Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 82 | 93 | 132 |
| 1440p QHD | 95 | 126 | 145 | 204 |
| 1080p Full HD | 129 | 172 | 197 | 278 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a remarkably consistent gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution and preset combination tested. The data shows a system that scales predictably with resolution, maintaining high frame rates even under maximum graphical loads. This combination exhibits a clear performance ceiling that remains well above average for the game's demands.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 278 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this combination. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 197 FPS, with a minimum of 168 FPS and a maximum of 227 FPS, indicating excellent frame pacing. The High preset yields 172 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset still manages a robust 129 FPS average. None of the 1080p results show any concern for fluidity, as even the most demanding preset maintains a frame rate more than double the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected scaling from the 1080p results. The Low preset averages 204 FPS, a 74 FPS reduction from the 1080p Low figure. Medium settings produce an average of 145 FPS, with a minimum of 123 FPS and a maximum of 166 FPS. The High preset delivers 126 FPS on average, while Ultra settings still achieve a comfortable 95 FPS. The frame time consistency appears solid, as the Medium preset's minimum of 123 FPS is still well above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to show the strain of rendering at 4K, though performance remains playable at every setting. The Low preset averages 132 FPS, which is a substantial 146 FPS drop from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce an average of 93 FPS, with a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 107 FPS. The High preset averages 82 FPS, while Ultra settings bring the system to its lowest tested point: an average of 61 FPS, which just clears the playability threshold. The 4K Ultra result represents the only configuration where the average dips below 80 FPS, but it still remains above the 60 FPS minimum for smooth gameplay.
The scaling pattern across resolutions is consistent: each step from 1080p to 1440p to 2160p reduces average frame rates by roughly 25-35% at the same preset. The gap between Low and Ultra presets widens at higher resolutions, with a 149 FPS difference at 1080p, 109 FPS at 1440p, and 71 FPS at 4K.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?*
A: Yes. The 3840x2160 Ultra preset produces an average of 61 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and it still achieves a playable frame rate.
Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combination achieves?
A: The highest recorded average is 278 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is more than four times the playability threshold of 60 FPS.
Q: How does the Medium preset perform in terms of frame consistency?
A: The Medium preset shows strong frame pacing across all resolutions. At 1080p, the minimum is 168 FPS with a maximum of 227 FPS; at 1440p, the minimum is 123 FPS with a maximum of 166 FPS; at 4K, the minimum is 79 FPS with a maximum of 107 FPS. The minimums stay well above the playability threshold in every case.
Q: Is there any resolution where the system fails to reach 60 FPS?
A: No. The verdict data shows that all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at every resolution tested, from 1920x1080 through 3840x2160.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 204 FPS while the Ultra preset averages 95 FPS. This represents a 109 FPS difference, with Ultra delivering approximately 47% of the Low preset's frame rate.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS in minimum frame rate scenarios?
A: The only data available for minimum frame rates comes from the Medium preset. At 1080p, the minimum is 168 FPS; at 1440p, it is 123 FPS; and at 4K, it is 79 FPS. All of these minimums are above 60 FPS, indicating that the system maintains playable performance even in dips.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a system that is primarily GPU-bound in Lockdown Protocol. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 provides sufficient headroom that the frame rate differences between resolutions follow the expected GPU workload pattern. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces average frame rates by approximately 25-30% across presets, and the transition from 1440p to 4K reduces them by another 35-40%. This consistent scaling indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor, as CPU performance would show less variation across resolution changes.
The Core Ultra 5 235's benchmark results support its role as a capable partner for the RTX 5070. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 14,769 points in multi-core and 2,085 in single-core tests, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. This places the processor in close competition with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (0.1% ahead), Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.1% behind), AMD EPYC 4364P (0.2% ahead), and AMD EPYC 7303 (0.2% ahead). The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 37,816 and single-thread score of 4,516 further indicate that it has ample compute resources for game logic and physics.
The GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the Low preset's 278 FPS average suggests that the CPU may be approaching its limit in feeding frames, but at 4K, the GPU workload dominates. The RTX 5070's PassMark G3D score of 29,137 and its 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate strong raw performance. The GPU also shows balanced compute capabilities with a PassMark GPU compute score of 15,787 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077.
The frame rate behavior across presets further confirms the GPU-bound nature. At each resolution, the difference between Low and Medium presets is substantial (81 FPS at 1080p, 59 FPS at 1440p, 39 FPS at 4K), while the difference between High and Ultra is smaller (43 FPS at 1080p, 31 FPS at 1440p, 21 FPS at 4K). This pattern suggests that the Ultra preset introduces diminishing returns in visual quality relative to its performance cost, but the GPU handles the additional load without causing frame rates to drop below playable levels.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with an average score of 46,030 (0.1% lower than the Ultra 5 235's 46,062), the Intel Core i9-13900HX with a score of 46,098 (0.1% higher), the AMD EPYC 4364P with a score of 45,970 (0.2% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7303 with a score of 45,960 (0.2% lower). These processors fall within a narrow performance band, meaning any of them would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Lockdown Protocol. The Core i9-13900HX is the closest match, with a delta of just 0.1% from the Ultra 5 235.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with an average score of 40,318 (0.1% lower than the RTX 5070's 40,377), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 with a score of 40,063 (0.8% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 with a score of 40,870 (1.2% higher), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile with a score of 39,568 (2.0% lower). The Radeon Pro 580 is the closest performance match, while the RTX A500 Mobile represents the largest gap among the listed rivals. For a user considering alternative hardware, these GPUs would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the RTX 5070 in Lockdown Protocol.
It is importantly the CPU's rivals include both mobile and server parts, indicating that the Ultra 5 235's performance profile is well-rounded. The GPU's rivals are predominantly professional workstation cards, which suggests that the RTX 5070's gaming performance is somewhat unique in its benchmark neighborhood.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which deliver an average of 129 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and it maintains a frame rate more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold. There is no reason to reduce settings at this resolution, as even the maximum graphical load leaves substantial performance headroom.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again provides the best experience, with an average of 95 FPS. This represents a 34 FPS reduction from the 1080p Ultra result, but it remains comfortably above the playability threshold. The High preset at 126 FPS is also viable, but Ultra offers higher visual quality while still maintaining smooth performance.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best playable setting at 4K, but it leaves minimal headroom for frame rate drops. For users who prioritize consistency over absolute visual quality, the High preset at 82 FPS offers a more comfortable margin. However, the data shows that Ultra achieves the required frame rate, so it is the recommended setting for maximum visual fidelity.
Across all resolutions, the Medium preset provides the only recorded minimum frame rate data, and those minimums are consistently above 79 FPS at 4K, 123 FPS at 1440p, and 168 FPS at 1080p. This suggests that even in demanding scenes, the system maintains playable performance.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol at every resolution and preset combination tested, with all configurations clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 129 FPS, providing an excellent experience. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver 95 FPS, which is also well above the threshold. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, which meets the minimum requirement but offers limited headroom.
The verdict data confirms that all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at all three resolutions. The most demanding configuration—4K Ultra—achieves an average of 61 FPS, making it the borderline case. For users who want to ensure consistent performance above the minimum threshold, the High preset at 4K provides a safer 82 FPS average. At 1440p and below, there is no meaningful risk of dropping below 60 FPS, as even the Ultra preset maintains 95 FPS or higher.
The system demonstrates that it can handle the game's maximum visual settings without requiring compromises, except at 4K where the Ultra preset leaves only a 1 FPS margin above the playability threshold. The overall verdict is that this combination is fully capable of running Lockdown Protocol at high frame rates across the board, with only the 4K Ultra configuration requiring close monitoring.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination ranks 727th out of 3,714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 19.6% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the system's ability to maintain high frame rates across all resolutions and presets, despite not being an absolute top-tier setup.
The ranking is supported by the individual component percentiles. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined ranking of 727 out of 3,714 suggests that the pairing works well together, with neither component significantly bottlenecking the other. The system's performance is consistent with its component scores, and the measured frame rates align with what the individual benchmark data would predict.
Given that the combination clears the playability threshold at every tested configuration, the 727th rank indicates that there are a substantial number of more powerful combos, but this pairing still delivers a strong experience. The large gap between the 1080p Low result (278 FPS) and the 4K Ultra result (61 FPS) shows that the system has a wide performance envelope, making it suitable for both competitive play at lower settings and visually rich experiences at higher settings.