Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 47 | 54 | 76 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 73 | 83 | 117 |
| 1080p Full HD | 74 | 99 | 113 | 160 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 presents a significant CPU-GPU performance imbalance in Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS released on 2024-03-11. The benchmark data, measured directly from the game, shows that the RX 7600 becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, while the i9-14900K’s high processing power keeps frame rates competitive at lower resolutions. This analysis details the optimal settings, component roles, and overall viability of this combination.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of 60 FPS or higher is Ultra, which delivers an average of 74 FPS. This is a clear pass, as the combination has enough headroom to run the game at maximum visual quality. The data shows a steady progression from Low at 160 FPS to Medium at 113 FPS and High at 99 FPS, indicating that the GPU has ample performance to spare at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the ceiling for playable settings drops to High, which produces an average of 73 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold with an average of 54 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The scaling here is notable: Low runs at 117 FPS, Medium at 83 FPS, and High at 73 FPS, showing a relatively steep performance cost for each step up in quality. Users seeking maximum fidelity will need to stay at High to remain above the 60 FPS line.
At 3840x2160, the options narrow considerably. The only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold is Low, which averages 76 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS, and High falls to 47 FPS, while Ultra bottoms out at 35 FPS. This resolution presents a significant challenge for the RX 7600, as its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth struggles to feed the pixel throughput required at 4K. The verdict is clear: 4K gaming with this combo requires substantial graphical compromises.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results clearly delineate the shifting roles of the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s influence is most apparent, as the i9-14900K’s 24 cores and 32 threads help push frame rates to 160 FPS on Low settings. The scaling from Low to Ultra (a drop of 86 FPS) is steep, but even the most demanding preset stays well above 60 FPS, suggesting the GPU is not yet the sole bottleneck. The high single-thread and multi-thread performance of the i9-14900K, reflected in its 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, ensures that the game engine is never starved for processing power.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert its dominance. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 63 FPS (from 117 to 54), indicating that the RX 7600’s rendering workload is becoming the primary constraint. The CPU still provides a solid foundation, but the GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate are now the deciding factors for whether the game stays playable. At this resolution, the i9-14900K is effectively idling relative to the GPU’s workload.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unambiguously the limiting component. The performance collapse is dramatic: High settings yield 47 FPS, which is barely half of the 1080p High result of 99 FPS. The RX 7600’s 64 ROPs and 8 GB frame buffer are insufficient for the pixel count, causing the average FPS to plummet. The CPU’s role becomes nearly irrelevant here, as even a weaker processor would likely produce similar results. The data shows that the RX 7600’s 57th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the primary barrier to higher performance at this resolution.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?
A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 delivers an average of 74 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The benchmark data confirms that all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?
A: The High preset is the best option, providing an average of 73 FPS. While Medium runs at 83 FPS and Low at 117 FPS, High offers the best visual quality while staying above the 60 FPS line. The Ultra preset falls to 54 FPS, making it unplayable.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this combination?
A: Only at the Low preset, which averages 76 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 54 FPS, and High falls to 47 FPS, while Ultra is limited to 35 FPS. Users targeting 4K must accept significant reductions in visual fidelity.
Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, a delta of -0.2%, while the AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, a delta of -0.7%. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti are slightly slower, with scores of 15082 and 15063 respectively.
Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking among tested systems?
A: This combination ranks 2577th out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower half of all systems tested, reflecting the GPU’s mid-range positioning relative to the high-end CPU.
Q: Does the i9-14900K’s performance help at higher resolutions?
A: No. The data shows that at 3840x2160, the GPU is the sole bottleneck. The CPU’s performance, while excellent (95th percentile), cannot compensate for the RX 7600’s limitations at 4K, where even High settings only reach 47 FPS.
The Verdict
This PC can unequivocally run Lockdown Protocol, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable of running the game at Ultra settings with an average of 74 FPS, making it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate monitors. The data shows that all presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with even the most demanding settings leaving a comfortable margin.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable, but users must cap their expectations at High settings, which deliver 73 FPS. The Ultra preset’s 54 FPS average is a clear miss, so those seeking maximum quality at 1440p will need to accept a compromise or lower the resolution. The Medium preset at 83 FPS and Low at 117 FPS offer viable alternatives for smoother gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Only the Low preset achieves a playable 76 FPS, with all other settings falling below the 60 FPS line. The Medium preset’s minimum of 46 FPS indicates stuttering and inconsistency, making 4K gaming a poor experience with this hardware. The verdict is that this combo is a 1080p performer, a capable 1440p option with settings compromises, and a poor choice for 4K gaming.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested systems in Lockdown Protocol, this configuration ranks 2577th out of 3714 combos. This places it in the 31st percentile of all systems, indicating that while it is far from the slowest, it is also not a top-tier performer. The ranking reflects the significant imbalance between the i9-14900K, which sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and the RX 7600, which is in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The data suggests that this pairing is constrained by the GPU’s mid-range capabilities, preventing the CPU’s full potential from being realized in this title. For context, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 79097 far exceeds the GPU’s 15171, underscoring the mismatch.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the Intel Core i9-14900K, the nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 79371 (a delta of -0.3%), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, which scores 79574 (a delta of -0.6%). These processors would behave nearly identically in Lockdown Protocol, as the performance difference is negligible. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041 (a delta of -1.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740 (a delta of 1.7%), both of which are also within a 2% margin of the i9-14900K. Users upgrading from any of these CPUs would see no meaningful change in frame rates, as the GPU remains the limiting factor at most resolutions.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 has nearest rivals that are remarkably close in performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199 (-0.2%), while the AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270 (-0.7%). The AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti are slightly slower, with scores of 15082 and 15063 respectively. In practical terms, swapping the RX 7600 for any of these alternatives would yield nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, with differences unlikely to exceed 1-2 FPS in any given scene. The data indicates that this performance tier is tightly clustered, meaning there is little differentiation among these mid-range options.