Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Try lowering shadows and anti-aliasing for better FPS.
A better graphics card would significantly improve performance.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 66 | 76 | 106 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 102 | 117 | 165 |
| 1080p Full HD | 105 | 139 | 160 | 225 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti delivers a robust performance profile in Lockdown Protocol, a 2024-released FPS title. Measured benchmark data indicates this combination handles the game comfortably across most common gaming resolutions, with the primary limitation emerging only at 4K with maximum settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, component roles, ranking position, and optimal settings configurations based exclusively on the provided fact pack.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the resolution most frequently used for high-refresh-rate gaming, the combination produces excellent frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 225, which is exceptionally high and indicates the game is far from taxing at this preset. Medium settings yield an average of 160 FPS, with a minimum of 136 FPS and a maximum of 184 FPS, showing strong consistency. High settings still deliver a very playable average of 139 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to an average of 105 FPS. No minimum or maximum values are provided for Low, High, or Ultra at this resolution, but the averages alone demonstrate that every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a substantial margin.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the expected scaling pressure. Low settings produce an average of 165 FPS, which is still exceptionally smooth. Medium settings average 117 FPS, with a minimum of 99 FPS and a maximum of 135 FPS, indicating stable frame pacing. High settings average 102 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to an average of 77 FPS. Even at the most demanding setting available at this resolution, the average stays well above the 60 FPS threshold, meaning the hardware never bottlenecks the experience at 1440p.
At 3840x2160, also known as 4K, the performance picture changes notably. Low settings deliver an average of 106 FPS, which is impressive for this resolution and suggests the game scales well with reduced graphical load. Medium settings average 76 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS; the minimum here remains above 60 FPS but is close enough to warrant attention during intense scenes. High settings average 66 FPS, which still meets the playable threshold, though the margin is thinner. Ultra settings, however, produce an average of only 49 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the only configuration in the entire measured dataset where the combination fails to maintain playable performance.
The data shows a clear progression: as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, the average FPS decreases across all settings, but the relative gap between settings also changes. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 120 FPS (225 to 105). At 1440p, the difference is 88 FPS (165 to 77). At 4K, the difference is 57 FPS (106 to 49). This narrowing delta suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, compressing the performance range across settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals how the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti share the workload in Lockdown Protocol. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are extremely high, particularly at Low settings (225 FPS) and Medium settings (160 FPS). These numbers indicate that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough draw calls and game logic updates to sustain very high frame rates. The i5-14600KF, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, provides substantial single-thread performance as evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 2445 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594. This strong single-thread capability is crucial for FPS games, which often rely heavily on a single or few threads for game simulation.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS decreases across all settings compared to 1080p, but the drop is relatively moderate. For example, Low settings go from 225 to 165 FPS, a reduction of 60 FPS. This suggests that while the GPU is becoming more engaged, the CPU still has headroom to keep frame rates high. The RTX 3070 Ti, with 6144 shading units and 48 RT cores, begins to matter more at this resolution, but the overall performance remains well above the playable threshold at every setting.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes dominant. The average FPS at Low settings drops to 106, and at Ultra settings to 49. The fact that even Low settings at 4K yields about half the frame rate of Low settings at 1080p (106 vs 225) points directly to GPU-bound behavior. The RTX 3070 Ti’s 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are being pushed harder as pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K. The CPU, which was likely underutilized at 1080p, has more idle time at 4K because the GPU cannot keep up with the rendering workload.
The scaling between presets also clarifies component roles. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS by 53% (225 to 105). At 4K, the same preset change reduces average FPS by 54% (106 to 49). This similarity in percentage scaling is interesting, but the absolute values tell the story: at 1080p, even Ultra stays above 100 FPS, meaning the CPU is not the bottleneck; at 4K, Ultra falls below 60, meaning the GPU is saturated. The data indicates that for this game, the RTX 3070 Ti is the primary determinant of frame rates at 1440p and above, while the i5-14600KF provides sufficient headroom to avoid CPU limitations even at the highest settings and lowest resolutions.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?*
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 105, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This configuration is fully playable and leaves headroom for potential frame drops in intense scenes.
Q: What is the maximum playable setting at 3840x2160?
A: At 4K, the highest setting that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is High, with a measured average of 66 FPS. Medium settings average 76 FPS, and Low settings average 106 FPS, but Ultra settings fall below the threshold at 49 FPS.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?
A: At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 160 at 1080p to 117 at 1440p and then to 76 at 4K. This represents a reduction of 84 FPS from 1080p to 4K, or roughly a 53% decrease in average frame rate.
Q: Are the frame rates stable at Medium settings across resolutions?
A: The data includes minimum and maximum values for Medium settings. At 1080p, the min is 136 and max is 184; at 1440p, the min is 99 and max is 135; at 4K, the min is 64 and max is 87. In all cases, the minimum remains above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating stable performance.
Q: Does the RTX 3070 Ti bottleneck the CPU at any resolution?
A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 49, which is below the playable threshold, suggesting the GPU is fully saturated. At lower resolutions and settings, the frame rates are high enough that the CPU is likely not the limiting factor, given the i5-14600KF’s strong single-thread benchmark scores.
Q: Which resolution offers the best balance of quality and performance for this combo?
A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average FPS is 77, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and offers the highest visual quality available at that resolution. This provides a better visual experience than 1080p Ultra while maintaining playable frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database for Lockdown Protocol, this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti holds the rank of 1324 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the upper portion of the distribution, specifically within the top 35.6% of all tested configurations. The percentile ranking for the CPU alone is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in the database, while the GPU has a percentile of 75, outperforming 75% of all GPUs.
The combo rank of 1324 out of 3714 reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in terms of their respective percentile positions. This is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows the CPU providing ample headroom at lower resolutions while the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K Ultra. The rank indicates that while this is not a top-tier combination for Lockdown Protocol, it is significantly above average and capable of delivering playable performance in most scenarios.
The fact that the combo ranks at 1324 despite the CPU’s high percentile suggests that the GPU’s lower percentile relative to the CPU has a moderating effect. In a game that scales heavily with resolution, the GPU’s 75th percentile position is likely the more critical determinant of overall ranking. The data shows that the combo performs best at 1440p and below, where the CPU’s strength can be fully utilized, and struggles only at 4K Ultra, where the GPU’s limits become apparent.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-14600KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti can run Lockdown Protocol with playable performance across most configurations. At 1920x1080, all four settings—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—produce average FPS values above the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest being Ultra at 105 FPS. This resolution is fully playable with no exceptions.
At 2560x1440, the same complete set of settings is playable. Low averages 165 FPS, Medium 117 FPS, High 102 FPS, and Ultra 77 FPS. All values are comfortably above 60 FPS, making 1440p a strong choice for this hardware, especially at Ultra settings where the visual quality is highest.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is conditional. Low, Medium, and High settings all clear the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 106, 76, and 66 FPS respectively. Ultra settings, however, fall short with an average of 49 FPS. Therefore, 4K is playable but requires avoiding the Ultra preset. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which provides an average of 66 FPS, leaving only a small buffer above the threshold.
In summary, this PC can run the game at 1080p and 1440p with any settings, and at 4K with settings up to High. The only configuration that fails to meet the 60 FPS playable threshold is 4K Ultra, where the average drops to 49 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with a measured average of 105 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and the performance headroom is substantial, indicating that players can enjoy maximum visual fidelity without concern for frame rate dips.
At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, with an average of 77 FPS. While this is lower than at 1080p, it still provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum FPS at this resolution and setting is not provided, but the average suggests stable performance.
For 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 66 FPS. This is the only setting above 60 FPS at 4K among the higher presets, as Ultra falls to 49 FPS. Medium settings average 76 FPS and Low settings average 106 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while still meeting the playability criterion. The minimum FPS for High at 4K is not listed, but the average is only 6 FPS above the threshold, so users should be prepared for potential drops in demanding scenes.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU, several hardware combinations would behave similarly to the i5-14600KF and RTX 3070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has an average benchmark score of 49228, which is 0.3% higher than the i5-14600KF’s average score. This difference is negligible, so swapping the Intel processor for this AMD part would yield nearly identical frame rates. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, 0.4% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, 0.8% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% lower than the i5-14600KF. All these CPUs are within 1% of each other, meaning the choice among them would not noticeably alter game performance.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has an average score of 29928, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti’s score. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30095, 0.5% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 29783, 0.5% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30433, which is 1.6% higher. These deltaPct values are all small, indicating that any of these GPUs would produce FPS figures within a few percent of the RTX 3070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol.
When considering alternative combos, pairing the i5-14600KF with any of these GPUs would maintain similar performance characteristics, as would pairing the RTX 3070 Ti with any of the rival CPUs. The measured FPS data would shift by roughly the deltaPct values, meaning at 4K Ultra, where the RTX 3070 Ti already struggles at 49 FPS, a GPU with 1.6% higher performance (like the RX 6700) would still likely fall short of 60 FPS. Conversely, a CPU with 0.8% higher performance would have no practical impact at lower resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck. Users seeking slightly better 4K performance could consider the RX 6800 or RX 6700, but the improvements would be marginal, and the overall playable settings profile would remain unchanged.