Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 52 | 74 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 71 | 81 | 114 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 97 | 111 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S presents a clear picture for Lockdown Protocol: this is a combination that scales predictably with resolution and settings, but hits a hard wall at 4K. The data shows a mobile-focused platform—14 cores and 18 threads from the CPU, and an integrated-class GPU with 2048 shading units—that is more than capable of delivering high refresh rates at 1080p, yet struggles to maintain playability at the highest resolution tested. The benchmark results indicate a system that is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring significant compromises in visual quality.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data shows a clear hierarchy across the three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1080p, the system is never below the playable threshold, even at the highest quality settings. The average frame rate at 1080p Low is 156 FPS, which nearly doubles the 60 FPS playability threshold. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 111 FPS, with a minimum of 94 FPS and a maximum of 127 FPS, indicating a stable experience. High settings at 1080p yield an average of 97 FPS, while Ultra settings still produce a very playable average of 73 FPS. The data shows that at 1080p, the AMD Radeon 8050S has enough headroom to maintain high refresh rates, making the Ultra preset a viable option for a more visually demanding experience.
At 2560x1440, the performance envelope tightens but remains largely above the playability threshold. The Low preset delivers an average of 114 FPS, which is still a high frame rate for competitive play. Medium settings reduce the average to 81 FPS, with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS, showing that the system can hold a good frame rate despite the increased pixel count. High settings at 1440p produce an average of 71 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset, however, brings the average down to 53 FPS, which misses the playability threshold and indicates that this setting is not viable for a smooth experience at this resolution.
The 3840x2160 resolution marks a significant performance cliff. The Low preset at 4K yields an average of 74 FPS, which is the only setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings at 4K average 52 FPS, with a minimum of 45 FPS and a maximum of 60 FPS, showing that the system dips below the playability line. High settings at 4 average 46 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops further to 34 FPS. The data shows a steep scaling penalty from 1440p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at this high resolution. For example, the difference between High settings at 1440p and High settings at 4K is 25 FPS, a 35% reduction in average frame rate.
FAQ
Q: Can this combination run Lockdown Protocol at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset is 73 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the most demanding setting tested at this resolution and it remains playable.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: The High preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, with an average of 71 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 53 FPS, which is below the threshold.
Q: The data shows a Low setting at 4K is playable, but is it smooth?
A: The average FPS of 74 at 3840x2160 with Low settings is above the 60 FPS threshold, but the margin is thinner than at lower resolutions. The system is playable, but the visual quality is significantly reduced.
Q: How does the system perform at 1080p Medium compared to 1440p Medium?
A: At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 111, with a minimum of 94. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 81, with a minimum of 69. The difference in average FPS is 30, showcasing a significant performance cost for the higher resolution.
Q: Is there a settings preset that is not playable at 1080p?
A: No. All four settings presets at 1920x1080 produce an average FPS above 60. The lowest is the Ultra preset at 73 FPS, and the highest is Low at 156 FPS.
Q: What is the maximum FPS recorded in the data?
A: The highest maximum FPS listed is 127 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 with Medium settings. The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 45 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. The data shows that this system is best suited for high refresh rate 1080p gaming.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that the AMD Radeon 8050S is the dominant factor in determining performance at higher resolutions. The CPU, an Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with 14 cores and 18 threads, is a capable processor, but its performance does not scale with resolution. The data shows that the differences in FPS between settings presets are consistent across resolutions, but the overall level is heavily influenced by the resolution itself. For instance, the drop from 1080p High to 1440p High is 26 FPS, while the drop from 1440p High to 4K High is 25 FPS. This indicates a significant load on the GPU as the pixel count increases.
The CPU’s role is more pronounced at lower resolutions where the GPU can keep up. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 156, which is a frame rate that the GPU can produce without being the bottleneck. The CPU’s performance in multi-threaded tasks, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12804.5, suggests it is more than capable of feeding frames, but the FPS results are limited by the GPU’s rendering capabilities. At 4K, the CPU's workload does not increase as much as the GPU's, so the performance is heavily tied to the GPU's fill rate and shader power. The 11.47 TFLOPS of the GPU is the primary limit at that resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for both components, there are several combinations that could offer similar performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has an average benchmark score of 27507, which places it very close to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and the Intel Core i5-12600K. The Ryzen 7 5800 has an average score of 27535, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Ultra 5. The Core i5-12600K scores 27578, with a delta of -0.3%. These CPUs would likely provide a very similar CPU bottleneck in gaming scenarios.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon 8050S’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which has a score of 61896 and a delta of 0.3%, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, which has a score of 63775 and a delta of -2.6%. The Radeon Pro W6600M is nearly identical in performance, making it a close alternative. A system with a Ryzen 7 5800 and a Radeon Pro W6600M would likely behave very similarly to the tested configuration. The Radeon RX 7600M, with a delta of -2.6%, is a slightly slower option, but still in a similar performance class. These parts would be the ones to consider if you are looking for a comparable experience.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding that stays at or above 60 FPS. The measured average FPS is 73 with this setting. This is the highest quality preset that can be used for a smooth experience. The High preset offers a higher average FPS of 97 if you prefer more headroom, but Ultra is the best for graphical fidelity while maintaining playability.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding that achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The average FPS at this setting is 71. The Ultra preset falls short at 53 FPS, so the High is the recommended option for 1440p gaming. The Medium preset also works, with an average of 81 FPS, but the High settings provide a better visual experience without sacrificing playability.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is viable, with an average FPS of 74. The Medium preset at 4K averages 52 FPS, which is below the threshold. The High and Ultra presets are not playable at this resolution. To run the game at 4K, you must use the Low settings preset.
The Verdict
This PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience depends heavily on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, achieving above 60 FPS at all tested settings, including Ultra with an average of 73 FPS. The data shows that this is a very good 1080p system for this game. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable, but only up to the High preset, which averages 71 FPS. The Ultra preset is not playable because it falls to 53 FPS. The ver at this resolution is positive, but you are limited in the quality settings you can use.
At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on Low settings, with an average of 74 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdictByResolution data lists "Low" as the only playable setting at 4K. So, the combination can run the game at 4K, but you will have to accept a significant reduction in visual quality to do so. The system is a capable 1080p and 1440p machine, but not a 4K gaming setup.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and the AMD Radeon 8050S is ranked 2746 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This ranking places it in the lower third of all tested systems. While the absolute performance is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the combo is outclassed by many other pairings. The GPU’s percentile ranking is 89, which is high compared to all GPUs, but the CPU's percentile is 79. This suggests the GPU is a stronger part than the CPU, but the overall combo rank is still low due to the fact that many other systems have more powerful GPUs. The ranking is a reflection of the system's overall capability relative to the complete test pool, which includes high-end desktop parts. The data indicates that while this system can handle this game, it is not a high-performance combo in the broader context.