Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

72%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
260 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
121 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
191 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
89 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
57 FPS
6.2ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 13,543

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 76 87 123
1440p QHD 89 118 135 191
1080p Full HD 121 161 185 260

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 161
1920x1080 Low 260
1920x1080 Medium 185
1920x1080 Ultra 121
2560x1440 High 118
2560x1440 Low 191
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 Ultra 89
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Low 123
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 Ultra 57

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT delivers a robust gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, with measured frame rates that comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across most configurations. Benchmark data confirms that this combination ranks 874th out of 3714 tested hardware combos for this title, placing it comfortably in the upper quartile of systems. At 1080p, the system pushes well past 120 FPS even at the highest preset, while 1440p remains highly fluid, and even 4K offers playable performance at three of the four quality settings. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, optimal settings per resolution, and the performance characteristics of this specific CPU and GPU pairing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data for this combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance scaling. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates range from 57 FPS at Ultra to 123 FPS at Low. The Medium preset at 4K delivers an average of 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS, showing consistent frame pacing even under load. High settings at 4K produce an average of 76 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 57 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data shows a clear progression: lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 4K yields a substantial 116% improvement in average frame rate, from 57 to 123 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance envelope expands significantly. The Low preset achieves an average of 191 FPS, while Medium delivers 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. High settings reach 118 FPS average, and Ultra maintains a strong 89 FPS average. The gap between Ultra and Low at 1440p is 102 FPS, representing a 115% increase when dropping from the highest to the lowest preset. All four presets at this resolution stay well above the 60 FPS threshold, with even the most demanding setting providing a comfortable margin.

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance. The Low preset achieves an exceptional 260 FPS average, while Medium reaches 185 FPS with a minimum of 157 FPS and a maximum of 212 FPS. High settings produce 161 FPS, and Ultra maintains 121 FPS. The scaling from Ultra to Low at 1080p shows a 139 FPS difference, a 115% improvement, mirroring the percentage gains seen at higher resolutions. The minimum frame rates recorded at Medium settings across all resolutions — 74 FPS at 4K, 115 FPS at 1440p, and 157 FPS at 1080p — indicate that the system maintains smooth performance even during demanding scenes, with no dramatic dips below the average.

Best Settings per Resolution

Identifying the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution, the data reveals that this system can handle high quality settings even at 4K. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, which delivers an average of 76 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls short at 57 FPS, making High the optimal choice for maximum visual fidelity while maintaining fluid gameplay. The Medium preset also remains playable at 87 FPS, but High offers superior graphics with only an 11 FPS average penalty.

At 2560x1440, the system unlocks the full range of settings. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 89 FPS, making it the best setting that stays above 60 FPS. This represents the most demanding configuration available at this resolution, and the system handles it with ample headroom. The jump from High to Ultra at 1440p costs 29 FPS on average, but the resulting 89 FPS still provides a smooth experience for fast-paced FPS gameplay.

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, delivering 121 FPS average. This is the highest quality setting available, and the system not only clears the 60 FPS threshold but does so with more than double the required frame rate. The scaling from 1440p Ultra to 1080p Ultra shows a 32 FPS improvement, demonstrating that the system has significant performance reserves at lower resolutions. Across all three resolutions, the data indicates that players seeking the best visual quality can select Ultra at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K users should step down to High for playable performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

Analyzing the performance scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to Lockdown Protocol's performance on this system. The GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises, evidenced by the frame rate progression across the three tested resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 260 FPS, dropping to 191 FPS at 1440p Low and 123 FPS at 4K Low. This scaling pattern — a 27% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 53% reduction from 1080p to 4K at the same settings — is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads, where pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor.

The CPU's influence is most apparent at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra presets is 139 FPS (260 vs 121), while at 1440p the same preset change yields a 102 FPS difference (191 vs 89), and at 4K it narrows to 66 FPS (123 vs 57). This decreasing spread at higher resolutions indicates that the CPU has more headroom to feed the GPU at lower pixel counts, while at 4K the GPU's rendering workload dominates. The Intel Core i7-14700KF, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, provides ample processing power to avoid bottlenecking the GPU even at 1080p Ultra where 121 FPS is sustained.

The transition from Medium to High settings at each resolution shows consistent GPU scaling: 11 FPS at 4K (87 to 76), 17 FPS at 1440p (135 to 118), and 24 FPS at 1080p (185 to 161). These relatively modest penalties suggest that the visual improvements from Medium to High are efficiently rendered. Conversely, the jump from High to Ultra imposes larger costs: 19 FPS at 4K, 29 FPS at 1440p, and 40 FPS at 1080p. This pattern indicates that the Ultra preset introduces significantly more GPU workload, and the system's performance at 4K Ultra (57 FPS) confirms that the GPU reaches its limit at this configuration. Overall, the data shows that the RX 9070 XT is the primary performance driver at 4K, while the i7-14700KF ensures consistent high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for both the CPU and GPU provides context for how other hardware might perform similarly in Lockdown Protocol. For the Intel Core i7-14700KF, the closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which has an average benchmark score of 69996 compared to the Intel chip's 70163 — a negligible 0.2% difference. This indicates that systems built with the Ryzen 7 9700F would deliver nearly identical frame rates in CPU-influenced scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX follows at 69875, just 0.4% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.9% with a score of 69515. On the other side, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads the i7-14700KF by 1%, with a score of 70879. All four rivals fall within a 2% performance band, suggesting that any of these CPUs would produce indistinguishable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol at the resolutions tested.

For the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, the nearest rivals are surprisingly older or lower-tier cards based on average benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon HD 7770M matches at 13536 versus the RX 9070 XT's 13543, a 0.1% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 scores 13515 (0.2% behind), and the NVIDIA P106-090 follows at 13470 (0.5% behind). The AMD Radeon Pro 555 is 1% behind with a score of 13407. However, these comparisons are based on aggregate benchmark averages rather than gaming-specific performance, and the measured FPS data for the RX 9070 XT in Lockdown Protocol demonstrates far stronger real-world gaming capability than these rival scores might suggest. The GPU's percentile ranking of 55 against all GPUs places it in the mid-range of the database, yet its measured performance in this title shows it handling 1440p Ultra at 89 FPS and 1080p Ultra at 121 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, at 4K the system achieves playable frame rates on High (76 FPS), Medium (87 FPS), and Low (123 FPS) presets. The Ultra preset falls short at 57 FPS, below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best quality setting at 1440p that maintains 60 FPS?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 89 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that stays above 60 FPS. All four presets at this resolution clear the threshold.

Q: How much performance difference exists between Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 260 FPS while Ultra averages 121 FPS, a difference of 139 FPS. This represents a 115% improvement when dropping from Ultra to Low.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the system sustains up to 260 FPS on Low settings, indicating the CPU provides sufficient processing power. The GPU becomes more dominant at higher resolutions, with the frame rate spread between presets narrowing as resolution increases.

Q: What are the minimum frame rates recorded for this system?

A: Minimum frame rates were recorded at Medium settings: 74 FPS at 3840x2160, 115 FPS at 2560x1440, and 157 FPS at 1920x1080. These represent the lowest measured values in the dataset.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at any resolution?

A: Yes, the Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440 with 89 FPS and at 1920x1080 with 121 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra drops to 57 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

The Verdict

The data confirms that this system can run Lockdown Protocol with strong performance across all mainstream resolutions. At 1920x1080, the verdict is unequivocal: the Ultra preset delivers 121 FPS, providing a high-refresh-rate experience that clears the 60 FPS threshold by more than double. The 1440p experience is equally impressive, with the Ultra preset maintaining 89 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in intense firefights. At 4K, the system remains playable but requires a settings adjustment: High preset runs at 76 FPS, while Medium offers 87 FPS and Low reaches 123 FPS; the Ultra preset at 57 FPS is the only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS standard. The measured data shows this CPU-GPU combination ranks 874th out of 3714 tested setups for this game, placing it comfortably above the median. For players targeting 1080p or 1440p, this system delivers maximum visual fidelity with excellent frame rates, while 4K users can achieve smooth performance by selecting High settings or lower. The Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT prove to be a capable pairing for Lockdown Protocol, with the GPU handling the rendering load at higher resolutions and the CPU providing ample headroom for high frame rates at lower settings.