Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

54%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
25 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
40 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
18 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
26 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
12 FPS
29.4ms Frame Time
44ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 32,697
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 6,019

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 12 16 18 26
1440p QHD 18 25 28 40
1080p Full HD 25 34 39 54

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 34
1920x1080 Low 54
1920x1080 Medium 39
1920x1080 Ultra 25
2560x1440 High 25
2560x1440 Low 40
2560x1440 Medium 28
2560x1440 Ultra 18
3840x2160 High 16
3840x2160 Low 26
3840x2160 Medium 18
3840x2160 Ultra 12

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H pairs with the AMD Radeon 760M integrated graphics, creating a mobile platform that is heavily GPU-bound in Lockdown Protocol. The CPU, a 16-core Meteor Lake part with 22 threads and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, yet the system's frame rates are dictated almost entirely by the Radeon 760M, which sits in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. This combination is positioned near the very bottom of the tested combos for this game, ranking 3702 out of 3714, indicating that while the processor is capable, the graphics solution severely limits playability. The benchmark data reveals a consistent pattern: at no tested resolution or preset does this system reach the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it a configuration suited for low-demanding titles or significantly reduced graphical expectations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for both components clarifies the expected performance envelope for this combination. For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s average benchmark score of 32697 is virtually identical to several other processors. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, a delta of 0%, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, putting the Ultra 7 155H just 0.1% ahead. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750, which is 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, a 0.4% advantage. These deltas are negligible, meaning that swapping the Ultra 7 155H for any of these rivals would produce no meaningful change in Lockdown Protocol's performance, as the CPU is not the bottleneck.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon 760M’s average benchmark score of 6019 places it alongside some disparate hardware. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 scores 6001, a 0.3% difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M scores 6000, also 0.3% higher. Interestingly, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server appears in this list with a score of 5996, a 0.4% delta, though this is likely a misidentification of an integrated or low-power variant given its score. The NVIDIA Quadro P2000 scores 6049, which is 0.5% higher. For gaming, this means that any of these GPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, all falling well short of the 60 FPS target. Users with a system containing any of these GPUs paired with a similar-tier CPU should expect the same sub-60 FPS experience across all settings.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 760M achieve 60 FPS in Lockdown Protocol?

A: No. The measured FPS data shows that at every tested resolution (3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080) and every settings preset (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), the average frame rate remains below the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average recorded is 54 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: What is the best-case scenario for this hardware in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The best-case scenario is at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings, where the system achieves an average of 54 FPS. This is the closest the combination gets to the 60 FPS playable threshold, but it still falls short. All other settings at this resolution yield lower averages, such as 39 FPS on Medium and 34 FPS on High.

Q: How does this system perform at 1440p resolution?

A: At 2560x1440, performance drops further. The highest average FPS is 40 with Low settings, while Medium delivers 28 FPS, High delivers 25 FPS, and Ultra drops to 18 FPS. None of these configurations provide a smooth, playable experience for a fast-paced FPS title.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for this combo?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong processing power. In contrast, the AMD Radeon 760M ranks in the 35th percentile among GPUs. The low GPU performance relative to the CPU’s capability means that frame rates in Lockdown Protocol are constrained by the integrated graphics, not the processor.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded for this combo?

A: The data includes min and max FPS only for Medium settings at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the range is 15 to 21 FPS. At 2560x1440, the range is 24 to 32 FPS. At 1920x1080, the range is 33 to 44 FPS. For Low, High, and Ultra presets, only average FPS values are provided.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems for Lockdown Protocol?

A: This combination ranks 3702 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 0.3% of all systems tested, confirming that it is one of the least capable configurations for this game, primarily due to the weak integrated GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how this system handles Lockdown Protocol across different resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160 (4K), performance is uniformly poor. The average frame rates are 26 FPS on Low, 18 FPS on Medium, 16 FPS on High, and 12 FPS on Ultra. The only min/max data available at this resolution is for Medium, showing a range from 15 to 21 FPS. These figures confirm that 4K gaming is entirely out of reach, as even the lowest settings fail to approach a playable frame rate.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves slightly but remains below playability. Low settings yield an average of 40 FPS, Medium averages 28 FPS, High averages 25 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. The Medium preset shows a min of 24 FPS and a max of 32 FPS. While the Low preset at 40 FPS is technically smoother, it still falls 20 FPS short of the 60 FPS target, making it unsuitable for competitive or fast-paced gameplay.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the best performance is observed, though still not playable by the 60 FPS standard. Low settings achieve an average of 54 FPS, which is the highest across all tests. Medium averages 39 FPS, with a min of 33 and max of 44. High averages 34 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is significant, with a 15 FPS drop, indicating that the Radeon 760M struggles with even moderate graphical demands. Across all resolutions and presets, the data consistently shows that this system cannot sustain 60 FPS, with the 1080p Low setting being the only configuration approaching a usable frame rate.

The Verdict

The verdict is unambiguous: this PC cannot run Lockdown Protocol at a playable level. The verdictByResolution data lists no playable settings at any resolution—3840x2160, 2560x1440, or 1920x1080—meaning there is no preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average FPS recorded is 54 at 1080p Low, which is 6 FPS short of the target. At 1440p, the best is 40 FPS on Low, and at 4K, the best is 26 FPS on Low. Even at the lowest resolution and settings, the system fails to deliver a consistent 60 FPS experience. For a game in the FPS genre, where frame rate is critical for responsiveness and accuracy, this hardware configuration is not suitable. Users would need to significantly lower the internal rendering resolution or accept a sub-60 FPS experience, which is not recommended for competitive play.

Best Settings per Resolution

Given the constraint of staying at or above 60 FPS, there are no optimal settings to recommend. The data shows that the system never reaches this threshold, so the "best" settings are those that produce the highest average FPS, even if they fall short. At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that yields the highest average is Low, with 26 FPS, but this is far from the 60 FPS goal. At 2560x1440, Low settings again provide the best result at 40 FPS. At 1920x1080, Low settings achieve 54 FPS. In all cases, these are the only presets worth considering, as Medium, High, and Ultra all result in lower averages that are even further from playability. Since no preset meets the 60 FPS requirement, the recommendation is to use Low settings at 1080p for the least poor experience, acknowledging that it still does not meet the playable threshold. No higher preset can be recommended, as the drop to Medium at 1080p reduces the average by 15 FPS, making the game feel noticeably less fluid.

How This Combo Ranks

This hardware combination ranks 3702 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the bottom percentile. This ranking reflects the severe limitation imposed by the AMD Radeon 760M, which is an integrated GPU designed for basic tasks rather than demanding gaming. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, by contrast, is a high-end mobile processor that ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, but its power is wasted in this pairing. The data shows that the system is overwhelmingly GPU-bound, and the 760M simply lacks the raw performance to drive modern FPS titles. Compared to other tested systems, this combo is nearly at the very bottom, indicating that almost any discrete GPU, even entry-level ones, would provide a better experience. Users considering this configuration for Lockdown Protocol should look elsewhere, as the benchmark results are unequivocal: this system is not capable of delivering a playable frame rate under any tested conditions.