Lockdown Protocol

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX delivers a benchmark showing that Lockdown Protocol is highly playable across all tested configurations. The combo ranks 496th out of 3,714 tested combinations, placing it in the top 13.4% of all systems. Measured frame rates are consistently high, with every tested resolution and preset combination exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold, making this a robust setup for the FPS title.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of 3,714 tested CPU and GPU combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this pairing holds rank 496. This position places the system comfortably in the upper tier of tested hardware, indicating that the combination of the i5-14600KF and RX 7900 XTX is well-suited for the game’s demands. The data shows strong performance headroom, as even the most demanding tested setting—Ultra at 4K—produces an average of 68 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

The ranking reflects a balanced system where neither component becomes a significant bottleneck at standard gaming resolutions. At 1080p, the average frame rates range from 140.8 FPS on Ultra to 302 FPS on Low, showing that the system has substantial capacity for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 1440p results are equally impressive, with Ultra settings averaging 100.6 FPS and Low settings reaching 224 FPS. This performance profile indicates that the combo is not merely playable but offers a smooth experience with room for demanding visual configurations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly. The Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, scores 49,228, a negligible 0.3% difference. This means the Ryzen 9 7900 would deliver nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (score 49,196, delta 0.4%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (score 48,995, delta 0.8%) are within a single percentage point, making them effectively interchangeable for this game. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores slightly higher at 49,796, a -0.8% delta, indicating marginally better performance.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX holds a 64th percentile ranking among all GPUs with an average score of 19,410. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, scores 19,334, a 0.4% delta. This is a surprising comparison given the generational gap, but the data shows these two cards produce similar average benchmark scores. The NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (score 19,602, delta -1%) and AMD FirePro D300 (score 19,637, delta -1.2%) are also close, while the NVIDIA TITAN Xp (score 19,177, delta 1.2%) trails slightly. In practice, these GPUs would yield comparable frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, though the RX 7900 XTX’s advantage in raw specifications like 24 GB of memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth may manifest in other workloads.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the CPU and GPU contributions shift across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound at lower settings, evidenced by the dramatic scaling from Low (302 FPS) to Ultra (140.8 FPS). The 2.14x difference between these presets suggests that the GPU becomes more stressed as visual fidelity increases, but the CPU still has headroom to push frame rates well beyond 200 FPS at Low settings. This indicates the i5-14600KF’s 14 cores and 20 threads are sufficient to feed the RX 7900 XTX even at high frame rates.

Moving to 1440p, the scaling pattern holds but with reduced absolute values. Low settings average 224 FPS, while Ultra drops to 100.6 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 2.23x, slightly larger than at 1080p, showing that the GPU’s workload is increasing. At 4K, the system becomes more GPU-bound, with Low averaging 140.9 FPS and Ultra at 68 FPS—a 2.07x scaling factor. The RX 7900 XTX’s 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are critical here, as the higher resolution demands more memory throughput. The CPU’s role diminishes at 4K, but the i5-14600KF’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,594) ensures it does not bottleneck the GPU.

Across all resolutions, the gap between Medium and High presets is relatively small. At 4K, Medium averages 100.7 FPS versus High’s 90.4 FPS, a 10.2% difference. This suggests that the High preset adds visual features that disproportionately impact performance, while the jump from High to Ultra (90.4 to 68 FPS) is a 24.8% reduction. This pattern indicates that the Ultra preset includes particularly demanding effects, and the GPU’s 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 compute is the limiting factor at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 68 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. The verdict data confirms that all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 4K.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?

A: The best setting per the verdict is Ultra, which achieves an average of 100.6 FPS at 2560x1440. This provides the highest visual fidelity while maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RX 7900 XTX compare to its nearest GPU rival in this game?

A: The RX 7900 XTX’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, has an average benchmark score only 0.4% lower. However, this comparison is based on synthetic benchmarks, and the RX 7900 XTX’s superior specifications (24 GB memory, 384-bit bus) would likely provide a larger advantage in actual game scenarios.

Q: Is the i5-14600KF a bottleneck for the RX 7900 XTX?

A: The data suggests minimal bottlenecking. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 302 FPS, indicating the CPU can drive very high frame rates. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 68 FPS, which is typical of GPU-bound workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs supports its capability to keep pace.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the average is 189 FPS, while at 2560x1440 High, it drops to 135.7 FPS—a 28.2% reduction. This scaling is consistent with the increased pixel count.

Q: Are all presets playable at every resolution?

A: Yes, the verdict data shows that Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets are all playable at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. The lowest average frame rate recorded is 68 FPS at 4K Ultra, which still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all combinations of resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates: Low averages 302 FPS, Medium 212.6 FPS, High 189 FPS, and Ultra 140.8 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1080p gaming is exceptionally smooth, with even the most demanding preset maintaining a frame rate suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down predictably. Low settings average 224 FPS, Medium 159.2 FPS, High 135.7 FPS, and Ultra 100.6 FPS. The 1440p results show a 25.9% reduction from 1080p at Ultra settings, which is consistent with the additional pixel workload.

At 3840x2160, the system still clears the playability threshold at all presets. Low averages 140.9 FPS, Medium 100.7 FPS, High 90.4 FPS, and Ultra 68 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the closest to the 60 FPS threshold, but it maintains a comfortable 8 FPS margin. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra is a 32.4% reduction, reflecting the 2.25x increase in pixel count.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the Ultra preset. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 68 FPS, which is the lowest measured result but still above the threshold. This makes Ultra the recommended setting for 4K, as it provides the highest visual quality without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 100.6 FPS, offering a significant margin above 60 FPS. This allows for smooth gameplay even during intense scenes with multiple enemies or effects. The 1440p Ultra result is 32.6 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result, showing that the extra pixels at 4K cost 32.4% of the frame rate.

At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 140.8 FPS, which is more than double the playability threshold. This setting is ideal for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors, as the frame rate is sufficient to take full advantage of 144Hz or even 240Hz displays. The 1080p Ultra result is 72.8 FPS higher than the 1440p Ultra result.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol at all tested resolutions and presets, with every configuration exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 3840x2160, the system achieves playable frame rates across Low (140.9 FPS), Medium (100.7 FPS), High (90.4 FPS), and Ultra (68 FPS). The best setting at 4K is Ultra, with an average of 68 FPS, which is only 8 FPS above the threshold but still a comfortable margin.

At 2560x1440, the system excels, with Ultra settings averaging 100.6 FPS and Low settings reaching 224 FPS. The best setting is Ultra, and the frame rate is high enough to support smooth gameplay on fast-paced FPS titles. At 1920x1080, performance is exceptional, with Ultra averaging 140.8 FPS and Low reaching 302 FPS. The best setting is Ultra, which provides the highest visual fidelity with a frame rate that exceeds 140 FPS.

The data confirms that the Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination is more than capable of running Lockdown Protocol at maximum settings across all common resolutions. The system ranks in the top 13.4% of tested combos, and its measured performance shows no weak points. For users with a 4K display, the 68 FPS Ultra result is playable, but those prioritizing higher frame rates may prefer 1440p, where Ultra delivers 100.6 FPS.