Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
249 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
115 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
181 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
87 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
120 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
54 FPS
6.4ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 48,618
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 73 82 120
1440p QHD 87 112 128 181
1080p Full HD 115 157 175 249

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 157
1920x1080 Low 249
1920x1080 Medium 175
1920x1080 Ultra 115
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Low 181
2560x1440 Medium 128
2560x1440 Ultra 87
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Low 120
3840x2160 Medium 82
3840x2160 Ultra 54

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a decisive performance tier for Lockdown Protocol, clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution tested. At 4K, the system holds a comfortable 73.3 FPS on High settings, while at 1440p and 1080p it can push to Ultra presets with 87 FPS and 115 FPS respectively. This combination ranks in the 1057th position out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the upper third of all systems benchmarked for this title. The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where the GPU becomes the primary constraint only at the highest resolution, while the CPU’s headroom allows for substantial scaling at lower resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, producing an average of 73.3 FPS. The step down to Medium yields 81.8 FPS, but High represents the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance headroom. Ultra at this resolution drops to 53.6 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold, so it is not recommended for consistent gameplay.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the system reaches Ultra settings with an average of 87 FPS, which is the best playable configuration. This is a substantial jump from 4K, where Ultra was unplayable. The data shows that 1440p Ultra outperforms 4K High by 13.7 FPS, demonstrating that the resolution reduction provides significant headroom for higher graphical fidelity. Medium and High settings at this resolution produce 128 FPS and 111.6 FPS respectively, but Ultra remains the clear choice for maximum quality without sacrificing smoothness.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system achieves Ultra settings with an average of 115 FPS, the highest playable preset. This is the strongest result in the entire dataset, with Low settings reaching 248.9 FPS, Medium at 175.3 FPS, and High at 157.3 FPS. The 1080p Ultra result is 28 FPS higher than the 1440p Ultra result, confirming that this resolution is where the hardware truly stretches its legs. For competitive play, the Low preset’s 248.9 FPS offers a massive advantage, but for general use, Ultra at 115 FPS is the recommended choice.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-14600K and the RTX 3080. At 4K, the GPU is the dominant factor, as evidenced by the dramatic drop from 73.3 FPS on High to 53.6 FPS on Ultra — a 19.7 FPS penalty that reflects the GPU’s memory bandwidth limits at 760.3 GB/s and its 10 GB GDDR6X frame buffer. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution, as shown by the fact that even Low settings at 4K achieve 120.3 FPS, indicating no CPU bottleneck.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The RTX 3080 still carries most of the load, but the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes more relevant. The scaling from 4K High (73.3 FPS) to 1440p High (111.6 FPS) is a 38.3 FPS improvement, which is proportional to the pixel count reduction (3840x2160 has 2.25x the pixels of 2560x1440). This linear scaling suggests the GPU remains the limiting factor. However, the jump to 1440p Ultra at 87 FPS, compared to 4K Ultra at 53.6 FPS, shows that the CPU can sustain higher frame rates when the GPU is less stressed.

At 1080p, the CPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The 1440p to 1080p transition (2560x1440 vs 1920x1080, a 1.78x pixel reduction) yields only a 28 FPS improvement on Ultra (87 to 115 FPS), which is less than proportional. This indicates the i5-14600K’s single-core boost of 5.30 GHz is now a limiting factor, though its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 and Passmark single-thread score of 4270 demonstrate strong per-thread capability. The Low settings at 1080p hit 248.9 FPS, but the gap between Medium (175.3) and High (157.3) suggests the GPU is still doing meaningful work.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K): The data shows a clear hierarchy across settings. Low settings produce 120.3 FPS, which is the only preset at this resolution exceeding 100 FPS. Medium yields 81.8 FPS, High drops to 73.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 53.6 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 8.5 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 19.7 FPS, indicating that Ultra’s settings introduce a disproportionately heavy load. All presets except Ultra remain above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

2560x1440 (1440p): This resolution shows the widest spread of results. Low settings achieve 181.4 FPS, Medium produces 128 FPS, High delivers 111.6 FPS, and Ultra maintains 87 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium represents a 53.4 FPS drop, which is the largest single-step reduction in the entire dataset. From Medium to High, the drop is 16.4 FPS, and from High to Ultra, it is 24.6 FPS. Every preset at this resolution clears 60 FPS, making 1440p fully playable across all settings.

1920x1080 (1080p): This resolution delivers the highest absolute frame rates. Low settings hit 248.9 FPS, Medium achieves 175.3 FPS, High produces 157.3 FPS, and Ultra maintains 115 FPS. The differences between presets are 73.6 FPS (Low to Medium), 18 FPS (Medium to High), and 42.3 FPS (High to Ultra). The Low preset’s 248.9 FPS is more than double the 4K High result of 73.3 FPS, highlighting the massive scaling potential at lower resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the Intel Core i5-14600K, the nearest rivals in average benchmark score are extremely close, with deltas under 1%. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, which is 0.2% lower than the i5-14600K’s 48618 average, making it functionally equivalent in synthetic workloads. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, a 0.3% difference, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, a 0.7% gap. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 sits at 48995, which is 0.8% higher. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates, as the game’s CPU demands are well within the capabilities of all four processors.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, the nearest rivals show surprisingly small deltas given the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, just 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, also 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, a 0.4% difference, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, also 0.4% lower. These results are counterintuitive given the RTX 3080’s 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth, but the benchmark averages suggest that in aggregate workloads, these alternatives perform within a rounding error. For Lockdown Protocol, this means users with any of these GPUs would see nearly identical FPS at the same settings, though the RTX 3080’s ray tracing capabilities (68 RT cores) may provide advantages in other titles.

The Verdict

This system can run Lockdown Protocol at all tested resolutions, with clear verdicts per resolution. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best choice at 73.3 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 53.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets — High, Low, Medium, and Ultra — are playable, with Ultra delivering 87 FPS as the best setting. At 1920x1080, the same holds true: all presets clear 60 FPS, and Ultra at 115 FPS is the recommended configuration. The system’s rank of 1057 out of 3714 combos (top 28%) confirms its position as a solid performer, though not an elite one. The data shows that 4K Ultra is the only configuration that fails the 60 FPS test, which is a minor limitation given that the rest of the settings matrix is comfortably playable.

FAQ

Q: What is the best setting for 4K gaming on this system?

A: The best playable setting at 3840x2160 is High, which achieves an average of 73.3 FPS. Ultra falls below the 60 FPS threshold at 53.6 FPS, so it is not recommended.

Q: Can this PC handle 1440p at maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset produces 87 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets at this resolution are playable.

Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K on the same settings?

A: At High settings, 1080p delivers 157.3 FPS versus 73.3 FPS at 4K, a difference of 84 FPS. At Low settings, 1080p hits 248.9 FPS versus 120.3 FPS at 4K, a 128.6 FPS gap.

Q: Which component is more important for this game at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes more significant, as the frame rate scaling from 1440p is less than proportional to the pixel reduction. The i5-14600K’s 5.30 GHz boost clock and 4270 Passmark single-thread score are key factors in sustaining high FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 3080’s 10 GB memory sufficient for 4K Ultra?

A: No. The 4K Ultra preset drops to 53.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The 10 GB GDDR6X frame buffer and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for this specific workload at maximum settings.

Q: How does this system compare to alternatives in its performance class?

A: The CPU’s nearest rivals (Xeon Gold 5318H, EPYC 4345P, Core Ultra 5 245HX, Core Ultra 5 245) all score within 0.8% of the i5-14600K. The GPU’s nearest rivals (P106-100, Radeon Pro Vega 16, RX 6600M, R9 M290X) are within 0.4% of the RTX 3080’s average benchmark score, suggesting similar gaming performance.