Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 52 | 74 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 71 | 81 | 114 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 97 | 111 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this PC in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The recorded data shows that 1920x1080 Ultra is fully playable with an average of 72 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High with 71 FPS average. At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 74 FPS.
Q: Does this combo hit 60 FPS at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset reaches 60 FPS or more, averaging 74 FPS. Medium averages 52 FPS, High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra drops to 34 FPS, so 4K gaming requires a significant settings reduction.
Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its closest rivals in CPU benchmarks?
A: The Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640 in the database's average benchmark score. It sits 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (64,438), 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343 (64,202), 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P (64,823), and 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9124 (65,104). The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile among all tested CPUs.
Q: Where does the RX 5700 XT stand relative to its GPU rivals?
A: The Radeon RX 5700 XT has an average benchmark score of 16,361, putting it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. It is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351, only 0.1% difference), and sits 0.3% behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408) and 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 leads this group at 16,504, a 0.9% gap.
Q: Which component is more responsible for performance at 1440p?
A: The data indicates the GPU becomes the primary constraint as resolution rises. At 2560x1440, dropping from High to Low only improves the average from 71 FPS to 114 FPS, while at 1920x1080 the same drop goes from 97 FPS to 156 FPS. The CPU is strong enough (93rd percentile) that the RX 5700 XT's 59th percentile placement is the limiting factor in higher resolution scenarios.
Q: How many tested combinations does this PC rank above in Lockdown Protocol?
A: This combo ranks 2,759 out of 3,714 tested combinations in the game, meaning it sits above roughly 955 tested configurations. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the database's tested hardware pool for this title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265's nearest rivals in the database are all server-class processors, which is unusual for a desktop gaming build. The AMD EPYC 4464P trails by just 0.3% in average benchmark score, making it a near-identical match for CPU-bound tasks. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is only 0.3% ahead, which is within run-to-run variance; these two chips are effectively interchangeable for Lockdown Protocol. The AMD EPYC 7343 and AMD EPYC 9124 sit 0.7% on either side of the Core Ultra 7 265, so any of these four CPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in this game.
On the GPU side, the RX 5700 XT's closest neighbors are a mixed bag. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M matches it within 0.1%, meaning a system with that mobile workstation GPU would behave almost identically in Lockdown Protocol. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 are both 0.3% ahead, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 leads by 0.9%. None of these deltas exceed one percent, so all five GPUs would deliver essentially the same frame pacing and average performance in this title.
For a user considering alternatives, the practical takeaway is that swapping the Core Ultra 7 265 for any of its four nearest CPU rivals would not change the gaming experience. Likewise, moving to any of the RX 5700 XT's nearest GPU rivals would keep performance within a rounding error. The bottleneck structure of the system would remain identical, and the verdict at each resolution would stay the same.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. The Low preset averages 156 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure for this combo in any configuration. Medium averages 111 FPS with a minimum of 94 FPS and a maximum of 127 FPS. High averages 97 FPS, and Ultra averages 72 FPS. Every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS playability threshold, and even the heaviest setting maintains a comfortable margin above it.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable across most presets. Low averages 114 FPS, Medium averages 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS, and High averages 71 FPS. Ultra falls below the 60 FPS line at 53 FPS average. The gap between Low and High at 1440p is 43 FPS, showing that settings scaling still has a meaningful impact at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes substantially. Low averages 74 FPS, which is the only playable preset at 4K. Medium averages 52 FPS with a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 60 FPS. High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 22 FPS, and the step from Medium to High costs another 6 FPS. Ultra is nearly half the frame rate of Low, confirming that the RX 5700 XT's 8 GB GDDR6 buffer and RDNA 1.0 architecture are stretched at 4K.
The measured data shows a clear pattern: resolution scaling is steep, while settings scaling is moderate. From 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra, the average drops from 72 FPS to 53 FPS, a 19 FPS loss. From 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra, the average drops from 53 FPS to 34 FPS, another 19 FPS loss. The Low preset tells a similar story: 156 FPS at 1080p, 114 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra averages 72 FPS, which is the highest quality setting at the most common gaming resolution, and it does so with no minimum FPS recorded below the playability line. This is the configuration's sweet spot.
At 2560x1440, High is the best playable preset with 71 FPS average. Medium also clears 60 FPS at 81 FPS, and Low runs at 114 FPS. Ultra drops to 53 FPS, which misses the 60 FPS mark. Users with 1440p displays should stick to High or Medium for a smooth experience.
At 3840x2160, only Low is playable, averaging 74 FPS. Medium falls to 52 FPS, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS. The verdict is straightforward: 4K owners must accept Low settings or drop to a lower resolution. The database's verdictByResolution data confirms that Low is the best settings choice at 4K, with an average of 74 FPS.
The overall verdict is that this combo is a capable 1080p and 1440p machine for Lockdown Protocol, but it is not a 4K gaming system beyond minimal settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The Core Ultra 7 265 is a high-end desktop processor with 20 cores, 20 threads, and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It ranks in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The RX 5700 XT, by contrast, sits in the 59th percentile among GPUs. This imbalance suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios.
The scaling data supports this. At 1080p, where CPU overhead is most visible, the system reaches 156 FPS on Low and 72 FPS on Ultra. The 84 FPS spread between those presets is driven primarily by GPU workload, since the CPU has ample headroom. At 4K, the spread between Low (74 FPS) and Ultra (34 FPS) is 40 FPS, again pointing to GPU-bound rendering. The CPU's role is more prominent at lower resolutions and lower settings, where frame rates are high enough to expose per-thread overhead.
Resolution scaling further clarifies the division of labor. The Core Ultra 7 265's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 5,960 Cinebench R23 single-core score, means it can feed the GPU efficiently even at high frame rates. But as resolution increases, the RX 5700 XT's pixel throughput becomes the wall. The GPU's 9.754 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results show it running out of headroom.
The database's measured FPS values show that at 1440p Medium, the system holds a 69 FPS minimum, which suggests the GPU is still managing consistent frame delivery. At 4K Medium, the minimum drops to 44 FPS, indicating the GPU is struggling to sustain frame pacing. The CPU is not the culprit; its 93rd percentile rank and 64,640 average benchmark score place it far above what Lockdown Protocol requires.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database's tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing ranks 2,759 out of 3,714. That places it in the 74th percentile of tested combos, meaning roughly one in four tested systems performs worse. It is a below-average position for a system with a 93rd percentile CPU, which reinforces the conclusion that the RX 5700 XT is holding the combo back.
The rank reflects real-world gameplay, not just synthetic scores. The Core Ultra 7 265's 42,216 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 5,960 single-core score are strong, but the RX 5700 XT's 16,277 Passmark G3D score and 2,134 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score limit the system's overall standing. The GPU's 59th percentile placement among all GPUs is the anchor.
For context, the combo's rank means it outperforms 955 other tested configurations, but it also trails 2,759. In a fast-paced FPS like Lockdown Protocol, where frame consistency matters, the 4K Medium minimum of 44 FPS and the 1440p Ultra average of 53 FPS are the weak points. The 1080p results, however, are competitive, with Ultra averaging 72 FPS and Low reaching 156 FPS.
The takeaway is that this system is a solid 1080p performer, a good 1440p performer on High or Medium, and a marginal 4K performer on Low only. Its rank in the database reflects that split personality: the CPU is overqualified for the GPU's capabilities, and the GPU is the reason the combo does not climb higher in the rankings.