Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

93%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
201 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
94 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
69 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
95 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
44 FPS
8ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 36,938
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 44 59 68 95
1440p QHD 69 91 105 148
1080p Full HD 94 125 143 201

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 125
1920x1080 Low 201
1920x1080 Medium 143
1920x1080 Ultra 94
2560x1440 High 91
2560x1440 Low 148
2560x1440 Medium 105
2560x1440 Ultra 69
3840x2160 High 59
3840x2160 Low 95
3840x2160 Medium 68
3840x2160 Ultra 44

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a clear, tiered performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, with the data showing a strong 1080p experience, a fully playable 1440p experience, and a 4K experience that requires settling for lower presets. Measured results place the CPU at the 85th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile, making this a balanced pairing where the processor’s synthetic lead does not overshadow the graphics card’s role. Across all resolutions, the average frame rates move in predictable steps as settings climb, with the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K being the only configuration that drops below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces its highest frame rates across every preset. The Low preset averages 201 FPS, which is the single fastest result in the entire dataset. Medium averages 143 FPS, with a minimum of 121 FPS and a maximum of 164 FPS, showing a tight band that indicates consistent frame delivery. High averages 125 FPS, while Ultra averages 94 FPS. All four settings remain far above the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even the minimum recorded on Medium exceeds that threshold by a wide margin.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling is linear and predictable. Low averages 148 FPS, Medium averages 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and a maximum of 120 FPS, High averages 91 FPS, and Ultra averages 69 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 43 FPS, while the step from Medium to High costs another 14 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 22 FPS. The Ultra preset still clears 60 FPS, meaning every setting at this resolution is playable, though the margin at Ultra is narrow at just 9 FPS above the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the data reveals a sharper drop-off. Low averages 95 FPS, which is still comfortably playable. Medium averages 68 FPS, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS — the minimum dips below 60 FPS, signaling occasional stutter despite the average being above the threshold. High averages 59 FPS, which falls just under the playable line, and Ultra averages 44 FPS, a result that is clearly not suitable for smooth gameplay. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is only 9 FPS, but that small difference crosses the critical 60 FPS boundary. The jump from High to Ultra costs 15 FPS, the largest single-setting drop in the 4K dataset.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 94 FPS, which is 34 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets at this resolution — Low at 201 FPS, Medium at 143 FPS, High at 125 FPS, and Ultra at 94 FPS — clear the threshold by a substantial margin.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440, averaging 69 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, and it is also the highest visual quality option available at this resolution. Low averages 148 FPS, Medium averages 105 FPS, and High averages 91 FPS, so all options are viable.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: Partially. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 95 FPS and Medium averages 68 FPS, both clearing the 60 FPS threshold. However, High averages 59 FPS and Ultra averages 44 FPS, so the two higher presets are not playable. The Medium preset also shows a minimum of 57 FPS, indicating that frame dips below 60 FPS can occur even when the average is acceptable.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At the Low preset, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 201 FPS to 95 FPS, a reduction of 106 FPS. At the Medium preset, the drop is from 143 FPS to 68 FPS, a reduction of 75 FPS. At the High preset, the drop is from 125 FPS to 59 FPS, a reduction of 66 FPS. At the Ultra preset, the drop is from 94 FPS to 44 FPS, a reduction of 50 FPS. The absolute loss shrinks as the preset gets more demanding, but the relative loss becomes more severe.

Q: Which resolution offers the most headroom above the 60 FPS threshold?

A: 1920x1080 offers the most headroom. Even the Ultra preset at 94 FPS sits 34 FPS above the threshold, while the Low preset at 201 FPS sits 141 FPS above it. At 1440p, the Ultra preset sits just 9 FPS above the threshold, and at 4K, the Medium preset sits only 8 FPS above it.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance at any specific resolution?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K. At 1080p, the Low preset reaches 201 FPS, which is high enough that the CPU’s single-thread performance could become relevant, but the measured results show no bottleneck below 60 FPS at any resolution. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655 and multi-core score of 25891 indicate strong headroom for this game’s frame pacing.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 performs almost identically to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, which has an average benchmark score of 36945 against the Ultra 5’s 36938 — a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018, which is 0.2 percent higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093, which is 0.4 percent higher. The Intel Core i9-12900T trails slightly at 37112, a 0.5 percent difference. In practical terms, any of these four processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, with differences well under one percent.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060’s nearest rivals are a more mixed group. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, which is 0.3 percent lower than the RTX 5060’s 26331 average. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also 0.3 percent lower. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.8 percent lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, which is 1.2 percent higher. The tight delta range of -0.8 to +1.2 percent means that swapping to any of these cards would produce frame rate differences of only a few FPS in most scenarios, though the RX 6750 XT would edge ahead slightly.

For a user considering this combo, the practical alternative set would be pairing any of the four rival CPUs with any of the four rival GPUs. The most balanced swap would be the Ryzen 5 5600F with the Radeon RX 6750 XT, as both components sit at the top of their respective rival groups. The weakest combination would be the Core i9-12900T with the Radeon 860M, though the performance delta remains small enough that all combinations would stay within the same general FPS band.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the answer depends heavily on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset averaging 94 FPS. At 2560x1440, every preset also clears 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset averaging 69 FPS — a narrow but real margin. At 3840x2160, only the Low and Medium presets are playable, averaging 95 FPS and 68 FPS respectively. The High preset at 4K averages 59 FPS, just missing the threshold, and the Ultra preset averages 44 FPS, which is well below playable.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: this is a 1080p and 1440p machine for Lockdown Protocol, with 4K limited to lower quality settings. The best overall experience is at 1440p Ultra, which balances visual fidelity with a 69 FPS average. At 1080p, the Ultra preset offers the highest quality with the most headroom, averaging 94 FPS. For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, the 1080p Low preset at 201 FPS is the fastest option in the entire dataset.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear shift in component importance as resolution increases. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 107 FPS (201 to 94), which is a 53 percent reduction in frame rate. This large spread indicates that the GPU is doing most of the work, as the settings-driven load scales with the graphics card’s capabilities. The CPU’s role at 1080p is to feed the GPU fast enough; with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 and a single-core score of 3655, it has ample headroom for the 201 FPS ceiling observed at Low settings.

At 1440p, the spread between Low and Ultra narrows to 79 FPS (148 to 69), a 53 percent reduction that mirrors the 1080p pattern. The GPU remains the dominant factor, as the resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 26 to 27 percent across all presets. The CPU’s performance does not change with resolution, so the consistent percentage drop confirms that the GPU is scaling with pixel count.

At 4K, the spread between Low and Ultra is 51 FPS (95 to 44), a 54 percent reduction that is remarkably consistent with the lower resolutions. This consistency suggests the GPU is the bottleneck throughout the entire preset range, as the CPU would show a different scaling pattern if it were limiting. The 4K Medium preset’s minimum of 57 FPS, compared to the 78 FPS maximum, also points to GPU memory bandwidth pressure rather than CPU thread starvation.

The CPU’s synthetic benchmarks reinforce this interpretation. The Passmark single-thread score of 4412 and multi-thread score of 30459 are both strong, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 places the processor well above the needs of a game that relies on frame pacing. In short, the RTX 5060 is the limiting component at every resolution, with the CPU providing more than enough compute headroom to avoid becoming a factor.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, which averages 94 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while staying 34 FPS above the playable threshold. The Low preset at 201 FPS is faster, but Ultra is the most demanding preset that remains fully playable.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, averaging 69 FPS. This is only 9 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, but it is the most demanding preset available and does clear the line. High at 91 FPS would offer more headroom, but Ultra is the optimal choice for quality.

At 3840x2160, the best setting is Medium, averaging 68 FPS. The Low preset at 95 FPS is faster, but Medium offers better visuals while still averaging above 60 FPS. It is important to note that the Medium preset’s minimum of 57 FPS falls below the threshold, so users may experience occasional dips. The High preset at 59 FPS is not recommended, as it fails to clear the average threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1649th out of 3714 combos. This places it in the 55th percentile of all systems tested, meaning 55 percent of configurations perform worse and 45 percent perform better. The rank is driven by the GPU’s 72nd percentile performance, which is the weaker of the two components, while the CPU’s 85th percentile score provides a baseline that prevents the combo from falling further down the list.

The ranking suggests that this is a mid-to-upper-mid-tier configuration for Lockdown Protocol. It outperforms the majority of tested systems, but it is not in the top tier that would be required for max-settings 4K play. The 1649th rank reflects the GPU’s 4K limitations more than the CPU’s capabilities, as the processor’s 85th percentile standing would typically support higher frame rates if paired with a faster graphics card. For the target resolutions of 1080p and 1440p, the rank is more than sufficient, with all presets at those resolutions clearing the playable threshold.