Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
60 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
83 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
9.2ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 51 59 83
1440p QHD 60 80 91 128
1080p Full HD 81 109 124 175

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Low 175
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 80
2560x1440 Low 128
2560x1440 Medium 91
2560x1440 Ultra 60
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 83
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a split verdict in Lockdown Protocol, depending entirely on your target resolution. At 1080p and 1440p, this combination is a confident performer, clearing the 60 FPS threshold at every preset. At 4K, however, the system struggles with anything above Low settings, making it a less versatile option for high-resolution displays. The data, drawn from measured FPS across three resolutions and four quality presets, shows a clear pattern: the RX 9060’s 8 GB frame buffer and mid-range compute capabilities become the limiting factor as pixel count rises, despite the i7-14700K’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p): This is the combo’s most comfortable territory. At Low settings, the average frame rate hits 175 FPS, providing a massive headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. Moving to Medium reduces the average to 124 FPS, with a minimum of 106 FPS and a maximum of 143 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in chaotic scenes. High settings still deliver a robust 109 FPS average. Ultra settings, while the most demanding, remain fully playable with an 81 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 94 FPS drop, but the absolute numbers never threaten the 60 FPS playability threshold.

2560x1440 (1440p): Performance remains strong, though the impact of increased resolution is evident. Low settings yield a 128 FPS average, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings produce a 91 FPS average, with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS, offering a good balance between visual fidelity and fluidity. High settings drop to an 80 FPS average. Ultra settings are the only point of concern, landing exactly at 60 FPS average. This is technically playable by the 60 FPS threshold, but it leaves no headroom for drops during intense firefights, suggesting players might prefer High for consistency.

3840x2160 (4K): The picture changes dramatically at 4K. Low settings are the only fully playable option, with an 83 FPS average that still feels responsive. Medium settings fall to a 59 FPS average, with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 68 FPS, meaning the experience will stutter below the target. High settings drop further to 51 FPS, and Ultra is essentially unplayable at 39 FPS. The data shows a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium, indicating that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are exhausted quickly as texture and shading complexity increase.

The measured data includes min/max values only for Medium settings at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the 106 FPS minimum ensures no perceptible hitches. At 1440p Medium, the 77 FPS minimum is still comfortable. At 4K Medium, the 50 FPS minimum confirms the sub-60 experience. The absence of min/max data for other presets suggests the testing focused on the medium preset for frame-time consistency analysis.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The data shows an 83 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Low settings. Medium settings fall to 59 FPS, and High/Ultra are below 51 FPS, making them unsuitable for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: Ultra settings are technically playable with a 60 FPS average, but the safest choice is High, which provides an 80 FPS average. This offers better headroom for demanding scenes without sacrificing much visual quality.

Q: How does the i7-14700K’s CPU performance influence the 1080p results?

A: The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2160 in Cinebench R23 and 4472 in Passmark single-thread suggests it handles game logic and draw calls efficiently. This is reflected in the 175 FPS average at 1080p Low, where the GPU is not the bottleneck.

Q: Is the RX 9060’s 8 GB VRAM a problem for Lockdown Protocol?

A: The benchmark results indicate that at 4K, the GPU hits a performance wall between Low and Medium settings, with a 24 FPS drop. While not explicitly measuring VRAM usage, the steep degradation suggests memory capacity or bandwidth constraints at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the combo’s ranking among tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 2194 out of 3714 tested combinations. This places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, but the CPU is in the 94th percentile, indicating the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing.

Q: Should I use the Ultra preset at 1080p?

A: Yes. The 81 FPS average at 1080p Ultra is well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a high-quality visual experience with smooth performance. This is the best settings-to-performance ratio for this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a classic resolution-dependent shift in bottleneck. At 1080p, the CPU’s influence is more pronounced. The i7-14700K, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, ensures high frame rates even at Low settings, where the RX 9060 has spare capacity. The 175 FPS at 1080p Low suggests the CPU can feed the GPU with enough frames to saturate its output. As settings increase to Ultra, the GPU becomes more involved, but the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (4472 Passmark) prevents it from being a limiting factor.

Moving to 1440p, the balance tips toward the GPU. The average FPS at Low drops from 175 to 128, a 27% reduction, while the CPU’s workload remains relatively constant. At Ultra, the 60 FPS average indicates the RX 9060 is nearing its maximum output. The GPU’s 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 288 GB/s bandwidth are being fully utilized, while the CPU still has headroom.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant constraint. The difference between Low (83 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) is a 44 FPS swing, entirely attributable to GPU load. The CPU’s role diminishes further, as the pixel fill rate and shading requirements overwhelm the GPU. The RX 9060’s 64 ROPs and 1792 shading units are insufficient for 4K Ultra, confirming that the GPU is the primary factor limiting this combo’s high-resolution potential.

The scaling between resolutions is also telling. At Medium settings, the FPS drops from 124 at 1080p to 91 at 1440p (a 33 FPS loss) and then to 59 at 4K (another 32 FPS loss). This consistent degradation pattern highlights that the GPU’s compute and memory subsystems are the bottleneck, not the CPU. The i7-14700K’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 is more than sufficient for any resolution tested here.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700K’s nearest rivals are all AMD parts with similar average benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is nearly identical, with a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning it performs within a fraction of a percent. The AMD EPYC 9115 is 0.1% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.7% slower. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F trails by 0.9%. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the game is unlikely to be CPU-limited at the tested settings.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 sits in a tight cluster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 0.7% faster, making it a direct substitute with virtually identical performance. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and RX 7700 are both 1% faster, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% faster. None of these differences would produce a perceptible change in FPS. Gamers with an RTX 3060 Ti or RX 7700 should expect the same 4K limitations and 1080p/1440p strengths. The RX 9060’s 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms it is a mid-range part, and these rivals occupy the same performance tier.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of 3714 tested CPU-GPU combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing ranks 2194th. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is surprising given the CPU’s high percentile (94th). The ranking is dragged down by the GPU, which sits in the 59th percentile. This disparity suggests that many other combos pair the i7-14700K with a stronger GPU, or that the RX 9060 is often matched with weaker CPUs, resulting in a lower overall score.

The rank of 2194 means that 1519 other combinations outperformed it, while 1520 performed worse. This positions the combo as a solid mid-tier option. The data indicates that the CPU’s potential is not fully realized due to the GPU’s limits, particularly at 4K. Users upgrading from a weaker CPU but keeping the RX 9060 would see the GPU remain the limiting factor. Conversely, upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model would likely push this combo significantly higher in the rankings, as the CPU has ample headroom.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? Yes, with clear caveats at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system runs every preset above 60 FPS, including Ultra at 81 FPS. This is the resolution where the combo is most comfortable, offering a wide range of settings for competitive or casual play. At 2560x1440, all four presets meet the 60 FPS threshold, but Ultra is marginal at exactly 60 FPS average. For a consistent experience, High settings at 80 FPS are recommended.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable at Low settings, which yield 83 FPS. Medium settings fall below 60 FPS at 59 FPS, and High/Ultra are unplayable. The verdict by resolution is clear: 4K users should stick to Low, while 1440p and 1080p users can enjoy the full range of visual presets. The data confirms that the RX 9060 is the limiting factor, and players targeting 4K should consider a more powerful GPU. For 1080p and 1440p, this is a capable configuration that delivers smooth, high-FPS gameplay across all settings.