Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Lockdown Protocol
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 57 | 76 | 87 | 122 |
| 1440p QHD | 88 | 118 | 135 | 190 |
| 1080p Full HD | 120 | 161 | 184 | 259 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a formidable combination for Lockdown Protocol, placing in the 936th position out of 3,714 tested combos. This places the pairing in the top quartile of all tested systems, indicating that it delivers well above-average performance for this FPS title. The data shows a system that is not merely capable but one that offers headroom across most settings, with the only significant compromise appearing at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 936 out of 3,714 tested combinations is a strong indicator of its overall standing. It suggests that this pairing outperforms roughly 75% of all other CPU-GPU combinations tested in Lockdown Protocol. This high percentile ranking is consistent with the hardware’s individual benchmark scores; the CPU sits in the 90th percentile among all processors, and the GPU is in the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards. While neither component is at the absolute top of the charts, their combination yields a balanced system that avoids significant bottlenecks in this game.
Benchmark results indicate that the i5-14600K’s average benchmark score of 48,618 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, with a negligible performance delta. Similarly, the RTX 3080 Ti’s average score of 41,187 is closely matched by its nearest competitors. This suggests that the combo’s ranking is not dependent on a single component dominating, but rather on the effective synergy between the two. The system’s performance is consistent with what its individual parts suggest, making it a predictable and reliable choice for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and a smooth 4K experience at medium to high settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Lockdown Protocol. At 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-limited, as evidenced by the massive frame rate jump from 161 FPS at High to 259 FPS at Low settings. This 98 FPS difference when dropping from High to Low shows that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than it can render at lower graphical loads. The GPU becomes the primary constraint at this resolution, and the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance is more than sufficient to keep up.
As resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU’s workload grows, but the CPU still holds its own. The frame rates remain high, with the Ultra preset still averaging 88 FPS. The scaling from High (118 FPS) to Low (190 FPS) is still substantial, but the gap narrows compared to 1080p. This indicates that while the GPU is under more stress, the CPU’s role in maintaining high minimum frame rates remains important. The system is more balanced at this resolution, with both components contributing significantly to the overall experience.
At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the CPU’s role diminishes. The difference between High (76 FPS) and Low (122 FPS) settings is still pronounced, but the overall frame rates are much lower. The Ultra preset drops to 57 FPS, showing that the RTX 3080 Ti’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are being pushed to their limits. The CPU’s performance is still adequate, but the game’s demands at this resolution are squarely on the graphics card. The data shows that for maximum frame rates, particularly at 1080p, the CPU has ample headroom, while the GPU is the limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of the system’s performance across all settings and resolutions.
At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 259 FPS, showcasing the CPU’s ability to generate frames without GPU interference. The Medium preset averages 184 FPS, with a minimum of 156 FPS and a maximum of 211 FPS, showing excellent frame pacing. High settings average 161 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a high average of 120 FPS. This resolution is clearly where this combo excels, offering frame rates well beyond what most high-refresh-rate monitors can display.
Moving to 2560x1440, the system remains extremely capable. The Low preset averages 190 FPS, while Medium averages 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS. High settings deliver 118 FPS, and Ultra settings still produce a very playable 88 FPS. The data shows a smooth progression, with each preset tier offering a significant step up in visual fidelity for a manageable cost in frame rate. This resolution represents the sweet spot for this hardware, balancing visual quality and performance.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become apparent. The Low preset averages 122 FPS, which is still very smooth, and Medium averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. High settings produce a solid 76 FPS average, which clears the playable threshold comfortably. However, the Ultra preset drops to an average of 57 FPS, falling just short of the 60 FPS target. The data indicates that 4K gaming is viable, but users will need to make a choice between high visual fidelity and a locked 60 FPS experience.
The Verdict
This PC can definitively run Lockdown Protocol, and it does so exceptionally well at most settings. The verdict data shows that at 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 120 FPS. Similarly, at 2560x1440, all presets are playable, with Ultra being the best option at an average of 88 FPS. The system is more than capable of delivering a high-refresh-rate experience at these resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the system still delivers a playable experience, but with limitations. The High, Low, and Medium presets all clear the 60 FPS threshold, with High being the best playable setting at an average of 76 FPS. However, the Ultra preset falls short at 57 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. The verdict is clear: for 4K gaming, users should stick to High settings or lower to ensure a smooth experience. For the vast majority of players targeting 1440p or 1080p, this combo offers an outstanding experience with the ability to max out settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide a useful reference for users considering similar hardware. For the Intel Core i5-14600K, the closest performing alternatives are the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which scores 0.2% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4345P, which scores 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is 0.7% slower, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% faster. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning users would experience virtually identical CPU-bound performance in Lockdown Protocol with any of these processors.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti’s nearest rivals are a more mixed group. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 0.8% lower, while the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB is 1.2% faster and the standard Tesla M40 is 1.7% faster. Interestingly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 2% lower. These differences are small, so the in-game performance with any of these cards would be very similar to the RTX 3080 Ti. However, it is worth remembering the Tesla cards are not consumer gaming products and may lack the same driver support. The RTX 5070, despite a lower average benchmark score, would be a more relevant modern comparison for gaming.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Lockdown Protocol at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system averages 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset is the best playable option at this resolution, averaging 76 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The data shows that all presets are playable at 2560x1440. The Ultra preset is the best option, delivering an average of 88 FPS, which provides a high level of visual fidelity while maintaining a smooth frame rate.
Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its closest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600K’s average benchmark score of 48,618 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 0.2% faster, the AMD EPYC 4345P is 0.3% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% faster. These differences are negligible in practice.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti a good match for this CPU in this game?
A: Yes. The data shows the combo ranks in the top quartile of all tested systems (936 out of 3,714). The performance scaling across resolutions indicates a balanced pairing, with the GPU becoming the primary limiter at 4K and the CPU providing ample headroom at 1080p.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with High settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system averages 161 FPS. The Medium preset averages 184 FPS, and the Low preset averages 259 FPS, showing that the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Does the system maintain smooth frame pacing at Medium settings?
A: Yes. The Medium preset at 1080p has a minimum of 156 FPS and a maximum of 211 FPS. At 1440p, the Medium preset has a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS, and at 4K, it has a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. These ranges indicate consistent performance without major stutters.