Lockdown Protocol

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 880M combination presents a specific performance profile for Lockdown Protocol, one that is heavily constrained by the integrated graphics solution. The data shows a system that can handle the game at 1080p with reduced settings, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at higher resolutions. Benchmark results indicate a clear hierarchy where the GPU is the primary limiting factor, with the CPU’s substantial multi-threaded capabilities providing a strong foundation that the graphics subsystem cannot fully utilize in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H show that its overall processing power sits within a narrow band of comparable CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14600T posts an average benchmark score of 32707, a 0% difference from the Core Ultra 7 155H’s score. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is nearly identical at 32662, just 0.1% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H trails slightly at 32812, a 0.4% difference. These deltas are negligible, meaning the CPU’s performance in synthetic workloads is effectively interchangeable with these four alternatives. For Lockdown Protocol, any of these processors would deliver the same baseline computational performance, leaving the GPU as the decisive factor.

On the graphics side, the AMD Radeon 880M’s nearest rivals are all older discrete mobile GPUs, which contextualizes its performance level. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX scores 8427, just 0.1% behind the Radeon 880M’s average of 8436. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 0.3% ahead at 8458, and the AMD Radeon HD 8870M also sits 0.3% ahead at 8462. The AMD Radeon R9 M375X trails by 1.3% with a score of 8325. These comparisons reveal that the integrated Radeon 880M performs in the same class as these older discrete parts, which are not known for high-end gaming. Users coming from any of these GPUs would see nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, meaning the experience would not improve or degrade significantly with this combination.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets clearly demonstrates that the AMD Radeon 880M is the dominant constraint for Lockdown Protocol. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 35 FPS on Low settings to 16 FPS on Ultra, a 54% reduction. This steep decline with increasing graphical load points directly to GPU throughput limitations. The CPU’s role is secondary, as its processing power remains largely static while the GPU struggles to keep up with pixel and shading demands. The Core Ultra 7 155H, with its 16 cores and 22 threads, provides ample headroom for game logic and physics, but that headroom is irrelevant when the graphics pipeline cannot deliver frames fast enough.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues. The average FPS ranges from 54 on Low to 25 on Ultra, a 54% drop from the lowest to highest preset. This consistent scaling ratio across resolutions indicates that the GPU’s fill rate and shading capacity are the bottlenecks. The CPU’s performance, which would typically show more variation at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, remains sufficient even at 1080p. At 1920x1080, the spread from 74 FPS on Low to 35 FPS on Ultra shows the same GPU-bound behavior. The CPU does not exhibit signs of being a limiting factor at any resolution, as the frame rate consistently tracks the graphical settings rather than the computational load.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average frame rate is 35 FPS at Low settings, which falls far short. Medium settings produce 25 FPS, High drops to 22 FPS, and Ultra manages only 16 FPS. The data indicates that this resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay, regardless of settings.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly but still fails to meet the threshold. The best result is 54 FPS at Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS target. Medium settings average 39 FPS, High averages 34 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. None of these presets provide a playable experience according to the benchmark’s 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset is the only one that clears 60 FPS, averaging 74 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution. Medium settings average 53 FPS, which is below the threshold, High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS. The data shows that 1080p with Low settings is the sole configuration that meets the playability criterion.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but only under specific conditions. According to the verdict by resolution, 3840x2160 has no playable settings, meaning the game cannot be played smoothly at 4K. Similarly, 2560x1440 has no playable settings, with all presets falling below 60 FPS. The only resolution that clears the threshold is 1920x1080, where the Low preset achieves an average of 74 FPS. This is the single playable configuration for this combination.

The data shows that while the game is technically runnable, the experience is highly restricted. Users must accept 1080p resolution and the lowest graphical preset to achieve smooth frame rates. Medium settings at 1080p average 53 FPS, which is close but still below the 60 FPS target. The GPU’s performance ceiling prevents any higher settings or resolutions from being viable. This system is suitable for players who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity and are willing to run the game at minimal graphical quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured results show a clear degradation with increasing settings. The Low preset averages 35 FPS, while Medium averages 25 FPS with a minimum of 21 and a maximum of 29. High settings average 22 FPS, and Ultra averages 16 FPS. The minimum and maximum values for Medium indicate a narrow frame time range, suggesting consistent performance rather than spikes.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 54 FPS, which is the best result at this resolution. Medium averages 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 and a maximum of 44. High settings average 34 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. The frame range for Medium shows some variability, but the overall performance remains below the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 74 FPS, the only result above 60 FPS. Medium averages 53 FPS, with a minimum of 45 and a maximum of 61. The maximum of 61 FPS for Medium is notable, as it briefly touches the playable threshold, but the average remains below. High settings average 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS. These numbers confirm that the GPU’s performance drops off sharply with each increase in graphical fidelity.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 880M ranks 3627 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the bottom 2.3% of all configurations, indicating that it is one of the weaker systems tested for this game. The low rank is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows the GPU struggling to maintain playable frame rates at most settings. The CPU’s strong performance does not compensate for the GPU’s limitations, as the game’s rendering demands overwhelm the integrated graphics solution.

This rank is a direct reflection of the Radeon 880M’s position in the overall GPU hierarchy. With a percentile of 43 against all GPUs, it sits below the median, and its nearest rivals are older discrete mobile parts. The combination’s rank suggests that for Lockdown Protocol, this system is suitable only for low-resolution, low-detail gaming. Users with this hardware should expect a below-average experience compared to the broader pool of tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset, which averages 74 FPS. All other resolutions and presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: There are no playable settings at 2560x1440. The best result is the Low preset, which averages 54 FPS, below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the Radeon 880M compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Radeon 880M scores 8436, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX at 8427 and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8458. It is 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M375X.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck. Frame rates scale directly with graphical settings across all resolutions, while the CPU’s processing power remains sufficient and does not limit performance.

Q: What is the maximum FPS achievable at 3840x2160?

A: The maximum average FPS at 3840x2160 is 35, achieved with the Low preset. The Ultra preset averages only 16 FPS.

Q: What rank does this combination hold among tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 3627 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the bottom 2.3% of all configurations.