Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

85%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
168 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
78 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
57 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
79 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
9.6ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 49 56 79
1440p QHD 57 76 87 123
1080p Full HD 78 104 119 168

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 104
1920x1080 Low 168
1920x1080 Medium 119
1920x1080 Ultra 78
2560x1440 High 76
2560x1440 Low 123
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 57
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Lockdown Protocol, but it falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold at 4K on higher presets. The data shows a system that scales predictably with resolution, where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally strong, with even the Ultra preset averaging 78 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rate remains fluid, but the headroom shrinks considerably. At 3840x2160, the system manages 60 FPS only on the Low preset, making 4K a compromised experience for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Lockdown Protocol reveals distinct performance tiers across the three resolutions tested. At 3840x2160, the system produces an average of 37 FPS on the Ultra preset, which is the lowest recorded average across all configurations. Dropping to High settings at this resolution raises the average to 49 FPS, still well below the playable threshold. The Medium preset at 4K yields an average of 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, showing notable fluctuation. Only the Low preset at 3840x2160 achieves a playable average of 79 FPS, indicating a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium settings.

At 2560x1440, the picture improves dramatically. The Low preset delivers an average of 123 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. The High preset maintains a solid 76 FPS average, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p dips to 57 FPS, just under the playable mark, showing that the most demanding settings are marginally too heavy for this resolution. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a drop of 66 FPS, indicating a 54% reduction in average frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the system excels across the board. The Low preset hits an average of 168 FPS, the highest score recorded for any combination. The Medium preset averages 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 137 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during demanding scenes. The High preset averages 104 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 78 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold. The minimum FPS data for 1080p is only available for Medium settings, at 101 FPS, suggesting that even the most demanding presets likely stay close to the average without severe drops.

Looking at the maximum FPS values, the only data points provided are for Medium settings across all resolutions: 137 FPS at 1080p, 100 FPS at 1440p, and 65 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the Medium preset is the only one where the system records both minimum and maximum frames, offering a clear picture of stability. The gap between the average and minimum FPS at Medium is 18 FPS at 1080p, 13 FPS at 1440p, and 8 FPS at 4K, showing that higher resolutions produce less frame variance, likely due to GPU-bound limitations.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 2293rd out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the lower half of the database, which is surprising given the high-end CPU and mid-range GPU. The combo ranking suggests that the RTX 5050 is the limiting factor, holding the system back from a higher percentile standing. With a percentile score of 66 among all GPUs, the RTX 5050 is an average performer, while the CPU sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, showing that the processor is not the constraint.

The rank of 2293 out of 3714 combos corresponds to roughly the 62nd percentile of all tested pairings, meaning that 62% of other configurations perform better in this game. This is a notable gap, as the CPU alone would likely rank much higher if paired with a stronger GPU. The data suggests that the i9-14900K is overkill for this GPU in the context of Lockdown Protocol, as the GPU reaches its limits before the CPU can flex its full multi-core strength. For comparison, the i9-14900K’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, has an average score of 79371, which is only 0.3% lower than the i9-14900K’s 79097, so the CPU choice has minimal impact on the overall result.

The RTX 5050’s percentile rank of 66 means it outperforms 66% of all GPUs in the database, but this is not enough to place the combo in a higher position. The combo rank is a direct consequence of the GPU’s average score of 21035, which is close to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT’s 20713, a delta of 1.6%. This closeness in GPU scores explains why the system falls to the 2293rd rank, as the RTX 5050 is positioned among older mid-range cards, not modern high-end options.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which yields an average FPS of 79. This is the only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, as Medium drops to 56 FPS, High to 49 FPS, and Ultra to 37 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is only viable when sacrificing all visual fidelity, and even then, the average of 79 FPS is not particularly high, leaving little headroom for demanding scenes.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is High, with an average of 76 FPS. The Medium preset also works at 87 FPS, but the High settings offers better visuals while staying above the threshold. The Ultra preset cannot be used, as it averages 57 FPS, just below the playability cutoff. The Low preset at 1440p is available but not optimal, as it averages 123 FPS, which is wasted performance on such a powerful CPU.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is playable with an average of 78 FPS, making it the best choice for maximum graphical quality. The High preset averages 104 FPS, Medium averages 119 FPS, and Low averages 168 FPS, all well above the threshold. The data indicates that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combination, allowing for full visual settings without sacrificing smoothness. The recommendation is to use Ultra at 1080p, High at 1440p, and Low at 4K to maintain a playable frame rate.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i9-14900KF has an average score of 79371, which is 0.3% lower than the i9-14900K’s 79097. This means the i9-14900KF would behave nearly identically, with only a negligible difference in performance. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus has an average score of 79574, which is 0.6% higher than the i9-14900K, suggesting a tiny performance edge. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041, 1.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, 1.7% lower. For Lockdown Protocol, any of these CPUs would produce nearly the same frame rates, as the game is not CPU-bound at the tested resolutions.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show a different picture. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL has an average score of 21153, which is 0.6% lower than the RTX 5050’s 21035. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237, 1% lower, while the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, 1.6% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, which is 1.6% higher than the RTX 5050. This means the RX 5600 XT could be a close alternative, with slightly better performance in synthetic benchmarks. In practice, for Lockdown Protocol, these GPUs would deliver similar average FPS, with the RTX 5050 holding a slight edge or falling behind depending on the resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals that the GPU is the dominant factor in Lockdown Protocol’s performance, particularly at higher resolutions. Comparing the FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K, the average FPS at Low settings drops from 168 to 79, a reduction of 89 FPS, or a 53% decrease. This significant drop is typical of GPU-bound scenarios, where the CPU has enough headroom to process frames but the GPU cannot keep up with the pixel count. At 1080p with Ultra settings, the average is 78 FPS, which is only 1 FPS lower than the 4K Low average of 79 FPS, showing that the CPU is not the limiting factor.

At 1440p, the scaling is more moderate. The High preset averages 76 FPS, which is only 2 FPS higher than the 4K Low average of 79 FPS, but 39 FPS lower than the 1080p Ultra average of 78 FPS, which is a 1 FPS difference. This suggests that the GPU is the sole bottleneck when moving from 1440p to 4K, as the CPU performance remains constant. The CPU’s role is further evidenced by the fact that the i9-14900K’s average score of 79097 is in the 95th percentile, while the RTX 5050’s score is in the 66th percentile, indicating the GPU is the constraint.

The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is more relevant, as the GPU has less pixel work to do. The FPS difference between Low (168 FPS) and Ultra (78 FPS) at 1080p is 90 FPS, which is driven by the GPU’s shading and memory bandwidth. However, the CPU’s single-core strength, evidenced by its 2262.5 R23 score, ensures that the frame times are consistent, as shown by the Medium settings’ minimum of 101 FPS at 1080p. At 4K, the CPU is virtually irrelevant, as the GPU’s 8 GB memory and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot process the pixel load, resulting in sub-60 FPS averages for all presets except Low.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest settings preset that runs above 60 FPS at 3840x2160?

A: The Low preset is the only playable option at 4K, averaging 79 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 56, 49, and 37 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the i9-14900K compare to its closest CPU rival in terms of benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KF has an average score of 79371, which is 0.3% lower than the i9-14900K’s 79097. This difference is negligible, meaning both CPUs would perform identically in Lockdown Protocol.

Q: Is the RTX 5050 faster or slower than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average score of 21035, while the RX 5600 XT scores 20713. The RTX 5050 is 1.6% higher, indicating a slight edge in synthetic benchmarks, but the in-game FPS would be very close.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440 to maintain 60 FPS?

A: The High preset is the best playable option at 1440p, averaging 76 FPS. The Medium preset averages 87 FPS, but the Ultra preset only 57 FPS, so High is the most demanding settings that stays above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the combo rank in the overall benchmark database?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K and RTX 5050 combination ranks 2293rd out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the lower half of the database, despite the CPU’s high percentile.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more at 1920x1080?

A: At 1080p, the GPU is still the primary factor, as the average FPS drops from 168 on Low to 78 on Ultra, a 90 FPS difference. The CPU can easily keep up, as its high single-core performance ensures that the GPU is the bottleneck.