Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

73%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
280 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
130 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
206 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
96 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
62 FPS
5.7ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 13,745

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 62 82 94 133
1440p QHD 96 127 146 206
1080p Full HD 130 174 199 280

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 174
1920x1080 Low 280
1920x1080 Medium 199
1920x1080 Ultra 130
2560x1440 High 127
2560x1440 Low 206
2560x1440 Medium 146
2560x1440 Ultra 96
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Low 133
3840x2160 Medium 94
3840x2160 Ultra 62

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is an exceptionally capable combination for Lockdown Protocol, delivering a playable experience at every preset and resolution tested. The data confirms this combo ranks in the 82nd percentile of all tested configurations, and the measured frame rates show that it can comfortably handle the game's demands, with the most demanding settings still yielding well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The performance profile across resolutions and settings is consistent and strong, though the gaps between presets reveal how the hardware scales with load. At 1920x1080, the combo is clearly CPU-bound at lower settings, producing frame rates that range from very high to extreme. At Low settings, the average FPS reaches 280, which is the highest figure recorded for this combination. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 199 FPS, with a minimum of 169 FPS and a maximum of 229 FPS. High settings deliver 174 FPS on average, while Ultra, the most demanding preset, still maintains an average of 130 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with expected reductions. Low settings produce an average of 206 FPS, Medium yields 146 FPS with a minimum of 124 FPS and a maximum of 168 FPS, High delivers 127 FPS, and Ultra maintains 96 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is roughly consistent across presets, with an average drop of about 30% from the corresponding 1080p figures.

The 3840x2160 results show the GPU taking on more responsibility, though the combo remains well ahead of the playability threshold. At Low settings, the average FPS is 133. Medium settings produce an average of 94 FPS, with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 108 FPS. High settings yield 82 FPS, and Ultra, the most demanding preset, still manages an average of 62 FPS. The minimum FPS recorded at 4K Medium (80 FPS) is still far above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating smooth performance even during demanding scenes.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data shows that this combo can run the highest quality preset at every resolution while staying above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, delivering an average of 130 FPS. This is a strong result, as many systems would need to drop to High or Medium to achieve similar smoothness, but this configuration has enough headroom to run everything maxed out.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 96 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth high-refresh-rate experience at a common gaming resolution. The jump from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 34 FPS on average at Ultra settings, but the remaining headroom is substantial.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra as well, with an average of 62 FPS. While this is the lowest average recorded for this combo, it still meets the playable threshold exactly, with the average landing just above 60 FPS. For gamers who prioritize visual fidelity at 4K, this is a viable option, though those seeking higher frame rates could drop to High for 82 FPS or Medium for 94 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700K and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 685th out of 3714 total combos. This places it in the top 18% of all tested systems, a strong position that reflects the balance of a high-end CPU and a high-end GPU. The rank is primarily driven by the GPU's raw rasterization power, though the CPU's strong single-core and multi-core scores help ensure it does not bottleneck at lower resolutions.

The percentile data reinforces this: the CPU sits in the 94th percentile against all tested CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 55th percentile against all tested GPUs. The discrepancy suggests that the CPU is a top-tier part relative to the broader market, while the GPU, while still powerful, faces stiffer competition from other high-end cards. In the context of Lockdown Protocol specifically, the combo rank of 685 indicates that many other pairings with faster GPUs or more balanced configurations outperform it, but it remains firmly in the upper tier of systems.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355. The closest competitor is the AMD EPYC 9115, with a score of 69288, a delta of just 0.1% slower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, which is 0.2% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, 0.7% faster. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, 0.9% faster. These deltas are all within 1% of the i7-14700K, meaning that swapping to any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, assuming the GPU remains the same. The practical difference between any of these processors is negligible for this game.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has an average benchmark score of 13745. The nearest rivals are somewhat surprising given the performance class. The AMD Radeon 660M scores 13812, 0.5% faster, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13821, 0.5% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13871, 0.9% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543, which is 1.5% slower. These deltas are all within 1.5%, meaning that in synthetic benchmarks, these very different GPUs perform similarly. However, in actual gaming at high resolutions, the RX 7900 XT's larger memory bus and 20 GB of VRAM would likely separate it from the integrated and mobile parts. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, any of these GPUs would deliver similar average frame rates at the tested settings, though the RX 7900 XT's advantage may become more pronounced at 4K Ultra due to its memory bandwidth.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear shift in which component matters more as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays the dominant role, as evidenced by the massive jump in FPS from High to Low settings. At Low settings, the average FPS is 280, while at Ultra it drops to 130. This 150 FPS spread indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render at higher settings, making the GPU the limiting factor even at 1080p. However, the fact that Low settings at 1080p produce 280 FPS versus 133 FPS at 4K Low suggests that the CPU is still the primary driver at the lowest settings, as the GPU has less work to do.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU. The spread between Low (206 FPS) and Ultra (96 FPS) is 110 FPS, smaller than at 1080p but still substantial. The CPU remains capable of pushing high frame rates, but the GPU's workload increases enough to narrow the gap. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings shows reductions of roughly 26-30% across presets, indicating a mix of CPU and GPU limitation.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The spread between Low (133 FPS) and Ultra (62 FPS) is 71 FPS, the smallest of any resolution. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe, with average FPS dropping by 35% or more at every preset. This is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU has ample headroom and the rendering resolution dominates performance. For this combo, the i7-14700K's strong single-core performance ensures that it never becomes a limiting factor at 4K, allowing the RX 7900 XT to work at its full potential.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Lockdown Protocol at 4K Ultra?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 62, which meets the 60 FPS playable threshold. While this is the lowest average recorded, it is still technically playable.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra is the best settings preset at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 96 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth high-refresh-rate experience.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 685th out of 3714 tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 18% of all systems tested.

Q: Which component is more important for this game at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU is the limiting factor at higher settings, but the CPU's strong single-core performance allows for extremely high frame rates at Low settings (280 FPS), indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck.

Q: Are there any CPUs that would perform similarly to the i7-14700K in this game?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F all have average benchmark scores within 0.9% of the i7-14700K, meaning they would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average is 62 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra settings. The second lowest is 82 FPS at 3840x2160 High settings.