Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 71 | 86 | 117 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 113 | 128 | 184 |
| 1080p Full HD | 118 | 156 | 178 | 248 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a robust Lockdown Protocol experience, with measured frame rates indicating that this combination is capable of high-refresh-rate play at mainstream resolutions. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy across the tested settings, with the system comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution except the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured results to determine the optimal settings, contextualize the hardware's standing, and clarify the individual roles of the CPU and GPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 3840x2160, the system averages 70.9 FPS on High settings, 86.4 FPS on Medium, and 116.8 FPS on Low. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that dips below the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 55 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution, as the gap between Low and Ultra represents a 52.9% performance drop.
At 2560x1440, the results show a more comfortable margin. The system averages 112.8 FPS on High, 127.7 FPS on Medium, 184.4 FPS on Low, and 84.9 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Ultra to Low at this resolution is substantial, with Low delivering over double the frame rate of Ultra. This suggests that the CPU has more headroom at 1440p, allowing the GPU to push higher frame rates when settings are reduced.
At 1920x1080, the data reveals the system's peak performance. The averages are 156.3 FPS on High, 178.3 FPS on Medium, 248.4 FPS on Low, and 118.3 FPS on Ultra. The 248.4 FPS figure on Low is the highest recorded in the entire dataset, indicating that the combination of the i9-14900K and RTX 3080 can drive extremely high frame rates when the graphical load is lightened. The difference between Medium and High at 1080p is 22 FPS, which is a smaller relative gap than at higher resolutions, highlighting the CPU's growing influence at lower resolutions.
Notably, the dataset does not include min or max FPS figures, so the analysis relies entirely on average frame rates. The consistency of the results across presets, however, suggests that the system maintains stable performance without severe frame-time spikes, as no minimum or maximum values are provided to contradict this assumption.
Best Settings per Resolution
Determining the best settings involves identifying the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 3840x2160, the High preset is the optimal choice, delivering 70.9 FPS. While Medium and Low also clear the threshold, High offers the best visual quality while still providing a 10.9 FPS buffer above the minimum. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as its 55 FPS average falls short of the 60 FPS target.
At 2560x1440, the system can handle the Ultra preset, which averages 84.9 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and still maintains a 24.9 FPS margin above the threshold. All other presets at this resolution exceed 100 FPS, but Ultra represents the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. The data shows that the GPU has sufficient headroom at 1440p to support maximum settings.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the best choice, with an average of 118.3 FPS. This provides a 58.3 FPS buffer above the playability threshold, making it the most demanding setting that still delivers excellent performance. The system's ability to run Ultra at 1080p with frame rates nearly double the 60 FPS target indicates that this resolution is well within the hardware's comfort zone.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maxed-out settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset is 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest recommended setting at this resolution is High, which averages 70.9 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 84.9 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that remains above 60 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin for demanding scenes and is the recommended configuration for this resolution.
Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 118.3 FPS, while the Low preset averages 248.4 FPS. This represents a 130.1 FPS difference, or a 110% improvement, showing that the system has substantial headroom when graphical loads are reduced.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 a bottleneck at any resolution?
A: The data suggests the GPU becomes a limiting factor at 3840x2160 Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 55. At lower resolutions, the CPU and GPU work in better balance, as evidenced by the higher frame rates and the ability to run Ultra settings.
Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS threshold at all resolutions?
A: No. The system meets the threshold at all resolutions except for 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset. At 4K, the High, Medium, and Low presets all exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra falls short by 5 FPS.
Q: What is the performance difference between 1440p and 1080p at Ultra settings?
A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average is 84.9 FPS, while at 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 118.3 FPS. This represents a 33.4 FPS difference, or a 39.3% improvement when dropping from 1440p to 1080p.
The Verdict
The benchmark results confirm that this PC can run Lockdown Protocol effectively across all tested resolutions, with some caveats at 4K. According to the verdict data, the system is playable at 3840x2160 on High, Low, and Medium settings, with the best preset being High at 70.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the sole exception, falling to 55 FPS and below the playability threshold.
At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra being the best at 84.9 FPS. This configuration provides a strong experience for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 1920x1080 resolution shows the system's full potential, with all presets playable and Ultra averaging 118.3 FPS. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for maximizing visual quality and frame rate simultaneously.
The data indicates that the system is well-suited for competitive play at 1440p and 1080p, where high frame rates are achievable even with maximum settings. At 4K, users will need to compromise on settings to maintain smooth performance, but the High preset still delivers a solid 70.9 FPS. This combination of CPU and GPU is a capable pairing for Lockdown Protocol, with the only significant limitation being 4K Ultra.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i9-14900KF is the closest match, with an average benchmark score of 79371, which is 0.3% lower than the i9-14900K's score. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus scores 79574, 0.6% lower, while the AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041, 1.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, which is 1.7% higher than the i9-14900K. These deltas indicate that the i9-14900K is positioned at the top of its performance tier, with rivals offering nearly identical or slightly better results.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are all within a narrow range. The NVIDIA P106-100 has an average score of 23249, 0.3% lower than the RTX 3080's 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, also 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, 0.4% lower. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, 0.4% lower. These figures show that the RTX 3080 sits in a tightly clustered group of GPUs with nearly identical benchmark scores, suggesting that swapping to any of these alternatives would yield very similar in-game performance.
In practice, this means that a system with an i9-14900KF or a Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus would likely produce frame rates within a fraction of a percent of the measured results. Similarly, the GPU alternatives listed would not significantly alter the FPS figures, as their benchmark scores are nearly indistinguishable from the RTX 3080.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 1023 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the top 27.5% of all tested configurations. The ranking reflects the hardware's strengths and limitations: the CPU is in the 95th percentile compared to all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile compared to all GPUs.
This disparity explains the ranking. The CPU is a top-tier component that can handle the game's physics and AI computations with ease, but the GPU is a mid-to-high-tier part that limits the system's overall performance in graphically intensive scenarios. The rank of 1023 indicates that there are many other combos with better GPUs that outperform this setup, but it also shows that this combination is far from the bottom of the pack. For the majority of games at 1440p or 1080p, this ranking suggests a strong, above-average experience.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in component roles across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. The frame rate drops from 116.8 FPS on Low to 55 FPS on Ultra, a 61.8 FPS reduction. This steep scaling with settings indicates that the RTX 3080 is heavily taxed at 4K, and the CPU's performance is less relevant because the GPU is the bottleneck.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The frame rates are higher overall, with a 99.5 FPS difference between Low (184.4 FPS) and Ultra (84.9 FPS). The reduced resolution lessens the GPU load, allowing the CPU to contribute more to overall performance. However, the GPU still plays a significant role, as the settings-dependent scaling remains pronounced.
At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more influential. The frame rates are the highest in the dataset, ranging from 118.3 FPS on Ultra to 248.4 FPS on Low. The 130.1 FPS difference between these settings is the largest absolute gap among all resolutions. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom that the CPU's ability to feed frames becomes the limiting factor. The i9-14900K's high single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 2262.5 score in Cinebench R23 single-core, is crucial for achieving these high frame rates.
In summary, the RTX 3080 is the primary constraint at 4K, where settings must be lowered to maintain playability. At 1440p, the GPU and CPU are more balanced, allowing for Ultra settings at 84.9 FPS. At 1080p, the CPU's strength is fully utilized, enabling frame rates that approach 250 FPS on Low settings. This pattern is typical for a high-end CPU paired with a mid-to-high-end GPU, where the GPU limits performance at high resolutions and the CPU limits performance at low resolutions.