Lockdown Protocol

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT combination delivers a strong performance profile for Lockdown Protocol, with the data indicating that the system is capable of exceeding 60 FPS at every tested resolution and preset combination except for 4K Ultra. The measured results show a clear pattern where the GPU becomes the primary constraint only at the highest resolution and settings, while at lower resolutions, the headroom is substantial. This analysis breaks down the measured frames per second, compares the components to their nearest rivals, and provides specific guidance on the best settings to use for a smooth experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 4K gameplay with this system?

A: At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 71.6 FPS. The Ultra preset drops below the playable threshold at 52.3 FPS, while Medium and Low average 79.2 FPS and 111.4 FPS respectively.

Q: Can the system handle 1440p Ultra settings?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440 the Ultra preset is fully playable, with an average of 84.1 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, and the data shows that High, Medium, and Low presets also clear this mark at this resolution.

Q: How much performance headroom is available at 1080p?

A: The 1920x1080 results show significant headroom. The Ultra preset averages 115.4 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Low preset at this resolution reaches 240.2 FPS, indicating the system is far from being GPU-limited in most 1080p scenarios.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo in the game?

A: The lowest average FPS recorded in the measured data is 52.3 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset. This is the only tested configuration that falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. It is nearly identical in performance to the Intel Xeon 6505P, which scores 53701 with a -0.2% delta, and slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which scores 53288 with a 0.6% delta.

Q: Is the GPU's synthetic performance close to any other cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has an average benchmark score of 48477, placing it at the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival in the data is the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, which scores 47743 with a 1.5% delta, while the Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 with a -2.5% delta.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results for Lockdown Protocol indicate a shifting balance between CPU and GPU workload depending on the resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system's performance is exceptionally high across all presets, with the Low preset averaging 240.2 FPS and the Ultra preset averaging 115.4 FPS. This large gap between presets, combined with the very high absolute frame rates, suggests that the GPU is the primary scaling factor even at this resolution, but the CPU has enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 124.8 FPS, showing that the graphics workload scales significantly with settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern remains similar but with expected reductions. The Low preset averages 174.9 FPS, while Ultra drops to 84.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution is 90.8 FPS, which is a smaller absolute drop than at 1080p but still indicates GPU sensitivity. The CPU's role becomes more apparent when comparing the 1080p and 1440p results at the same preset. For example, High settings drop from 151.2 FPS at 1080p to 107.7 FPS at 1440p, a 43.5 FPS reduction. This moderate drop suggests that while the GPU is working harder at higher resolution, the CPU is still able to feed it adequately.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's influence becomes dominant. The Ultra preset falls to 52.3 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, while High averages 71.6 FPS. The scaling between Low (111.4 FPS) and Ultra (52.3 FPS) at 4K is 59.1 FPS, the largest absolute gap of any resolution. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is heavily taxed by the higher settings, and the CPU has ample capacity to keep up. The data shows that for this game and this combo, the GPU is the limiting factor at high resolutions and presets, while the CPU provides a robust foundation that does not constrain performance even at 1080p Low with 240.2 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the synthetic benchmark data, the Intel Core i7-14700F has an average score of 53620, which places it in a tight cluster of similarly performing processors. The closest rival is the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53701, a delta of only -0.2%, meaning the i7-14700F performs essentially identically in these tests. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, which is 0.6% lower, and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, which is 0.8% lower. These small deltas suggest that any of these CPUs would deliver very similar frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the game's performance at the tested settings is likely not limited by CPU throughput beyond a certain point.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT averages 48477 in synthetic benchmarks. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47743, which is 1.5% lower, making it a close performance match despite being a mobile part. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, which is 2.5% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, which is 3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001, also 3% higher. These deltas indicate that while the RX 6800 XT is competitive, there are several cards that would provide slightly higher or lower frame rates in practice. Given that the measured FPS data shows the RX 6800 XT hitting 115.4 FPS at 1080p Ultra, a card with a 3% higher synthetic score might achieve around 118.9 FPS in the same scenario, though this is an estimate based on the delta.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Lockdown Protocol with a smooth experience at most resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, all four tested presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the most demanding Ultra setting averaging 115.4 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin for high refresh rate monitors, and even the High preset at 151.2 FPS is well above the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS on all presets, with Ultra averaging 84.1 FPS. This makes 1440p Ultra a viable option for a fluid experience.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The High preset averages 71.6 FPS, which clears the threshold, and Low and Medium also remain playable at 111.4 FPS and 79.2 FPS respectively. However, the Ultra preset drops to 52.3 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS mark. Therefore, for 4K gameplay, users should stick to High settings or lower to maintain a playable frame rate. Overall, the system is capable of running the game well at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with reduced settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low averages 240.2 FPS, Medium averages 171 FPS, High averages 151.2 FPS, and Ultra averages 115.4 FPS. These numbers show a clear progression, with the gap between Low and Medium at 69.2 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra at 35.8 FPS. The system is clearly capable of high refresh rate gaming at this resolution, even with the most demanding settings.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 174.9 FPS for Low, 125.5 FPS for Medium, 107.7 FPS for High, and 84.1 FPS for Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across presets, with Low losing 65.3 FPS, Medium losing 45.5 FPS, High losing 43.5 FPS, and Ultra losing 31.3 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count efficiently, and the CPU is not introducing a bottleneck at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 111.4 FPS for Low, 79.2 FPS for Medium, 71.6 FPS for High, and 52.3 FPS for Ultra. The drop from 1440p to 4K is more pronounced for the lower presets: Low loses 63.5 FPS, Medium loses 46.3 FPS, High loses 36.1 FPS, and Ultra loses 31.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, highlighting the GPU's limits at this extreme resolution and settings combination.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ranks at position 1194 out of 3714 total combos. This places the system in the top 32% of all tested configurations, indicating that it is a solid performer for this game. The rank reflects the overall combination of CPU and GPU, and given the measured FPS data, it is clear that the system is well balanced for the game's demands. The high percentile rankings of the individual components (91st for the CPU and 85th for the GPU) contribute to this favorable position, though the game's specific engine and optimization can shift the practical ranking from the synthetic scores.

The combo rank of 1194 suggests that while there are many faster systems, there are also many slower ones. The measured FPS at 1080p and 1440p are strong, and the 4K results are playable at High settings. This puts the system in a good position for users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p, or for those who want to game at 4K with a compromise on settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which achieves an average of 71.6 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K gaming, as it provides a smooth experience while delivering better visual quality than Medium or Low. The Ultra preset at this resolution fails to hit the 60 FPS mark, so it should be avoided for competitive or fast-paced play.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it averages 84.1 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and it comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The system has enough headroom at this resolution to run the game at maximum settings without sacrificing smoothness. For users with 1440p displays, this is the optimal configuration.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is also the best choice, averaging 115.4 FPS. This provides a high quality image with a frame rate that is nearly double the playable threshold. The system's performance at 1080p is strong enough that users can enable the highest settings without concern, and there is still significant headroom for future driver optimizations or more demanding game updates. The data supports using Ultra at this resolution for the best balance of visuals and performance.