Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 52 | 74 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 71 | 81 | 114 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 97 | 111 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
# Can Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + AMD Radeon 8050S Run Lockdown Protocol?
Lockdown Protocol, a 2024-released FPS title, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with resolution and quality settings. The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H mobile processor and the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated graphics produces measurable performance data across three resolutions and four presets. The data indicates this combo is playable at 1080p with all settings, at 1440p up to High, and at 4K only on Low. The combo ranks 2746 out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-mid range of the database, though the GPU itself sits at the 89th percentile among all GPUs while the CPU is at the 84th percentile.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gameplay?
A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 73 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding setting that remains playable at this resolution.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?
A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 74 FPS. Medium drops to 52 FPS average, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Core Ultra 7 165H has an average benchmark score of 34083. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H scores 33989, a 0.3% difference. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220 (-0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222 (-0.4%).
Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?
A: The AMD Radeon 8050S ranks in the 89th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62108 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests.
Q: Which resolution provides the highest average FPS?
A: The 1920x1080 Low preset delivers the highest measured average at 156 FPS, followed by 1440p Low at 114 FPS and 4K Low at 74 FPS.
Q: Is the 1440p Medium preset stable?
A: Yes, 2560x1440 Medium averages 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS and maximum of 93 FPS, maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 73 FPS, while the Low preset reaches 156 FPS — a 113% improvement. This wide gap indicates the Radeon 8050S has ample headroom at lower resolutions but is saturated by the computational demands of higher settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern persists but with compressed margins. Low averages 114 FPS, High 71 FPS, and Ultra drops to 53 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at High settings reduces average FPS from 97 to 71, a 27% decline. This suggests the GPU's rendering throughput — rated at 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate — is increasingly taxed by the additional pixels.
At 3840x2160, the GPU bottleneck becomes severe. The Medium preset averages 52 FPS with a minimum of 45 FPS and maximum of 60 FPS, while Ultra falls to 34 FPS. The jump from 1440p Medium (81 FPS) to 4K Medium (52 FPS) represents a 36% performance drop, despite the resolution increase being 2.25x in pixel count. This non-linear scaling indicates memory bandwidth constraints, as the Radeon 8050S uses System Shared memory with bandwidth described as "System Dependent."
The CPU's role is consistent across all resolutions, as its 16 cores and 22 threads with a 5.00 GHz boost clock provide sufficient processing headroom. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14551 and PassMark multithread score of 25933 demonstrate strong multi-threaded capability, which matters for Lockdown Protocol's physics and game logic. However, the data shows that resolution scaling impacts FPS far more than preset changes within a resolution, confirming the GPU as the limiting factor at 1440p and above.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 2746 out of 3714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 26th percentile of all combos. This ranking reflects the mobile-oriented nature of both components: the Core Ultra 7 165H is a 28W TDP mobile processor, and the Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU with a 55W TDP. Despite their modest power envelopes, the GPU's 89th percentile ranking among all GPUs and the CPU's 84th percentile ranking suggest the combo outperforms its position in this specific game.
The discrepancy between component percentiles and game-specific ranking indicates Lockdown Protocol is particularly demanding. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% higher score), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (-2.5%), AMD Radeon RX 7600M (-2.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (-2.7%). These comparisons show the 8050S sits in a tight performance cluster, with less than 3% separating four comparable GPUs.
The CPU's nearest rivals paint a similar picture: the Core Ultra 5 338H is 0.3% higher, while the EPYC 4244P, Ryzen AI 7 350, and Ryzen 7 3700X are all within 0.5% lower. This clustering suggests that swapping to any of these alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the game's performance is more sensitive to GPU capability than CPU differences within this performance band.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS or higher in several configurations, but the playable envelope shrinks rapidly with resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages 73 FPS, providing the best visual quality at this resolution. At 2560x1440, three presets are playable: Low (114 FPS), Medium (81 FPS), and High (71 FPS). The Ultra preset at 53 FPS falls short of the 60 FPS target.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 74 FPS. Medium drops to 52 FPS, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS. The verdict data confirms 4K gaming is possible but requires significant visual compromises. For users prioritizing smooth gameplay, 1080p Ultra or 1440p High represent the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance. The minimum FPS data for Medium presets shows 94 FPS at 1080p, 69 FPS at 1440p, and 45 FPS at 4K, indicating frame pacing remains stable even in demanding scenes at lower resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have four nearest rivals that would deliver nearly identical performance in Lockdown Protocol. For the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H is the closest match with a 0.3% higher average benchmark score. The AMD EPYC 4244P and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 are both 0.4% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is 0.5% lower. These differences are negligible in gaming contexts, where the GPU typically dominates frame time variance.
For the AMD Radeon 8050S, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 0.3% higher in average benchmark score, making it the closest equivalent. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2.5% lower, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is 2.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is 2.7% lower. Users considering any of these GPU alternatives should expect frame rates within 3% of the measured values in this analysis, meaning the playable settings per resolution would remain identical.
Combining the CPU and GPU rival lists, a system with a Core Ultra 5 338H and a Radeon Pro W6600M would produce nearly indistinguishable results from the tested configuration. Similarly, pairing the Core Ultra 7 165H with a Radeon RX 7600M would yield slightly lower performance — approximately 2.6% — which would not change the verdict at any resolution.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers the best visual quality while maintaining 73 FPS average, well above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the recommended configuration for full HD gaming. At 2560x1440, the High preset provides the highest quality playable experience at 71 FPS average. Choosing Medium would increase performance to 81 FPS but reduces visual fidelity; the data shows High remains comfortably playable. At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only option that clears 60 FPS, averaging 74 FPS. This requires the most significant visual compromise but enables 4K gameplay.
The measured FPS data shows clear tiering: 1080p offers the most flexibility with all presets playable, 1440p offers a three-preset range, and 4K is restricted to Low. The jump from 1440p High (71 FPS) to 4K Low (74 FPS) demonstrates that resolution has a greater impact than preset selection on this hardware.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 156 FPS, Medium averages 111 FPS with a minimum of 94 FPS and maximum of 127 FPS, High averages 97 FPS, and Ultra averages 73 FPS. All presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with even the minimum FPS at Medium (94 FPS) remaining well above playable levels.
At 2560x1440, Low averages 114 FPS, Medium averages 81 FPS (minimum 69 FPS, maximum 93 FPS), High averages 71 FPS, and Ultra averages 53 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 69 FPS indicates stable performance, while High's 71 FPS average suggests occasional dips below 60 FPS are possible but unlikely to be frequent.
At 3840x2160, Low averages 74 FPS, Medium averages 52 FPS (minimum 45 FPS, maximum 60 FPS), High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS. The Medium preset's maximum of 60 FPS and minimum of 45 FPS reveals significant frame time variance, making it unsuitable for consistent 60 FPS gameplay despite its 52 FPS average. The data across all resolutions shows a consistent pattern: each preset step down from Ultra to Low yields progressively larger FPS gains, with the largest improvements occurring at higher resolutions where the GPU is more stressed.