Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
146 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
68 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
107 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
32 FPS
11.1ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 19,036

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 43 49 69
1440p QHD 50 66 76 107
1080p Full HD 68 90 103 146

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 90
1920x1080 Low 146
1920x1080 Medium 103
1920x1080 Ultra 68
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Low 107
2560x1440 Medium 76
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 43
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 49
3840x2160 Ultra 32

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 presents a stark contrast in capability: a top-tier CPU with a 95th percentile ranking against all processors, paired with a mid-range GPU sitting at the 63rd percentile. For Lockdown Protocol, an FPS title, this combination yields a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles at 4K. The data indicates the RX 6600 is the definitive bottleneck, as the i9-14900K’s immense processing power is largely held back by the GPU’s 8 GB frame buffer and RDNA 2 architecture at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this PC to play Lockdown Protocol?

A: According to the measured FPS data, the best experience is at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which delivers an average of 68 FPS. At 2560x1440, the highest playable preset is High, averaging 66 FPS.

Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 69 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 49 FPS, while High and Ultra average 43 and 32 FPS, respectively.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, scores 79371, which is 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, which is 1.7% lower.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark performance compare to its nearest competitors?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 has an average benchmark score of 19036. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 has a nearly identical score of 19030, representing a 0% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19049, which is 0.1% higher.

Q: What is the system’s overall performance ranking for this specific game?

A: The combination of the Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 ranks 2901 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol.

Q: Is there a significant performance drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: Yes, the data shows a clear drop. At Medium settings, the average FPS falls from 103 at 1920x1080 to 76 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 27 FPS. At High settings, it drops from 90 to 66 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

Benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rate in Lockdown Protocol, with the CPU's role being largely secondary at the tested settings. The scaling of scores across resolutions confirms this, as performance degrades significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario.

At 1920x1080, the system shows considerable headroom. The average FPS at Low settings is 146, which drops to 90 at High and 68 at Ultra. This 78 FPS spread between Low and Ultra demonstrates that the RX 6600 is the limiting factor, as the i9-14900K is more than capable of feeding frames at these rates. The CPU’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by its 2262.5 score in Cinebench R23 single-core, is unlikely to be a bottleneck here.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's load increases further. The average FPS at Low settings is 107, falling to 66 at High and 50 at Ultra. The performance gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 57 FPS, indicating that even the lowest settings are now demanding more from the GPU. The CPU continues to provide ample performance, but the RX 6600's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth start to limit the frame output.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The average FPS drops to 69 at Low and plummets to 32 at Ultra. The 37 FPS difference between these presets shows that the GPU cannot handle the pixel throughput required at 4K, regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The i9-14900K's performance is effectively neutralized at this resolution, as the RX 6600’s 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient to maintain high frame rates.

The data suggests that for this specific pairing, the CPU is not a constraining factor in any scenario. The primary role of the i9-14900K is to ensure consistent frame pacing and avoid CPU-side stutters, which its robust multi-core performance (39399.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) and 95th percentile ranking support. However, the gaming experience is entirely dictated by the GPU's ability to render frames, making the RX 6600 the component that determines playability.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data for the GPU, several other graphics cards would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol. The AMD Radeon RX 6600’s average benchmark score of 19036 is essentially matched by the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, which scores 19030 with a 0% deltaPct. This means a system with a Quadro K6000 would be expected to perform almost exactly the same as the RX 6600 in this game, assuming the CPU is not a limiting factor.

Similarly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, with an average score of 19049 (a 0.1% deltaPct), would be a very close performance equivalent. While it is a mobile part, its benchmark score suggests similar rasterization capabilities for this workload. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation is also close, with a score of 18954 and a 0.4% deltaPct, placing it within a hair's breadth of the RX 6600.

On the CPU side, the nearest rival to the Intel Core i9-14900K is the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which has an average benchmark score of 79371, just 0.3% higher. In a gaming scenario like Lockdown Protocol, the performance difference between these two would be negligible, as both are far beyond the requirements of the RX 6600. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041 (1.2% higher), but as a server-class chip, its gaming performance characteristics would be different despite the similar average score. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740 (1.7% lower), which would also not create a noticeable difference in this specific GPU-bound context.

For a user considering alternatives, swapping the RX 6600 for any of these GPUs with similar average scores would yield a nearly identical experience, with frame rate differences expected to be within a margin of error. Conversely, changing the CPU to one of its listed rivals would have no measurable impact on Lockdown Protocol’s performance, as the GPU would remain the bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 combination ranks 2901 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the lower 22nd percentile of all tested configurations, indicating that while it can play the game, it is not a high-performance pairing for this title.

This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations. The CPU is a top-tier part, ranking in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, but the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking drags the overall combo down. The data suggests that the i9-14900K is overqualified for this pairing, as its capabilities are not fully utilized by the RX 6600. A system with a more balanced GPU would likely rank significantly higher, as the CPU would not be the limiting factor.

The rank of 2901 indicates that a majority of tested systems (over 800) outperform this combination. This is not surprising given that the RX 6600 is an entry-level to mid-range GPU from 2021, while the CPU is a flagship from 2023. The combination is inherently unbalanced, and the benchmark results reflect this, with the GPU consistently being the performance ceiling.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Lockdown Protocol, but the playable experience is heavily dependent on the resolution. Based on the verdictByResolution data and the 60 FPS playable threshold, the system is fully capable of running the game at 1920x1080 with all presets, including Ultra which averages 68 FPS. At this resolution, the game is highly playable with no compromises needed.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with limitations. The High preset averages 66 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, but Ultra drops to 50 FPS, which is below the playable mark. Users at this resolution must choose between High settings for a smooth experience or lower settings for higher frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on the Low preset, which averages 69 FPS. The Medium preset averages 49 FPS, and High and Ultra are not viable at 43 and 32 FPS, respectively. This resolution pushes the RX 6600 to its limits, and the experience is only acceptable with significant visual compromises.

In summary, the verdict is positive for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the system offering a smooth experience at High settings or better. For 4K, the system is not recommended for a quality experience, as only the lowest settings provide playable frame rates. The primary limiting factor is the GPU, not the CPU.

Best Settings per Resolution

The following are the most demanding presets that maintain an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold, based on the measured FPS data.

  • 3840x2160: The best playable setting is Low, which achieves an average of 69 FPS. This is the only preset at this resolution that clears the 60 FPS threshold.
  • 2560x1440: The best playable setting is High, which achieves an average of 66 FPS. This provides a significant visual upgrade over Low while still maintaining playability.
  • 1920x1080: The best playable setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 68 FPS. This allows for the maximum visual fidelity at the most common gaming resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average, minimum, and maximum frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings preset.

3840x2160

  • Low: Average 69 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
  • Medium: Average 49 FPS. Minimum 42 FPS, Maximum 56 FPS.
  • High: Average 43 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
  • Ultra: Average 32 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.

2560x1440

  • Low: Average 107 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
  • Medium: Average 76 FPS. Minimum 64 FPS, Maximum 87 FPS.
  • High: Average 66 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
  • Ultra: Average 50 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.

1920x1080

  • Low: Average 146 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
  • Medium: Average 103 FPS. Minimum 88 FPS, Maximum 119 FPS.
  • High: Average 90 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.
  • Ultra: Average 68 FPS. Minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the RX 6600 delivers its best performance at 1080p, with a substantial drop in frame rates as resolution increases. The lack of minimum and maximum FPS data for several presets limits the analysis of frame time consistency, but the average FPS values provide a clear picture of overall performance. The Medium preset at each resolution shows the most detailed data, with the minimum FPS at 2560x1440 (64 FPS) and 1920x1080 (88 FPS) still staying above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating acceptable frame pacing. However, at 4K, the minimum FPS of 42 at Medium settings falls well below the playable threshold, suggesting potential stuttering.