum of 108 FPS, ensuring no noticeable frame drops. Low settings at 4K reach 178 FPS, which is overkill for most displays but available for competitive play. Across all three resolutions, the data shows that Ultra settings are always viable, making this combination one of the few tested systems that never requires compromising on visual quality to maintain playable frame rates.