Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
249 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
114 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
181 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
84 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
56 FPS
6.4ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 56 74 83 118
1440p QHD 84 112 128 181
1080p Full HD 114 157 176 249

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 157
1920x1080 Low 249
1920x1080 Medium 176
1920x1080 Ultra 114
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Low 181
2560x1440 Medium 128
2560x1440 Ultra 84
3840x2160 High 74
3840x2160 Low 118
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 Ultra 56

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a robust experience in Lockdown Protocol, with measured performance that varies significantly across resolutions and quality presets. At 4K, the combo averages 74 FPS on High settings, while dropping to 55.8 FPS at Ultra, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Moving to 1440p, the pairing clears 60 FPS on every preset, including 84.3 FPS at Ultra. At 1080p, the system excels, hitting 248.7 FPS on Low and maintaining 113.6 FPS at Ultra, indicating substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate displays.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides average FPS readings for three resolutions—3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080—across four settings tiers: Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve is steep. Low settings produce 118.3 FPS, which is a strong result for 4K gaming. Medium settings reduce the average to 83.2 FPS, a 29.7% drop from Low. High settings yield 74 FPS, representing a further 11.1% decline from Medium. Ultra settings are the most demanding, with an average of 55.8 FPS—this is 27.8% slower than High and marks the only instance across all tested configurations where the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system shows much more consistency. Low settings average 181.4 FPS, which is 53.4% higher than the 4K Low result. Medium settings deliver 127.9 FPS, a 29.5% decrease from Low. High settings average 111.6 FPS, which is 12.7% lower than Medium. Ultra settings remain well above the threshold at 84.3 FPS, a 24.5% drop from High. The scaling from 4K to 1440p suggests that pixel count is a major factor, as every 1440p preset outperforms its 4K counterpart by a substantial margin.

At 1920x1080, the combo reaches its peak performance. Low settings produce 248.7 FPS, which is 37.1% higher than the 1440p Low result. Medium settings average 176 FPS, a 29.2% reduction from Low. High settings yield 156.9 FPS, which is 10.9% lower than Medium. Ultra settings still manage 113.6 FPS, a 27.6% drop from High. Notably, the gap between 1440p and 1080p is larger than the gap between 4K and 1440p, indicating that the RTX 3080 is increasingly CPU-bound at lower resolutions.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: each step up in settings reduces frame rates by roughly 10-30%, with the most severe penalties occurring at Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration that fails to maintain 60 FPS, making it the critical limitation for this hardware combination.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: Yes, but not on the highest preset. The measured results show that High, Medium, and Low settings at 3840x2160 all average above 60 FPS, with High at 74 FPS and Medium at 83.2 FPS. Ultra, however, drops to 55.8 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: Ultra is the best choice, as it maintains an average of 84.3 FPS. All other presets—High, Medium, and Low—also clear 60 FPS, with Low reaching 181.4 FPS, but Ultra provides the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 perform at 1080p with this CPU?

A: Exceptionally well. The lowest average is 113.6 FPS at Ultra, while Low settings reach 248.7 FPS. The system is clearly capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p, with even the most demanding preset staying well above 100 FPS.

Q: Which component is more important at 4K versus 1080p?

A: At 4K, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, evidenced by the significant frame rate differences between presets (74 FPS High vs. 55.8 FPS Ultra). At 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant, as the gap between Low and Ultra narrows in relative terms and the absolute frame rates are much higher, indicating that the RTX 3080 is less constrained by rendering load.

Q: Is the 55.8 FPS result at 4K Ultra a failure?

A: It falls short of the 60 FPS playability threshold, so it is not considered playable by the benchmark standard. However, the system still achieves 74 FPS at High settings, which is a playable alternative for 4K users.

Q: How does this combo rank among other tested systems?

A: It ranks 1060th out of 3714 total combos tested for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the upper portion of the field, though not near the top, suggesting that many other CPU-GPU pairings deliver higher frame rates.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals how the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 share the workload in Lockdown Protocol. The key observation is the scaling of performance as resolution changes, which directly indicates which component is the limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are heavily influenced by the GPU. The RTX 3080's rendering load increases dramatically with pixel count, and the data shows a steep decline in performance as settings rise. From Low to Ultra, the average drops from 118.3 FPS to 55.8 FPS, a 52.8% reduction. This wide spread suggests that the GPU is working near its limits, particularly at Ultra where it cannot sustain 60 FPS. The CPU, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, has ample headroom at this resolution, as the frame rate differences are primarily driven by GPU shader and memory workload.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The same settings progression yields frame rates from 181.4 FPS (Low) to 84.3 FPS (Ultra), a 53.5% reduction. The absolute numbers are higher than 4K, but the relative scaling is nearly identical, indicating that the GPU still dominates the performance equation. The CPU is likely not a bottleneck here, as even the highest frame rate of 181.4 FPS is well within the i7-12700KF's capabilities based on its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838.

At 1920x1080, the situation changes. The frame rates are much higher overall, with Low averaging 248.7 FPS and Ultra at 113.6 FPS. The percentage drop from Low to Ultra is 54.3%, similar to other resolutions, but the absolute numbers suggest that the CPU is becoming more influential. At 248.7 FPS, the CPU must process a large number of frames per second, and its single-thread performance—measured at 4071 in Cinebench R23 single-core—becomes a critical factor. The RTX 3080 is still powerful, but at 1080p, the rendering pipeline is less demanding, allowing the CPU to push frame rates higher than at 1440p or 4K.

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences between presets at all resolutions, as the relative scaling remains consistent. However, the CPU's role becomes more pronounced at 1080p, where the system achieves frame rates that approach the limits of what the processor can sustain. The i7-12700KF's 3.60 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide sufficient speed for high-FPS scenarios, but the RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are the clear determinants of visual quality at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 holds a rank of 1060 out of 3714 total combos. This places it in the 71.5th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of all tested systems while trailing the top performers.

The CPU's individual percentile is 85, indicating that the i7-12700KF is better than 85% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 35365, which is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T, which scores 35403 with a delta of -0.1%. The GPU's percentile is 68, with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P106-100, scores 23249 with a delta of -0.3%.

The combo rank of 1060 suggests that while both components are strong individually, their combined performance in Lockdown Protocol does not place them at the top. This could be due to the game's specific engine characteristics, which may favor other architectures or configurations. The rank implies that there are 1059 other combinations that achieve higher average FPS, likely including newer GPUs or CPUs with higher benchmark scores. However, the measured FPS data shows that this combo remains highly playable at all resolutions except 4K Ultra, so the rank reflects relative performance rather than a lack of capability.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Lockdown Protocol at playable frame rates across most configurations. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best choice at 74 FPS average. Ultra is not playable, as it drops to 55.8 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, all four settings—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra achieving 84.3 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset is playable as well, with Ultra at 113.6 FPS and Low reaching 248.7 FPS.

The system's performance is strong enough for 4K gaming, provided users avoid the Ultra preset. For 1440p and 1080p, the RTX 3080 and i7-12700KF combination delivers smooth frame rates even at maximum settings. The only caveat is 4K Ultra, which fails to meet the 60 FPS standard. Based on the data, this combo is a capable choice for high-resolution gaming, with the caveat that the most demanding preset at 4K requires a reduction in quality.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is identified, along with its exact average FPS.

At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, which averages 74 FPS. Medium is also playable at 83.2 FPS, and Low at 118.3 FPS, but High offers the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth performance. Ultra is excluded due to its 55.8 FPS result.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is Ultra, with an average of 84.3 FPS. This provides maximum graphical fidelity without dropping below the threshold. The other presets—High at 111.6 FPS, Medium at 127.9 FPS, and Low at 181.4 FPS—are all playable but offer lower quality.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is also Ultra, averaging 113.6 FPS. This is well above 60 FPS and delivers the highest quality. High at 156.9 FPS, Medium at 176 FPS, and Low at 248.7 FPS are all playable, but Ultra is the recommended choice for visual quality.

These recommendations highlight the system's versatility: it can handle Ultra settings at 1440p and 1080p, while requiring a drop to High at 4K to stay playable.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide insight into which other hardware would behave similarly in Lockdown Protocol.

For the Intel Core i7-12700KF, the nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-13700T, with an average benchmark score of 35403, which is just 0.1% lower than the i7-12700KF's score of 35365. This means the i7-13700T would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a 0.2% difference, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a -0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, also a 0.2% difference. All of these CPUs would deliver comparable performance, with differences well within the margin of error.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA P106-100, with an average score of 23249, which is 0.3% lower than the RTX 3080's 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, a -0.3% difference, and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, a -0.4% difference. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, also -0.4%. These GPUs would produce similar frame rates in GPU-bound situations, though the RTX 3080's specific features, such as ray tracing cores, are not reflected in the average benchmark score.

In practice, swapping the i7-12700KF for an i7-13700T or the RTX 3080 for an RX 6600M would result in very minor performance changes. The delta percentages are all within 0.4%, so users with these alternative components should expect comparable results in Lockdown Protocol at the tested settings and resolutions.