Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
249 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
116 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
183 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
55 FPS
6.5ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 73 84 118
1440p QHD 85 113 130 183
1080p Full HD 116 155 177 249

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 155
1920x1080 Low 249
1920x1080 Medium 177
1920x1080 Ultra 116
2560x1440 High 113
2560x1440 Low 183
2560x1440 Medium 130
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Low 118
3840x2160 Medium 84
3840x2160 Ultra 55

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a clear, tiered performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, one where resolution scaling dramatically reshapes the playable envelope. Measured data shows the combo is exceptionally strong at 1080p, very capable at 1440p, and requires deliberate settings choices at 4K to stay comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The following analysis breaks down exactly what the benchmark numbers indicate across resolutions, presets, and hardware roles.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates, with every preset clearing the 60 FPS playability line by a wide margin. The Low preset yields an average of 249 FPS, while Medium averages 177 FPS with a minimum of 151 FPS and a maximum of 204 FPS. High settings drop the average to 155 FPS, and the demanding Ultra preset still maintains an average of 116 FPS. Notably, only the Medium preset reports min/max values in the measured data, suggesting that other presets were recorded with average FPS only; still, the headroom at this resolution is substantial across all settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but begin to show the expected scaling penalty. Low averages 183 FPS, Medium delivers 130 FPS with a minimum of 110 FPS and a maximum of 149 FPS, and High sits at 113 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, still produces an average of 85 FPS, keeping it comfortably above 60 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 98 FPS, indicating that visual fidelity comes at a significant but manageable cost.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens noticeably. Low averages 118 FPS, Medium averages 84 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 96 FPS, and High drops to 73 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to an average of 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This marks the only resolution in the dataset where a preset fails to meet the playability line. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 63 FPS, a larger proportional drop than seen at lower resolutions, highlighting the GPU's diminishing returns as pixel count rises.

Across all three resolutions, the Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data, providing a useful consistency check. At 1080p, the 151 FPS minimum versus the 177 FPS average shows a tight frame delivery. At 1440p, the 110 FPS minimum against a 130 FPS average reveals similar stability. At 4K, the 71 FPS minimum with an 84 FPS average indicates that even the dips stay well above the playable threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K, with its 55 FPS average, is the single outlier where the hardware cannot sustain smooth gameplay.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling behavior between resolutions points to the GPU as the primary performance governor in Lockdown Protocol. At 1080p, where the CPU has more room to feed frames, the combo achieves 249 FPS on Low, a figure that suggests the RTX 3080 is being pushed hard while the Core Ultra 7 265 keeps pace. The drop from 249 FPS at 1080p Low to 183 FPS at 1440p Low represents a 27% reduction, while the further drop to 118 FPS at 4K Low is a 36% reduction from the 1440p figure. These proportional declines are characteristic of GPU-bound rendering, where pixel count directly taxes the rasterization pipeline.

The CPU's role becomes more evident when examining preset scaling at a fixed resolution. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average from 249 FPS to 116 FPS, a 53% decrease. This large swing indicates that the CPU can deliver extremely high frame rates when the GPU is lightly loaded, but the GPU's workload at Ultra settings becomes the limiting factor. The Core Ultra 7 265, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, provides sufficient headroom so that even at 1080p Ultra, the system does not dip below the 60 FPS line, achieving 116 FPS instead.

At 1440p, the scaling pattern shifts slightly. The 183 FPS Low figure versus the 85 FPS Ultra figure shows a 54% reduction, nearly identical to the 1080p percentage. This similarity suggests that the CPU's influence remains consistent, and the GPU's additional workload from higher resolution is roughly proportional. At 4K, the Low-to-Ultra drop is 53%, again matching the lower resolutions. The consistent percentage drops across all three resolutions imply that the game's settings scale uniformly, and the RTX 3080's compute capability is the determining factor for absolute performance, with the CPU never becoming a bottleneck at any resolution tested.

The measured data reinforces this interpretation through the min/max figures at Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the 151 FPS minimum and 204 FPS maximum span 53 FPS, a wide range that suggests occasional CPU-driven spikes in frame delivery. At 1440p Medium, the 110 FPS minimum and 149 FPS maximum span 39 FPS, a narrower range. At 4K Medium, the 71 FPS minimum and 96 FPS maximum span only 25 FPS. This tightening of the frame range as resolution increases is a classic sign of GPU-bound operation, where the CPU's ability to vary frame production is smoothed out by the GPU's sustained rendering load.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 73 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 55 FPS, so High is the optimal choice for 4K gaming with this hardware. The Medium preset also clears the threshold with 84 FPS, but High offers better visual quality for only a 11 FPS penalty, making it the recommended setting based on the data.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 85 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS line. This means the full visual experience is available at 1440p without compromise. The measured data shows that all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution, so the choice comes down to preference, with Ultra being the clear pick for maximum fidelity.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset produces an average of 116 FPS, again exceeding the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. As with 1440p, every preset is playable at 1080p, and Ultra is the most demanding option that still maintains smooth performance. The 116 FPS average at Ultra provides substantial headroom for frame drops, making it the definitive best setting for this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 4K?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 55, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at 4K is High, with an average of 73 FPS.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 249 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 116 FPS. This represents a 53% reduction in average FPS when switching from Low to Ultra, indicating that the GPU workload increases significantly with higher visual fidelity.

Q: Does the RTX 3080 become the limiting factor at higher resolutions?

A: Yes. The data shows that frame rate drops proportionally with resolution increases, and the min/max ranges at Medium settings narrow from a 53 FPS span at 1080p to a 25 FPS span at 4K. This pattern is consistent with GPU-bound rendering, where the GPU's pixel throughput determines overall performance.

Q: Which resolution offers the best balance of visual quality and performance?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset maintains an average of 85 FPS, which is 25 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. This allows for maximum settings without any performance compromise, making it the most balanced option in the measured data.

Q: How does the CPU contribute to frame delivery in this game?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265's high single-thread and multi-thread capabilities ensure that it never bottlenecks the RTX 3080. Evidence for this is the consistent percentage drop in FPS across presets at all resolutions, which indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, not the CPU.

Q: Is the 60 FPS minimum stable across all playable settings?

A: The only preset with complete min/max data is Medium. At 1080p, the minimum is 151 FPS; at 1440p, it is 110 FPS; and at 4K, it is 71 FPS. All these minimums are above 60 FPS, indicating stable frame delivery for this preset. Other presets lack min/max data, so their stability cannot be directly assessed.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD EPYC 4464P with a score of 64823 and a delta of -0.3%, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F at 64438 with a delta of 0.3%, the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64202 with a delta of 0.7%, and the AMD EPYC 9124 at 65104 with a delta of -0.7%. These processors deliver nearly identical computational performance, meaning a system with any of them paired with the RTX 3080 would likely produce similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the CPU is not the bottleneck in this configuration.

The GPU's nearest rivals present a more complex picture. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 with a delta of -0.3%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250 with a delta of -0.3%, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273 with a delta of -0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276 with a delta of -0.4%. These GPUs are within 0.4% of the RTX 3080's average benchmark score of 23172, suggesting they would deliver nearly identical frame rates in this game. However, the RTX 3080's specific architecture features, such as its 68 ray tracing cores and 272 tensor cores, may not be fully represented in these rival scores, so real-world gaming performance could differ despite similar synthetic benchmarks.

For the specific task of running Lockdown Protocol, the nearest rival GPUs would likely produce comparable FPS figures, but the RTX 3080's higher memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s and 10 GB of GDDR6X memory could give it an edge in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU rivals, being server-class EPYC parts, might have different memory latencies that could affect frame pacing, but the overall benchmark deltas suggest negligible impact on the final frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 1031 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the top 27.8% of all configurations tested for this game. The CPU's percentile ranking of 93 against all CPUs and the GPU's percentile ranking of 68 against all GPUs both contribute to this solid position. The data indicates that this combo outperforms the majority of tested systems, with the CPU being a particularly strong component relative to its peers.

The rank of 1031 suggests that while this hardware is capable, there are 1030 configurations that achieve higher performance in this game. Given that the GPU sits at the 68th percentile, the primary limitation is the graphics card, not the processor. A more powerful GPU would likely push this combo significantly higher in the rankings, whereas a faster CPU would have less impact given the GPU-bound nature of the game.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 can run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS or above at all three tested resolutions, with one exception. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset falls to 55 FPS, but High settings deliver 73 FPS, making the game fully playable at 4K with reduced visual fidelity. At 2560x1440, the system achieves 85 FPS on Ultra, providing the complete experience without compromise. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset reaches 116 FPS, offering exceptional performance with maximum settings.

The verdict is clear: for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combo is more than sufficient, easily clearing the 60 FPS threshold at every preset. For 4K gaming, users should select High settings to maintain smooth gameplay, as Ultra falls just short of the playable line. The data shows that this hardware is well-matched for Lockdown Protocol, with the CPU providing ample headroom and the GPU handling the rendering workload effectively at all but the most demanding 4K preset.