Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
345 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
160 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
253 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
118 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
163 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
76 FPS
4.7ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 76 101 116 163
1440p QHD 118 157 180 253
1080p Full HD 160 214 245 345

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 214
1920x1080 Low 345
1920x1080 Medium 245
1920x1080 Ultra 160
2560x1440 High 157
2560x1440 Low 253
2560x1440 Medium 180
2560x1440 Ultra 118
3840x2160 High 101
3840x2160 Low 163
3840x2160 Medium 116
3840x2160 Ultra 76

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Lockdown Protocol, a 2024 FPS title, places significant demands on any system, but the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 proves to be exceptionally potent. The measured data indicates that this pairing delivers frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across nearly all configurations, making it a top-tier choice for high-refresh-rate gaming. The analysis below breaks down the specific performance metrics, component roles, and what the numbers imply for a smooth gameplay experience.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 76 FPS. This is a significant finding, as it means the system can run the game at its highest visual fidelity at 4K without dipping below the playable threshold. While the High preset averages 101 FPS and Medium averages 116 FPS, the Ultra preset's 76 FPS average still provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, allowing for the best possible image quality.

For 2560x1440 (1440p), the system again pushes the limits, with Ultra settings being the best choice, delivering an average of 118 FPS. This score is more than double the playable threshold, indicating that the combination of CPU and GPU has ample headroom at this resolution. The High preset at 157 FPS and Medium at 180 FPS are even faster, but the Ultra setting provides a balance of high fidelity and high speed that most players would prefer.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the data shows that Ultra settings are the optimal choice, achieving a staggering average of 160 FPS. This performance level is ideal for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors. The system's capability here is so robust that even the most demanding preset is not a bottleneck, with the Low preset reaching 345 FPS and Medium hitting 245 FPS, but Ultra remains the best for visual quality without compromising the high frame rate.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals a classic pattern where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. At 1080p, the jump from Low (345 FPS) to Ultra (160 FPS) is a 54% reduction in frame rate, indicating that the graphics card is heavily loaded by the increased visual complexity. This large delta suggests that the RTX 5080 is the limiting factor, as the Core Ultra 7 265 has enough processing power to feed the GPU at these frame rates.

Moving to 1440p, the same Low-to-Ultra transition shows a drop from 253 FPS to 118 FPS, a 53% decrease. This proportional scaling is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, where the core count and clock speed of the CPU are less critical than the raw pixel-pushing ability of the graphics card. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, provides sufficient single-thread performance to handle game logic and draw calls without becoming a limiting factor.

At 4K, the GPU's dominance is even more apparent. The Ultra preset averages 76 FPS, which is 53% lower than the Low preset's 163 FPS. This consistent percentage drop across all resolutions strongly indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the primary driver of performance in Lockdown Protocol. The CPU's role is to maintain a stable frame pacing and handle background tasks, but it does not appear to be a constraint, as the frame rate scales almost entirely with the GPU's workload. The data implies that for this game, the RTX 5080's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 10752 shading units are far more critical than the CPU's L3 cache or core configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates show a clear hierarchy: Low settings produce an average of 163 FPS, Medium averages 116 FPS (with a min of 99 and max of 133), High averages 101 FPS, and Ultra averages 76 FPS. The frame time consistency, as indicated by the min and max values for Medium, suggests that the system maintains a stable performance envelope, with the 99 FPS minimum still well above the 60 FPS threshold.

For 2560x1440, the performance scales upward as expected. Low settings yield an average of 253 FPS, Medium averages 180 FPS (min 153, max 207), High averages 157 FPS, and Ultra averages 118 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is relatively small (a 13% difference), which may indicate that certain High preset effects are less demanding than the transition from Low to Medium. The minimum FPS at Medium (153) is still far above the playable threshold, confirming smooth gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high. Low settings reach an average of 345 FPS, Medium averages 245 FPS (min 208, max 282), High averages 214 FPS, and Ultra averages 160 FPS. Even the minimum FPS recorded at Medium (208) is more than three times the 60 FPS playability threshold. This data suggests that at 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-bound, and any CPU limitations are negligible, as the Core Ultra 7 265's boost clock of 5.30 GHz provides ample single-core performance.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The data unequivocally says yes, and not just at playable levels. According to the verdictByResolution field, all settings at all three resolutions are playable, meaning they exceed the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Ultra with an average of 76 FPS, which is a definitive pass for a high-fidelity 4K experience. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 118 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. Finally, at 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 160 FPS, which is perfect for esports-level competitive play. This system does not merely run the game; it dominates it, providing a smooth experience at the highest possible settings regardless of resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD EPYC 4464P has an average benchmark score that is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, indicating nearly identical performance. Similarly, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is 0.3% faster, and the AMD EPYC 7343 is 0.7% faster. These processors would behave almost exactly the same in Lockdown Protocol, though they are server-class parts. The AMD EPYC 9124 is 0.7% slower, which would be imperceptible in real-world gaming.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon 8060S is 0.6% slower than the RTX 5080, making it a very close match. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 0.7% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower. On the other side, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster, which would provide a slight edge. In practical terms, a user with any of these GPUs would see very similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, with differences of only a few FPS. The data suggests that the RTX 5080 sits in a performance band where its direct competitors are within a 3% margin of its score.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate this system can achieve at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 345 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Can this PC handle 4K gaming at the highest settings?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 76 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is 0.3% slower than the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded at 1440p?

A: The lowest average at 2560x1440 is 118 FPS with the Ultra preset, which is still well above the playable threshold.

Q: Is the GPU more important than the CPU for this game?

A: Yes, the frame rate scaling between resolutions and presets shows a consistent 53% drop from Low to Ultra settings, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at Medium settings in 4K?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 99, ensuring a stable experience without dips below 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 163rd out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the top 4.4% of all configurations tested, which is an outstanding result. The rank reflects not just the high average frame rates, but also the consistency across all resolutions and settings. This percentile position indicates that only a small fraction of systems can outperform this pairing, making it a top-tier choice for any player seeking maximum performance in this FPS. The data confirms that this is a high-end combination that will not struggle with any settings the game can throw at it.