Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 57 | 76 | 87 | 123 |
| 1440p QHD | 89 | 118 | 135 | 191 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 161 | 185 | 260 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a starkly different experience depending on the target resolution in Lockdown Protocol. At 1080p, the system is overwhelmingly powerful, while at 4K, it requires a deliberate selection of graphics presets to maintain smooth gameplay. The measured data reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution, but with some notable performance cliffs at the highest settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results provide a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptionally high frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 260, which is more than four times the playable threshold of 60 FPS. Moving up to Medium settings yields an average of 185 FPS, with a minimum of 157 FPS and a maximum of 213 FPS. The High preset averages 161 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a robust 121 FPS average. None of the 1080p presets dip below the 60 FPS playability line, indicating that the CPU and GPU combination has significant headroom at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the performance profile remains strong but shows the expected impact of additional pixel shading. The Low preset averages 191 FPS, while Medium delivers 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. The High preset drops to 118 FPS average, and Ultra brings the average down to 89 FPS. All 1440p presets stay comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset retaining a 48% margin over the playability baseline.
The 3840x2160 results show the most significant scaling challenges. The Low preset averages 123 FPS, which is still highly playable. Medium settings produce an average of 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 101 FPS. The High preset averages 76 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 57 FPS average, which sits below the 60 FPS playability threshold. This specific result indicates that the 4K Ultra preset is the only configuration in the entire tested matrix that fails to maintain playable performance. The transition from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings represents a 36% performance drop, while the same resolution change at Low settings only reduces performance by 36% as well, interestingly showing consistent scaling across the resolution spectrum.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, but not at the highest settings. The data shows playable performance at 4K with Low (123 FPS), Medium (87 FPS), and High (76 FPS) presets. The Ultra preset at 4K averages 57 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gameplay?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 89 FPS, which is the most demanding configuration that still maintains playable performance. This is the highest quality option tested that stays above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the 1080p Ultra performance compare to the 4K Ultra performance?
A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the system averages 121 FPS. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average drops to 57 FPS. This represents a 53% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings.
Q: Which component is more likely to be the bottleneck at 4K Ultra settings?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, as the average FPS of 57 falls below the playable threshold. The CPU's strong multi-core performance, indicated by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216, suggests it has ample headroom, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26927 shows it is working heavily at this resolution.
Q: Is there a significant difference between Low and Medium settings at 1080p?
A: Yes, the difference is substantial. Low settings average 260 FPS, while Medium averages 185 FPS. That is a 29% reduction in frame rate for the Medium preset, which still provides a very smooth experience.
Q: What are the minimum frame rates recorded during testing?
A: Minimum FPS data was only captured for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p, the minimum was 157 FPS; at 1440p, it was 115 FPS; and at 4K, it was 74 FPS. All of these minimums are well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data across resolutions reveals how the balance of work shifts between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. At 1920x1080, the extremely high frame rates, particularly the 260 FPS average on Low settings, indicate that the GPU is not saturated, and the CPU's performance is sufficient to feed it. The Core Ultra 7 265, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, shows strong single-threaded capability with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960, which helps maintain high minimum frame rates in FPS titles.
As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease across all presets, reflecting the increased pixel workload handled by the RTX 4070. The 1440p Ultra average of 89 FPS suggests the GPU is still managing the load effectively, but the gap between Low and Ultra presets widens compared to 1080p. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 139 FPS (260 vs 121), while at 1440p, this difference shrinks to 102 FPS (191 vs 89). This narrowing gap indicates that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor in determining overall performance.
The 4K results provide the clearest indication of component roles. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 drops to 57 FPS, which is the only sub-60 FPS result in the entire dataset. This suggests that the RTX 4070, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, is reaching its limit under the combined load of high resolution and maximum graphical features. The CPU's role at this resolution becomes less critical, as the GPU's rendering workload dominates the frame time budget. The consistent 36% performance drop from 1440p to 4K at both Low and Ultra settings confirms that resolution scaling is the primary driver of performance changes, with the GPU architecture handling the increased pixel count in a linear fashion.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 provide context for its CPU performance. The AMD EPYC 4464P shows an average benchmark score that is 0.3% lower than the Core Ultra 7 265, making it a nearly identical performer. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, which is the same processor without integrated graphics, scores 0.3% higher on average, indicating that the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU does not meaningfully impact compute benchmarks. The AMD EPYC 7343 trails by 0.7%, while the AMD EPYC 9124 is 0.7% faster than the Core Ultra 7 265 in average benchmark scores. These deltas are all within a narrow band, suggesting that any of these CPUs would provide similar frame pacing in Lockdown Protocol, though the EPYC processors are enterprise parts with different platform requirements.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070's nearest rivals show a more interesting comparison. The NVIDIA Tesla P4, a datacenter card, scores 0.1% higher on average, which is a negligible difference. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 0.4% higher, suggesting it would deliver nearly identical frame rates in this game. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, a laptop GPU, scores 1.3% lower than the RTX 4070, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 trails by 1.3%. In practical terms for Lockdown Protocol, the RTX 4070 and RX Vega 56 would likely produce indistinguishable performance, while the RTX 4080 Mobile might show slightly lower average FPS, particularly at 4K where the GPU is the limiting factor.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains playable performance is Ultra, which averages 121 FPS. This is the highest quality setting tested at this resolution and provides a 61 FPS margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Players seeking maximum visual fidelity at 1080p can enable all settings without concern.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains playable with an average of 89 FPS. This provides a 29 FPS margin above the threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense action sequences. The data shows that 1440p Ultra is a viable option for this hardware combination.
For 3840x2160, the situation changes. The High preset is the most demanding playable option, averaging 76 FPS. This provides a 16 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset offers a higher average of 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, which might be preferable for players who want additional headroom. The Ultra preset at 4K averages 57 FPS and falls below the playable threshold, making it unsuitable for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.
The Verdict
This PC configuration can run Lockdown Protocol successfully across all three tested resolutions, with specific caveats at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—achieve average frame rates well above 60 FPS, with the lowest performing preset (Ultra) still delivering 121 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with the Ultra preset averaging 89 FPS, confirming that the system is fully capable at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is conditional. The Low preset averages 123 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS, and High averages 76 FPS, all of which are playable. The Ultra preset, however, falls short with an average of 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict data confirms that the playable settings at 4K are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best playable setting at 76 FPS average. Therefore, the system can run the game at 4K, but users must avoid the Ultra preset to maintain smooth, playable frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 874 out of 3714 total combos tested. This places the system in the top 23.5% of all configurations, a strong showing that underscores its capability for this game. The ranking percentile is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows excellent performance at 1080p and 1440p, with only the 4K Ultra preset struggling.
The rank reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU. The Core Ultra 7 265 sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 4070 ranks in the 81st percentile among all GPUs. This combination of high-tier CPU and upper-midrange GPU proves effective for Lockdown Protocol, a game that appears to benefit from strong single-threaded CPU performance given the high frame rates achieved at lower resolutions. The data suggests that while the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K Ultra, the CPU's headroom allows the system to avoid bottlenecking at lower resolutions, contributing to its favorable overall rank.