Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 47 | 50 | 74 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 71 | 81 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 95 | 112 | 154 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a compelling mid-range configuration for Lockdown Protocol, a 2024-released FPS title. The measured data, captured at three resolutions and four quality presets, reveals a system that is capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, but which requires significant settings adjustments to maintain playability at 4K. The following analysis details the optimal configurations, performance comparisons, and component-level insights derived strictly from the benchmark data.
Best Settings per Resolution
The most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold varies considerably by resolution.
At 1920x1080, the system achieves its maximum visual quality while remaining fluid. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 68.7 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best settings choice for Full HD, allowing for the highest level of graphical fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
Moving up to 2560x1440, the demands on the GPU increase, and the Ultra preset drops to 52.9 FPS average, falling below the playable threshold. The highest preset that remains playable is High, which produces an average of 71.1 FPS. Therefore, High is the recommended setting for 1440p, offering a significant visual upgrade over Medium while still providing a comfortable frame rate cushion.
At 3840x2160, the performance ceiling is much lower. The High preset averages just 47.3 FPS, and Medium is only slightly better at 50.4 FPS, both below the 60 FPS target. The only preset that achieves playability is Low, which reaches an average of 74.4 FPS. This is the sole option for a smooth 4K experience, indicating a substantial compromise in visual quality is necessary at this resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The benchmark data provides context for this specific combo by comparing it to other hardware configurations. For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700F’s performance is closely matched by several other processors. Its average benchmark score of 53620 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6505P, which scores 53701 (a negligible 0.2% difference). The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is also a very close competitor, scoring 53288, placing it 0.6% behind the i7-14700F. Similarly, the AMD EPYC 7313P trails by 0.8% with a score of 53206. These results indicate that the i7-14700F’s processing power is on par with a range of high-end workstation and desktop chips.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580’s average benchmark score of 23021 places it in a competitive segment. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 23061, a negligible 0.2% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% behind with a score of 22895, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 0.7% ahead with a score of 23172. The performance parity with these cards, particularly the older RTX 2080, suggests that users upgrading from such a GPU would see similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, albeit with the Arc B580’s more modern feature set. The data shows that this system's graphics performance is closely grouped with these alternatives, meaning the in-game experience would be nearly identical.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The detailed frame rate data shows a clear pattern of performance scaling across resolutions and settings. The highest frame rates are achieved at 1080p with Low settings, hitting an average of 154.2 FPS. From there, performance decreases as resolution and graphical load increase.
At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are as follows:
- Low: 154.2 FPS
- Medium: 112.0 FPS
- High: 94.9 FPS
- Ultra: 68.7 FPS
The step from Low to Medium is a significant 42.2 FPS drop, while the transition from High to Ultra is a more modest 26.2 FPS reduction. This indicates that the Ultra preset is particularly demanding, but the system still handles it comfortably.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally:
- Low: 109.7 FPS
- Medium: 80.9 FPS
- High: 71.1 FPS
- Ultra: 52.9 FPS
The gap between Low and Medium narrows to 28.8 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra widens to 18.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only one that fails to maintain an average above 60 FPS.
The 3840x2160 results show the system under its heaviest load:
- Low: 74.4 FPS
- Medium: 50.4 FPS
- High: 47.3 FPS
- Ultra: 36.1 FPS
Here, the performance penalty for each settings increase is steep. The difference between Low and Medium is 24.0 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra is 11.2 FPS. The data clearly shows that only the Low preset provides a playable experience at this resolution.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? The answer is a definitive yes, but with important caveats depending on the target resolution and desired graphical fidelity. The benchmark data confirms that the system meets the 60 FPS playable threshold in several configurations.
At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally capable. It not only clears the 60 FPS threshold with all presets, but it does so with significant headroom. The Ultra preset, the highest quality setting, achieves 68.7 FPS, making it fully playable. This is the ideal resolution for this combo, offering the best balance of visual quality and performance.
At 2560x1440, the system remains strong. The High preset is the recommended choice, delivering 71.1 FPS and ensuring a smooth experience. While Ultra is not playable, the visual difference between High and Ultra is often less impactful than the performance cost, making High the optimal choice for 1440p gaming.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to provide a high-quality experience. The only playable preset is Low, which averages 74.4 FPS. While this is above the 60 FPS threshold, it requires a significant reduction in visual fidelity. For users with a 4K display, the data suggests that either lowering the resolution to 1440p or accepting Low settings is necessary for smooth gameplay.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance data reveals how the workload is distributed between the Intel Core i7-14700F and the Intel Arc B580 across different resolutions.
The CPU, with its high benchmark scores (e.g., 35122 in Cinebench R23 multicore), provides a robust foundation that does not appear to be a bottleneck at any tested resolution. This is evident from the consistent frame rate scaling. For example, at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 85.5 FPS, showing that the GPU is the primary driver of performance changes. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would be more consistent across different GPU-heavy settings, especially at lower resolutions where the CPU has more work to do relative to the GPU.
The GPU’s role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution increases. The Arc B580’s performance, as measured by its 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs, is the determining factor for playability at higher settings. The data shows that at 1440p, the GPU cannot handle the Ultra preset, dropping from 71.1 FPS on High to 52.9 FPS on Ultra. This 18.2 FPS drop is a direct result of the GPU hitting its limits. This effect is even more pronounced at 4K, where the difference between Low and Medium is 24.0 FPS, and the Ultra preset plummets to 36.1 FPS. The scaling between resolutions confirms that the GPU is the primary performance limiter in this configuration, with the CPU providing ample headroom for the GPU to operate at its full potential.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: Yes, but only with Low settings. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Low settings is 74.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets (Medium, High, Ultra) fall below 60 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: The High preset is the best option for 2560x1440. It achieves an average of 71.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold, while the Ultra preset only manages 52.9 FPS and is not considered playable.
Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X in this system?
A: The benchmark data shows they are very closely matched. The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X's score of 53288. This indicates their processing performance is effectively equivalent.
Q: Is the Intel Arc B580's performance similar to any NVIDIA graphics cards?
A: Yes, the data shows it is closely comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080. The Arc B580 has an average score of 23021, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895, a difference of just 0.6%. It is also within 0.7% of the RTX 3080's score.
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate at 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset is 68.7 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it a viable option.
Q: Where does this specific combo rank among all tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2789 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2789 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This ranking places it in the 25th percentile of all configurations tested, indicating that a majority of other systems in the database deliver higher performance. This is a reflection of the GPU's performance, which sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is quite strong at the 91st percentile.
The low combo rank is a direct result of the GPU being the limiting factor. While the CPU is a top-tier performer, the Arc B580’s capabilities cap the overall system performance. The measured frame rates, particularly the inability to maintain 60 FPS at 4K with high settings, are consistent with a system that is ranked in the lower half. For users, this means that while the system is perfectly playable at 1080p and 1440p, it will not deliver the high-end performance that its CPU suggests it could. The data indicates that this is a balanced mid-range configuration, where the GPU is the primary determinant of its overall ranking in this particular game.