Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
258 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
122 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
191 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
89 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
125 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
58 FPS
6.2ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 41,187

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 76 89 125
1440p QHD 89 121 135 191
1080p Full HD 122 162 187 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 162
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 187
1920x1080 Ultra 122
2560x1440 High 121
2560x1440 Low 191
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 Ultra 89
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Low 125
3840x2160 Medium 89
3840x2160 Ultra 58

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

Lockdown Protocol, the 2024 FPS title, presents a demanding rendering load, and the Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti proves to be a formidable combination. The measured data indicates that this system handles the game with significant headroom, though the highest settings at 4K resolution will test its limits. The following analysis breaks down the performance characteristics, optimal configurations, and component behavior based strictly on empirical measurements.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of 60 FPS or higher is High, which delivers an average of 75.5 FPS. While the card can push beyond this, the Ultra preset dips to an average of 57.5 FPS, falling below the playable threshold. Low and Medium settings yield 125.4 and 88.6 FPS respectively, but High offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the system achieves playable performance across all tested presets. The most demanding option, Ultra, still produces an average of 89.1 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the clear choice for 1440p gaming, as it maximizes visual quality without sacrificing smoothness, while High at 120.5 FPS and Medium at 135.3 FPS provide even higher headroom for competitive play.

At 1920x1080, the i5-14600KF and RTX 3080 Ti combination overwhelms the game's requirements. The Ultra preset runs at an average of 121.6 FPS, making it the recommended setting for full-HD displays. Lower presets offer progressively higher frame rates—Medium at 187.3 FPS, High at 161.5 FPS, and Low at 257.5 FPS—but these are unnecessary given that Ultra already clears the 60 FPS bar by a wide margin.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the balance of load shifts between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all settings, suggesting that the RTX 3080 Ti is not fully saturated. The jump from Low at 257.5 FPS to Ultra at 121.6 FPS is substantial, but the sheer magnitude of these numbers indicates that the GPU has ample headroom, and the Intel Core i5-14600KF's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594) keeps the pipeline fed.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling becomes more linear with resolution demands. The Ultra preset drops from 121.6 FPS at 1080p to 89.1 FPS, a reduction of roughly 27%. This closer relationship between resolution and frame rate suggests the GPU is becoming the primary constraint, as the pixel count increases by 78% while performance drops by a smaller margin, indicating the CPU still has capacity to spare.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes dominant. Ultra preset performance falls to 57.5 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold, while the gap between Low (125.4 FPS) and Ultra (57.5 FPS) widens to over 2x. This dramatic scaling with settings at 4K confirms that the RTX 3080 Ti, with its 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, is the limiting factor at this resolution. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, while powerful, are not the bottleneck here, as even the most demanding preset at 4K shows consistent performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160: The data shows a clear hierarchy across settings. Low settings produce an average of 125.4 FPS, Medium achieves 88.6 FPS, High delivers 75.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 57.5 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a performance drop of 54%, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario at 4K.

2560x1440: At this resolution, the system shows more uniform scaling. Low runs at 191.1 FPS, Medium at 135.3 FPS, High at 120.5 FPS, and Ultra at 89.1 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 53%, similar to 4K, but all values remain well above the playable threshold.

1920x1080: The measurements reveal the highest performance tier. Low reaches 257.5 FPS, Medium hits 187.3 FPS, High produces 161.5 FPS, and Ultra maintains 121.6 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is 53%, consistent with other resolutions, but the absolute values indicate that the RTX 3080 Ti still has headroom even at Ultra settings.

The consistency in the percentage drop from Low to Ultra across all resolutions (approximately 53-54%) suggests that the game's settings have a uniform impact on GPU load, regardless of resolution. This is a useful indicator for players looking to predict performance at untested resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the Intel Core i5-14600KF, the nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks provide context for CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 0.3% higher on average, making it essentially equivalent in processing power. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% ahead, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 trails by 0.8%. At the other end, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 leads by 0.8%. These CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, as the game does not appear to be CPU-limited at the tested resolutions.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, the GPU rivals show a tight cluster. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 0.8% higher, while the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB is 1.2% lower and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 is 1.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 comes in 2% below the RTX 3080 Ti. These delta values are small enough that gaming performance in Lockdown Protocol would be nearly indistinguishable among these GPUs, though the Tesla cards are workstation-oriented and may lack the same driver optimization for gaming.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 57.5, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings at 75.5 FPS are the maximum playable option at this resolution.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 89.1 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that still clears the 60 FPS threshold. This provides the best visual quality without any performance concerns.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores within 0.8% of its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, and Intel Core Ultra 5 245. The only competitor more than 1% away is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, which leads by 0.8%.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high across all settings (121.6 FPS on Ultra), indicating the GPU is not fully utilized. The CPU's strong single-core performance is sufficient to drive these frame rates, making the system balanced at this resolution.

Q: What is the performance drop from Low to Ultra settings at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, Low settings average 125.4 FPS while Ultra averages 57.5 FPS, representing a 54% reduction in frame rate. This substantial drop indicates that the RTX 3080 Ti is heavily loaded at 4K with high settings.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to the RTX 5070?

A: According to synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 3080 Ti scores 2% higher than the RTX 5070, with average scores of 41187 versus 40377. In Lockdown Protocol, this translates to a very minor performance difference, likely only a few frames per second.

The Verdict

The data confirms that the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti can run Lockdown Protocol effectively at all three tested resolutions, with specific caveats for 4K. At 1920x1080, the system achieves a definitive pass on Ultra settings with 121.6 FPS, far exceeding the 60 FPS target. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings remain playable at 89.1 FPS, offering a high-quality experience with substantial headroom. At 3840x2160, the system passes at High settings with 75.5 FPS, but fails to maintain 60 FPS on Ultra, where it averages 57.5 FPS.

The RTX 3080 Ti, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 80 RT cores, handles the game's FPS rendering demands well up to 1440p Ultra. The i5-14600KF's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample processing power, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p where CPU performance is often the limiting factor. For players targeting 4K, dropping to High settings is the recommended approach, as it maintains smooth gameplay while sacrificing minimal visual quality. Overall, this pairing is a capable system for Lockdown Protocol, with the only notable compromise being the 4K Ultra preset.