Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

69%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
235 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
109 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
80 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
111 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
6.8ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 11,627

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 69 79 111
1440p QHD 80 107 122 172
1080p Full HD 109 146 167 235

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 146
1920x1080 Low 235
1920x1080 Medium 167
1920x1080 Ultra 109
2560x1440 High 107
2560x1440 Low 172
2560x1440 Medium 122
2560x1440 Ultra 80
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Low 111
3840x2160 Medium 79
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, with 4K remaining viable at reduced settings. Benchmark data shows this pairing consistently exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold across most tested configurations, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and graphical demands increase.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on aggregate benchmark scores, provide context for its processing headroom. The AMD EPYC 4464P sits marginally ahead with an average score of 64,823, a 0.3% advantage over the Core Ultra 7 265's 64,640 average. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F performs nearly identically, trailing by just 0.3% with a score of 64,438. The AMD EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9124 bracket this performance tier, with the 7343 scoring 64,202 (0.7% behind) and the 9124 scoring 65,104 (0.7% ahead). These deltas are negligible for gaming workloads, indicating the Core Ultra 7 265 offers processing power comparable to these server-class alternatives.

On the graphics side, the RX 7800 XT's nearest rivals are notably older or lower-tier products, which is unusual for a modern GPU. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,680, a 0.5% margin over the RX 7800 XT's 11,627 average. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Tesla K20c sit slightly behind at 11,528 (0.9% slower) and 11,479 (1.3% slower) respectively. The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT leads this group with 11,842, 1.8% ahead. This clustering suggests that in synthetic benchmarks, the RX 7800 XT's raw compute scores align with much older architectures, though the measured in-game FPS data for Lockdown Protocol tells a different story about real-world performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is High, delivering an average of 69 FPS. Medium also clears the threshold at 79 FPS average with a minimum of 67 and maximum of 91, while Low reaches 111 FPS average. Ultra falls short at 52 FPS average, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, all four presets achieve playable frame rates. Ultra runs at 80 FPS average, representing the highest visual quality that stays above 60 FPS. High produces 107 FPS, Medium averages 122 FPS with a 104-141 range, and Low reaches 172 FPS. The headroom at this resolution allows players to prioritize visual fidelity without sacrificing performance.

At 1920x1080, the GPU has substantial overhead. Ultra averages 109 FPS, High reaches 146 FPS, Medium hits 167 FPS with minimum and maximum values of 142 and 192 respectively, and Low achieves 235 FPS. All presets comfortably exceed the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p the most flexible resolution for this combination.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how component responsibilities shift. At 3840x2160, dropping from High to Medium reduces average FPS from 69 to 79, a 14.5% improvement, while the jump from Medium to Low yields 111 FPS, a 40.5% gain over High. This steep scaling indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as lowering graphical settings directly translates to higher frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with less dramatic swings. Ultra averages 80 FPS, High 107, Medium 122, and Low 172. The progression from Ultra to Low represents a 115% increase in average FPS, showing that render resolution and preset complexity heavily influence GPU load. The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 150 FPS, as the processor must keep up with the increased draw call throughput.

At 1920x1080, the delta between Low (235 FPS) and Ultra (109 FPS) is 116%, similar to 1440p. However, the absolute frame rates suggest the CPU begins to matter more at this resolution, since the GPU has enough headroom to render frames quickly and the processor's ability to feed the graphics pipeline becomes more relevant. The Core Ultra 7 265's 20-core, 20-thread configuration and 5.30 GHz boost clock provide ample single-thread performance for this task, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol with playable frame rates across all tested resolutions, provided settings are adjusted appropriately. At 3840x2160, High settings produce 69 FPS average, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, while Medium and Low also remain playable at 79 and 111 FPS respectively. Ultra at 4K drops to 52 FPS, below the playability cutoff.

At 2560x1440, every preset is playable. Ultra maintains 80 FPS average, giving players the full visual experience without compromise. The 1440p resolution represents the sweet spot for this combination, balancing image quality and performance.

At 1920x1080, all settings deliver well above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 109 FPS and Low reaching 235 FPS. The verdict is clear: this system handles Lockdown Protocol admirably at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with High or lower presets. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on the RX 7800 XT provides sufficient capacity for the game's texture requirements at high resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming with this hardware?

A: High settings at 3840x2160 produce 69 FPS average, which is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. Ultra drops to 52 FPS, below the playable threshold.

Q: Can this system handle 1440p at maximum settings?

A: Yes, Ultra at 2560x1440 averages 80 FPS. The minimum observed value at Medium settings is 104 FPS, suggesting Ultra would not dip below 60 FPS in typical gameplay.

Q: How much performance headroom exists at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, even Ultra preset averages 109 FPS, more than 80% above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings reach 235 FPS, indicating substantial overhead for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more limiting at 4K?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at 3840x2160. Reducing from High to Low settings improves average FPS from 69 to 111, a 61% increase, demonstrating that graphical load, not processor throughput, constrains performance.

Q: Does the RX 7800 XT's benchmark score reflect its gaming performance?

A: No. The GPU's average benchmark score of 11,627 places it near older cards like the GTX 1660, but measured FPS in Lockdown Protocol shows it handles 1440p Ultra at 80 FPS. Synthetic scores do not always translate directly to game-specific results.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1440p Medium?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 average 122 FPS, with a minimum of 104 FPS and maximum of 141 FPS. This represents a balanced preset for consistent high refresh rates.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3,714 tested hardware combinations in Lockdown Protocol, this pairing ranks 1,235th. This places it in the 67th percentile of all tested systems, indicating solid but not top-tier performance. The ranking reflects the balanced nature of the Core Ultra 7 265 and RX 7800 XT, which together deliver playable frame rates at high settings across all resolutions but do not challenge the highest-performing configurations. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking among all processors contrasts with the GPU's 51st percentile, suggesting the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing's overall standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete FPS data shows consistent performance scaling across resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, High averages 69 FPS, Low 111, and Medium 79 with a minimum of 67 and maximum of 91. Ultra trails at 52 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming requires careful preset selection, with only the most demanding setting falling below playable levels.

At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 80 FPS, High 107, Low 172, and Medium 122 with a 104-141 range. The minimum value at Medium stays well above 60 FPS, providing confidence in frame time consistency. The 1440p results show the RX 7800 XT's 16 GB memory buffer handling the game's assets without issue.

At 1920x1080, the highest frame rates emerge. Ultra averages 109 FPS, High 146, Low 235, and Medium 167 with minimum and maximum values of 142 and 192. These figures demonstrate that 1080p gaming with this hardware leaves significant performance on the table, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate displays up to 144 Hz or beyond at lower presets. The data confirms the RX 7800 XT delivers strong rasterization performance in Lockdown Protocol, while the Core Ultra 7 265 provides sufficient CPU overhead to avoid bottlenecking at any tested resolution.