Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 47 | 55 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 74 | 81 | 117 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 95 | 115 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is a pairing that pits a high-core-count modern CPU against an older but still relevant GPU. The database shows this combination produces a wide spread of results in Lockdown Protocol, depending entirely on resolution and quality preset. The data reveals a system that can comfortably handle 1080p and 1440p gaming, but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K with higher detail settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded measurements for this CPU and GPU combination in Lockdown Protocol show a clear pattern: performance scales downward as resolution increases, and the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens significantly at higher pixel counts.
At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally capable. With Low settings, the average frame rate hits 156 FPS. Medium settings still deliver 114.5 FPS, and High settings produce 95.3 FPS. Even the most demanding preset, Ultra, maintains an average of 72.8 FPS. This resolution is clearly where this hardware shines, with all settings staying well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains respectable. Low settings average 116.8 FPS, Medium settings fall to 80.6 FPS, and High settings produce 74 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, dips to 55.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This means 1440p requires dropping from the highest preset to maintain smooth gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its age. Low settings average 76.5 FPS, which is still playable. Medium settings drop to 55 FPS, High settings fall further to 46.5 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 33.6 FPS. The jump between Low and Medium at 4K is substantial, representing a 21.5 FPS difference, which suggests the RX 5700 XT hits a rendering bottleneck as shader complexity increases.
The data shows no minimum or maximum FPS values recorded, only averages. The trend across resolutions is consistent: the RX 5700 XT provides enough fill rate for lower presets, but the 8 GB frame buffer and RDNA 1.0 architecture limit high-detail performance at 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The database places the Intel Core i5-14600KF in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. Its nearest rivals are extremely close in raw performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228, a mere 0.3% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, 0.4% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, 0.8% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% ahead. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Lockdown Protocol, meaning the choice between them comes down to platform features rather than gaming performance.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT sits in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16361. Its nearest rivals are a mixed group. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, a 0.1% difference, effectively a tie. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, which is 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, also 0.3% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, 0.9% ahead. These results indicate that the RX 5700 XT's gaming performance is closely matched by several workstation-oriented cards, but none of these rivals would change the fundamental FPS picture in Lockdown Protocol. Users with any of these GPUs should expect similar behavior at each resolution and preset.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: Yes, but only with Low settings. The measured average at 3840x2160 with Low settings is 76.5 FPS. Medium settings drop to 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, so higher presets are not viable at 4K.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this hardware?
A: High settings provide the best visual quality while staying above 60 FPS, with an average of 74 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 55.5 FPS, so they are not recommended for smooth gameplay.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary constraint even at 1080p. The average frame rates range from 156 FPS at Low to 72.8 FPS at Ultra, showing a clear GPU-bound scaling. The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, placing it in the 90th percentile, so it has ample headroom for this game's FPS demands.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?
A: The database shows this combination ranks 2707 out of 3714 tested combos for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the field, reflecting the GPU's age more than the CPU's capability.
Q: Are there settings that produce over 100 FPS at 1440p?
A: Yes. Low settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 116.8 FPS. Medium settings drop to 80.6 FPS, and High settings to 74 FPS, so only Low exceeds 100 FPS at this resolution.
Q: Does the game favor higher resolution or higher settings for this hardware?
A: The measured data shows resolution has a larger impact. Dropping from 1080p to 1440p at High settings reduces average FPS from 95.3 to 74, a 21.3 FPS loss. Dropping from High to Medium at 1440p only reduces FPS from 74 to 80.6, an improvement of 6.6 FPS. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and 8 GB frame buffer become more strained as pixel count rises.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Lockdown Protocol? Yes, but the answer depends heavily on the display resolution. The database's verdict by resolution is clear.
At 1920x1080, every preset is playable. The system clears the 60 FPS threshold with all four settings, and Ultra still averages 72.8 FPS. This is the ideal environment for this hardware.
At 2560x1440, three of four presets are playable. High settings average 74 FPS, Medium averages 80.6 FPS, and Low averages 116.8 FPS. Ultra is the outlier at 55.5 FPS, so users should avoid it for competitive play.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, with an average of 76.5 FPS. Medium drops to 55 FPS, High to 46.5 FPS, and Ultra to 33.6 FPS. The RX 5700 XT's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-detail 4K rendering in this title.
The overall picture is a system that delivers excellent 1080p performance, good 1440p performance with preset adjustments, and limited 4K capability. The 60 FPS threshold is achievable at 4K only by sacrificing visual fidelity to the lowest preset.
Best Settings per Resolution
The database identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra. The measured average FPS at this preset is 72.8, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. This allows users to experience the full visual quality of Lockdown Protocol without performance concerns.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are High. This preset averages 74 FPS, staying above the threshold while providing significantly better visuals than Medium or Low. Ultra is not viable here, as it drops to 55.5 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the best settings are Low. This preset averages 76.5 FPS, which is above the threshold, but it represents a major visual compromise. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, so they are not recommended for smooth gameplay.
The pattern is clear: the RX 5700 XT can maintain 60 FPS at higher presets only when the pixel count is lower. At 4K, the GPU's compute resources, rated at 9.754 TFLOPS with 2560 shading units, are stretched too thin for anything beyond Low.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database's ranking for Lockdown Protocol, this specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 2707 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the 27th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 73% of other combinations deliver better performance in this game.
This ranking reflects the GPU's age more than the CPU's capability. The RX 5700 XT was released in 2019 and is now end-of-life, with a 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The i5-14600KF, by contrast, ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, showing it is a top-tier processor. The mismatch between these two components means the GPU is the bottleneck in Lockdown Protocol, pulling the overall combo ranking down despite the CPU's strength.
The measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 4K Ultra, the system produces 33.6 FPS, which is a GPU-limited result. Even at 1080p Low, the 156 FPS average shows the GPU can still leverage the CPU's headroom, but the scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution indicates the GPU's limits are reached before the CPU's.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor in Lockdown Protocol for this system. The Intel Core i5-14600KF, with 14 cores and 20 threads, is never the limiting factor. The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, dictates performance at every resolution and preset.
At 1920x1080, the scaling between presets shows the GPU's impact. Low averages 156 FPS, Medium 114.5 FPS, High 95.3 FPS, and Ultra 72.8 FPS. The CPU has enough single-thread and multi-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 scores of 4594 single-core and 32544 multi-core, to feed the GPU at all settings. The 69 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is purely a GPU rendering workload difference.
At 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with lower absolute values. Low averages 116.8 FPS, Medium 80.6 FPS, High 74 FPS, and Ultra 55.5 FPS. The drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low is 39.2 FPS, showing the GPU's fill rate limits are approached as pixel count increases. The RX 5700 XT's 121.9 GPixel/s pixel rate and 304.8 GTexel/s texture rate are the relevant metrics here.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes dominant. Low averages 76.5 FPS, but Medium falls to 55 FPS, a 21.5 FPS drop. High and Ultra produce 46.5 and 33.6 FPS respectively. The 4K pixel count is four times 1080p, and the data shows the GPU cannot maintain playable frame rates at higher presets. The CPU's performance is effectively irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU is fully saturated.
The database's measurements show no evidence of CPU bottlenecking at any setting. The 14th Gen Intel processor has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz and an L3 cache of 24 MB, which are more than sufficient for this FPS title. The GPU, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus, is the constraining factor, particularly at 1440p Ultra and all 4K presets above Low.