Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 59 | 68 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 91 | 105 | 148 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 125 | 143 | 201 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
Lockdown Protocol is a fast-paced FPS that demands both strong CPU throughput and a GPU capable of sustaining high frame rates. This analysis examines the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, using measured benchmark data to determine exactly how this combination performs across common gaming resolutions and presets. The data shows a system that is highly capable at mainstream resolutions, with clear trade-offs emerging as the pixel count climbs to 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS results for this combination provide a comprehensive picture of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly powerful. On Low settings, the average frame rate hits 201 FPS, which is exceptionally high. Moving up to Medium settings, the average drops to 143 FPS, with a minimum of 121 FPS and a maximum of 164 FPS. High settings yield an average of 125 FPS, and even at the demanding Ultra preset, the average remains strong at 94 FPS. This indicates that at 1080p, the RTX 5060 and Core Ultra 5 235 have ample headroom, keeping frame rates far above the 60 FPS playable threshold even with maximum visual fidelity.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance remains robust but begins to show the expected load increase. Low settings produce an average of 148 FPS. Medium settings deliver an average of 105 FPS, with the frame time variance captured in a minimum of 89 FPS and a maximum of 120 FPS. High settings average 91 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most visually intensive, still manages an average of 69 FPS. This is a key figure, as it shows the combination can handle 1440p at the highest settings while staying above the 60 FPS playability target.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the performance curve steepens significantly. Low settings are still very playable, with an average of 95 FPS. Medium settings average 68 FPS, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS. This minimum frame rate dips below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating potential for brief stutters during intense scenes. High settings drop to an average of 59 FPS, which is just under the playable mark. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding an average of only 44 FPS, which is not suitable for smooth gameplay.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a classic shift in component roles as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the CPU's performance headroom allows the GPU to run at its full potential. The difference between Low and Ultra settings is a massive 107 FPS (from 201 down to 94), showing that the GPU is the sole limiter; the CPU is not holding it back. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235, with its strong single-threaded performance, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent even at high frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the balance begins to tip. The scaling between 1080p and 1440p shows a performance cost of roughly 25-30% across most presets. For instance, on High settings, the average drops from 125 FPS at 1080p to 91 FPS at 1440p. This indicates that while the GPU is still the primary workload carrier, the CPU is still feeding it enough data to maintain high utilization. The 1440p Ultra average of 69 FPS confirms that the system is still GPU-bound, but with less headroom.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's role is definitively dominant. The 4K results show a steep drop-off, particularly at High and Ultra presets. The gap between 1440p High (91 FPS) and 4K High (59 FPS) is a 35% reduction, and the 4K Ultra result of 44 FPS shows the RTX 5060's 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory bus are under significant stress. The CPU is no longer the limiting factor; the GPU simply cannot maintain high frame rates when processing the sheer pixel count of 4K alongside high-detail settings. The minimum FPS of 57 at 4K Medium further illustrates this point, as the GPU's rendering time is spiking.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users looking at comparable hardware, the benchmark database provides useful reference points. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, which has an average benchmark score of 46030, a mere 0.1% difference from the Core Ultra 5 235's score. This indicates they would deliver virtually identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core i9-13900HX is also a direct competitor, with an average score of 46098, showing a -0.1% delta. In practice, these processors would produce the same gameplay experience in Lockdown Protocol.
On the GPU side, the nearest rivals are quite interesting. The AMD Radeon 860M has an average score of 26401, which is -0.3% relative to the RTX 5060's score. This suggests that despite being an integrated solution, the Radeon 860M offers surprisingly similar raw compute performance in this benchmark. Similarly, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also -0.3% from the RTX 5060. These are older or lower-tier parts that would likely fall short in actual gaming due to memory bandwidth limitations, but the average scores place them in the same performance class. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a score of 26011, a +1.2% delta, meaning it is a slightly slower alternative that would deliver marginally lower frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations, this pairing ranks at 1649 out of 3714 combos. This places it in the 44th percentile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms a significant portion of the database but is not a top-tier enthusiast setup. This rank is a reflection of its strengths and limitations: it is a solidly mid-to-upper-range combination that excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra. The rank of 1649 suggests that many other combos, likely featuring higher-end GPUs, can achieve better 4K performance, while this system is optimized for the more common 1440p and 1080p gaming monitors.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The answer is a definitive yes, with specific caveats based on resolution. The verdict data shows that at 1920x1080, all four settings—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the best experience at Ultra averaging 94 FPS. This is the ideal resolution for this setup.
At 2560x1440, the system is also fully playable across all settings. The Ultra preset averages 69 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, making this a great option for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The best playable setting is Ultra, and the system handles it without dropping below the playable limit.
The situation changes at 3840x2160. The verdict indicates that only Low and Medium settings are playable, with Medium being the best option at an average of 68 FPS. However, the minimum FPS of 57 at Medium shows that it can occasionally dip below 60 FPS, which might be noticeable in fast-paced action. High and Ultra settings are not playable, with averages of 59 and 44 FPS respectively. Therefore, for a 4K display, users must stick to Medium settings or lower to ensure a smooth experience. The data confirms that this is a strong 1080p and 1440p gaming machine, but 4K gaming requires compromises.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combination?
A: Based on the data, 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 are the optimal resolutions. Both allow for Ultra settings with average frame rates above 60 FPS, with 1080p Ultra delivering 94 FPS and 1440p Ultra delivering 69 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?
A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, only Low (95 FPS) and Medium (68 FPS) settings are playable. The Medium preset's minimum frame rate of 57 FPS indicates occasional dips below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?
A: The benchmark scores are nearly identical. The Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, a delta of only 0.1%. In gaming, performance would be effectively indistinguishable.
Q: Is the RTX 5060 more similar to an integrated GPU or a discrete GPU in performance?
A: In average benchmark scores, the RTX 5060 is closely matched with the AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550, both showing a delta of -0.3%. However, the RTX 5060's dedicated GDDR7 memory and higher bandwidth make it far more capable in actual gaming workloads.
Q: What is the playable threshold for this game?
A: The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS. The verdict data uses this to determine which settings are considered playable at each resolution.
Q: Which component becomes the bottleneck at 4K resolution?
A: The data shows the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 3840x2160. The steep drop in average FPS from 1440p to 4K, particularly on High and Ultra settings, indicates the RTX 5060 cannot process the increased pixel count at high detail levels.