Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
313 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
146 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
230 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
69 FPS
5.2ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 46,062
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 49,957

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 69 92 105 148
1440p QHD 107 142 163 230
1080p Full HD 146 194 223 313

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 194
1920x1080 Low 313
1920x1080 Medium 223
1920x1080 Ultra 146
2560x1440 High 142
2560x1440 Low 230
2560x1440 Medium 163
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 92
3840x2160 Low 148
3840x2160 Medium 105
3840x2160 Ultra 69

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti delivers a commanding performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, with the data showing that this combination is not merely capable but decisively overqualified for high-refresh-rate gaming across all common resolutions. The benchmark results reveal a system that consistently doubles the 60 FPS playability threshold at 1440p and approaches triple-digit frame rates even at 4K with maximum settings, positioning it as a high-end pairing that prioritizes headroom over compromise.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination shows a clear hierarchy of performance across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system operates at extraordinary frame rates: Low settings produce an average of 313 FPS, Medium yields 223 FPS with a minimum of 189 and maximum of 256, High delivers 194 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a robust 146 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is substantial — 313 versus 146 — indicating that even the most demanding preset leaves significant performance on the table.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain remarkably high. Low settings average 230 FPS, Medium produces 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 and maximum of 188, High reaches 142 FPS, and Ultra drops to 107 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction of roughly 25-30% across presets, which is a moderate penalty that still leaves every settings tier well above the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum FPS figures at Medium settings — 139 at 1440p and 189 at 1080p — suggest that even frame-time dips stay comfortably in high-refresh territory.

At 3840x2160, the system's limits begin to show, though they remain impressive. Ultra settings average 69 FPS, which is the lowest figure recorded for this pairing but still clears the playability threshold by a meaningful margin. High settings average 92 FPS, Medium reaches 105 FPS with a minimum of 90 and maximum of 121, and Low jumps to 148 FPS. The 4K data reveals a steeper drop from High to Ultra — 92 to 69 FPS, a 25% reduction — compared to the 1440p High-to-Ultra transition from 142 to 107 FPS, which is a 24.6% reduction. This suggests the Ultra preset at 4K is where the GPU finally encounters meaningful workload pressure.

The most striking observation is the consistency of the Medium preset data points, which are the only entries with complete min/max values. At all three resolutions, the minimum FPS at Medium stays remarkably close to the average — 90 minimum versus 105 average at 4K, 139 versus 163 at 1440p, and 189 versus 223 at 1080p — indicating stable frame pacing without severe hitches.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling behavior across resolutions and presets reveals a clear picture of component roles in Lockdown Protocol. The transition from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows the GPU becoming progressively more dominant, as expected in a title where resolution drives rendering load. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 313 FPS, which suggests the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is capable of feeding the RTX 5070 Ti at extreme frame rates without bottlenecking — the CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, appear sufficient to sustain this output.

However, the data implies that the CPU's influence wanes as resolution increases. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 69 is nearly half the 1080p Ultra figure of 146, a 52.7% reduction that points to GPU-bound operation. The CPU's benchmark scores reinforce this interpretation: its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and single-core score of 2085 place it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong headroom for game logic and physics at any resolution.

The preset scaling within each resolution provides further evidence of GPU dominance. At 1440p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS from 230 to 107, a 53.5% drop that reflects the GPU's workload increasing with visual fidelity. At 1080p, the same Low-to-Ultra transition goes from 313 to 146, a 53.4% reduction. These nearly identical percentages across resolutions suggest the CPU is not the limiting factor — if it were, the percentage drop would narrow at higher resolutions where the GPU takes longer per frame, giving the CPU more time to prepare work. Instead, the consistent scaling indicates the RTX 5070 Ti's 8960 shading units and 70 RT cores are the primary drivers of performance changes.

The one anomaly worth questioning is the 4K High-to-Ultra transition. The 23 FPS drop from 92 to 69 is proportionally larger than the 1080p High-to-Ultra drop from 194 to 146 (48 FPS, a 24.7% reduction) or the 1440p High-to-Ultra drop from 142 to 107 (35 FPS, a 24.6% reduction). The 4K Ultra preset appears to introduce a rendering cost that scales super-linearly, likely due to memory bandwidth pressure — the GPU's 896.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR7 memory are substantial, but 4K Ultra demands push closer to capacity.

FAQ

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with the highest settings?

A: Yes. The data shows 3840x2160 Ultra settings averaging 69 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold by 15%. The minimum FPS at 4K is only recorded for Medium settings at 90 FPS, so Ultra frame dips are not quantified, but the average margin suggests consistent playability.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to its nearest GPU rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 49957, placing it in the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, scores 50001 (a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti is effectively tied). The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, which is 2% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477, which is 3.1% lower. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, 0.4% below.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings average 230 FPS while Ultra settings average 107 FPS — a difference of 123 FPS, meaning Ultra delivers only 46.5% of the Low preset's frame rate. Medium sits between at 163 FPS, and High at 142 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU dominates even at 1080p. The Low-to-Ultra FPS drop at 1080p is 53.4% (313 to 146), nearly identical to the 1440p drop of 53.5% (230 to 107), indicating the CPU maintains sufficient headroom and the GPU's workload scaling drives performance changes.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 rank against its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 46062, placing it in the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, scores 46030 (a deltaPct of 0.1% higher for the Intel). The Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, which is 0.1% higher than the Ultra 5 235, while the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0.2% lower) and the AMD EPYC 7303 scores 45960 (0.2% lower).

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming if prioritizing frame rate over visual quality?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 Low settings at 313 FPS average, which is the highest recorded figure for this system. Medium settings at 223 FPS offer a balance with a minimum of 189 FPS, while High at 194 FPS and Ultra at 146 FPS remain well above 60 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores provide context for what other processors would deliver similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, with an average score of 46030, is within 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235's 46062, meaning game performance would be virtually indistinguishable. The Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, also within 0.1%, despite being a mobile part that might thermally throttle in sustained workloads. The AMD EPYC 4364P and EPYC 7303, scoring 45970 and 45960 respectively, are each within 0.2% — these server-oriented chips would produce nearly identical FPS in this title, though their platform requirements differ substantially.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which scores 50001 versus 49957, a deltaPct of -0.1% meaning the two are effectively tied in raw compute benchmarks. In practice, the RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and modern architecture would likely yield better frame pacing, but the average scores suggest similar peak throughput. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, 2% higher, which would translate to roughly 2% higher FPS in Lockdown Protocol — at 1080p Ultra, that would mean approximately 149 FPS versus the measured 146. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477, 3.1% lower, suggesting it would produce around 142 FPS at 1080p Ultra, still comfortably above 60 FPS.

The Intel Arc A550M, scoring 49737 (0.4% lower), would be the closest-performing alternative, though its mobile form factor and driver ecosystem differ from the desktop RTX 5070 Ti. For a system builder, the data indicates that swapping in any of these rival GPUs would keep the system within a narrow performance band — none of them would push the frame rates below the 60 FPS threshold at any resolution tested.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ranks 341st out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 9.2% of all configurations in the database. This percentile position is notable given that the CPU ranks in the 89th percentile and the GPU in the 86th percentile individually — the combined rank is slightly higher than either component's standalone placement, suggesting the pairing is well-balanced for this specific title.

The rank of 341 is particularly impressive when considering the database includes many higher-end configurations. The fact that this combo sits in the top tenth of all tested systems, while neither component cracks the top 10% individually, implies that Lockdown Protocol rewards the specific balance this pairing offers — sufficient CPU single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085) and massive GPU throughput (43.94 TFLOPS FP32) without an obvious bottleneck. The 3714 total combos mean there are 3373 tested configurations that rank lower, giving this system a clear performance advantage over the vast majority of setups.

The data also reveals that the combo's rank is not simply a sum of its parts. A CPU in the 89th percentile combined with a GPU in the 86th percentile might naively be expected to rank around the 85th-88th percentile of combos, but the actual 9.2% position (91st percentile) suggests a synergistic effect. This could be due to the RTX 5070 Ti's 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth being well-matched to the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support at 102.4 GB/s, preventing any memory subsystem from becoming a limiting factor.

The Verdict

This PC can definitively run Lockdown Protocol at all tested resolutions and presets, exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold everywhere. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: at 3840x2160, all four settings — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable, with Ultra averaging 69 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same full range is playable, with Ultra hitting 107 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset clears 60 FPS by a wide margin, with Low at 313 FPS and Ultra at 146 FPS.

The strongest verdict is at 1440p, where the system delivers 107 FPS at Ultra settings, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors without sacrificing visual quality. At 4K, the 69 FPS Ultra result is playable but leaves less headroom for frame dips; the Medium preset at 105 FPS with a 90 FPS minimum would be the safer choice for competitive play. Even at 1080p Ultra, the 146 FPS average comfortably supports 144 Hz displays, and dropping to High yields 194 FPS for 165 Hz or 240 Hz panels.

The data confirms that this system is over-specified for 1080p gaming, where even the most demanding preset doubles the 60 FPS threshold. The only scenario where the system approaches its limits is 4K Ultra, but it still clears the threshold by 15%. There is no resolution or settings combination in the measured data that falls below 60 FPS average, making this a universally playable configuration.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 69 FPS. This is the maximum settings option available in the data, and it clears the threshold by 9 FPS. Players who prefer extra safety margin could drop to High for 92 FPS, but the Ultra average of 69 FPS is above the playable threshold and represents the highest visual fidelity available.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, averaging 107 FPS. This provides a 47 FPS buffer over the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for demanding scenes or future patches that might reduce performance. The 107 FPS average also aligns well with 100 Hz and 120 Hz displays, making this resolution the sweet spot for this configuration.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings average 146 FPS, which is the best choice for maximum visual quality while still delivering frame rates suitable for 144 Hz monitors. The 86 FPS buffer over the 60 FPS threshold means even the heaviest combat scenarios are unlikely to drop below playable levels. For players with 240 Hz displays, dropping to High settings at 194 FPS or Medium at 223 FPS would be necessary to fully utilize the refresh rate, but the Ultra preset remains the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS.