Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Lockdown Protocol
FPS 2024

Lockdown Protocol

50%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
114 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
55 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
84 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
38 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
51 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
13.9ms Frame Time
21ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 48,618
Graphics Card
Required 27,646
Your GPU 0

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Available

Your GPU supports ray tracing but may impact FPS.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 35 40 51
1440p QHD 38 53 61 84
1080p Full HD 55 72 79 114

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 72
1920x1080 Low 114
1920x1080 Medium 79
1920x1080 Ultra 55
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 84
2560x1440 Medium 61
2560x1440 Ultra 38
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 51
3840x2160 Medium 40
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Lockdown Protocol on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB combination delivers a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p in Lockdown Protocol, but the 4 GB graphics card becomes the decisive limiting factor at 4K, where no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. Benchmark measurements place this pairing at rank 3239 out of 3714 tested combos for this title, indicating a mid-to-lower-tier standing among all hardware configurations evaluated in this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, with an average of 72.3 FPS. This leaves headroom above the playability threshold, but Ultra drops to 54.8 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. Low settings at 1080p reach 114.3 FPS, and Medium achieves 79.2 FPS, both clearing the threshold with additional margin.

Moving to 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, averaging 60.7 FPS. This sits right at the edge of the 60 FPS threshold, making it the highest-quality setting that remains playable at this resolution. Low at 1440p produces 83.9 FPS, which offers a smoother experience if visual fidelity is less important, while High drops to 52.6 FPS and Ultra falls to 38 FPS, both below the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The closest option is Low at 51.2 FPS, followed by Medium at 40.1 FPS, High at 34.9 FPS, and Ultra at 26.5 FPS. Since the verdict data lists no playable settings for 4K, there is no recommended preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution. Users targeting 4K would need to accept sub-60 FPS performance or reduce resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-14600K posts an average benchmark score of 48618, which places it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in overall processor performance include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H with an average score of 48698, just 0.2% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48470, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, a 0.7% deficit, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 reaches 48995, representing a 0.8% advantage over the i5-14600K.

These four processors bracket the i5-14600K within a narrow performance band of roughly 1.5% total spread. For Lockdown Protocol specifically, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame pacing and CPU-bound behavior, meaning the choice among them would have minimal impact on the measured FPS results in this game. The GPU, rather than the CPU, dominates the performance profile at all resolutions tested.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB has no nearest rivals listed in the data, and its own benchmark score is listed as zero with a 50th percentile standing among all GPUs. This lack of comparative data means no direct GPU alternatives can be cited from the fact pack. However, the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and 128-bit bus width are notable characteristics that influence its behavior in Lockdown Protocol, particularly at higher resolutions where memory pressure increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full settings ladder shows a clear progression. Low settings deliver 114.3 FPS average, Medium reaches 79.2 FPS, High produces 72.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 54.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 35.1 FPS, while the step from Medium to High is only 6.9 FPS, and High to Ultra costs another 17.5 FPS. This pattern suggests diminishing returns from Low to High, followed by a steep penalty when enabling Ultra presets.

The 2560x1440 results follow a similar shape but at lower absolute levels. Low averages 83.9 FPS, Medium hits 60.7 FPS, High falls to 52.6 FPS, and Ultra manages only 38 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium costs 23.2 FPS, Medium to High costs 8.1 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 14.6 FPS. At this resolution, the Medium preset sits precisely at the 60 FPS threshold, making it the boundary between playable and non-playable configurations.

At 3840x2160, performance degrades substantially across all presets. Low averages 51.2 FPS, Medium drops to 40.1 FPS, High reaches 34.9 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 26.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 11.1 FPS, Medium to High is 5.2 FPS, and High to Ultra is 8.4 FPS. None of these values approach the 60 FPS threshold, and even the lowest settings fall nearly 9 FPS short of playability.

Comparing resolutions at the same preset, the scaling is steep. At Low settings, 1080p yields 114.3 FPS, 1440p drops to 83.9 FPS (a 26.6% reduction), and 4K falls to 51.2 FPS (a 39% reduction from 1440p). At High settings, the pattern holds: 72.3 FPS at 1080p, 52.6 FPS at 1440p, and 34.9 FPS at 4K. The resolution scaling is consistent across presets, indicating that pixel count drives the performance differences more than preset-specific effects.

The Verdict

This PC can run Lockdown Protocol at 1920x1080 with High settings, achieving an average of 72.3 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 12.3 FPS margin. The verdict data lists High, Low, and Medium as playable settings at 1080p, with High being the best quality option among them. Ultra at 1080p is not playable, as its 54.8 FPS average falls 5.2 FPS below the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on Low and Medium presets, with Medium at 60.7 FPS being the best visual quality that maintains playability. This is a narrow margin of just 0.7 FPS above the threshold, so any in-game scene with heavier load could push it below 60 FPS. High and Ultra at 1440p are not playable, with averages of 52.6 FPS and 38 FPS respectively.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: no settings preset is playable. The best case, Low at 51.2 FPS, still falls 8.8 FPS short of the 60 FPS target. This combination cannot deliver a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K in Lockdown Protocol under any tested settings configuration. Users with 4K displays would need to lower the resolution to 1440p or 1080p to achieve playable frame rates.

Overall, the system provides a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, with 1080p High being the recommended configuration for the best balance of visual quality and frame rate. The 4 GB VRAM capacity and the GPU's overall performance level are the primary constraints preventing higher preset usage and 4K playability.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals that the GPU dominates the performance profile in Lockdown Protocol across all resolutions and presets. The CPU, Intel Core i5-14600K, ranks at the 90th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 48618, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This massive gap in relative standing indicates that the RTX 3050 4 GB is the bottleneck in this pairing.

Evidence from the measured FPS values supports this conclusion. At 1080p Low, the system produces 114.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold but still far below what a high-end GPU could achieve with the same CPU. The consistent performance drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p (roughly 27-30% lower across presets) and from 1440p to 4K (roughly 35-40% lower) aligns with GPU-bound scaling, where frame rate inversely correlates with pixel count.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and lower presets, where the frame rate ceiling is higher. At 1080p Low with 114.3 FPS, the CPU must feed frames fast enough to keep pace, but the i5-14600K's strong multi-threaded performance—evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and Geekbench multi-core score of 16673—ensures it is not the limiting factor. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX and AMD EPYC 4345P, show performance within 0.7% of the i5-14600K, so any of these CPUs would produce similar results in this game.

At 4K, the GPU's limitation is starkest. Even at Low settings, the average FPS is 51.2, which is 63.4% lower than the 1080p Low result of 114.3 FPS. This steep drop cannot be attributed to CPU limitations, as the CPU workload does not scale with resolution in the same way. The 4 GB memory capacity and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth of the RTX 3050 4 GB are likely contributors, as higher resolutions demand more memory bandwidth and capacity.

The scaling between presets also points to GPU dominance. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 59.5 FPS (from 114.3 to 54.8), while at 1440p the same preset gap is 45.9 FPS (from 83.9 to 38), and at 4K it is 24.7 FPS (from 51.2 to 26.5). The shrinking absolute delta at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is already saturated, so preset changes have less impact on absolute frame rate. The CPU's independent benchmarks, including a Passmark single-thread score of 4270 and multi-thread score of 38682, confirm it has ample headroom for this game's demands.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB combination ranks 3239 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the lower 13% of all configurations evaluated. This ranking reflects the GPU's modest performance level, as the CPU alone sits in the 90th percentile among all processors.

The combo's standing is consistent with its measured performance. At 1080p, it achieves playable frame rates on three of four presets, which is competitive for entry-level hardware but far from top-tier. At 1440p, playability is limited to two presets with the best option barely clearing 60 FPS. At 4K, no preset is playable, which is typical for a GPU with 4 GB of memory and a 128-bit bus.

Given that 3714 combos were tested, the 3239 rank suggests that most other configurations deliver either higher frame rates at the same settings or playable performance at higher resolutions and presets. The GPU's 50th percentile standing among all GPUs, combined with its end-of-life production status and 4 GB memory capacity, explains why this combo trails the field. The CPU contributes positively to the pairing's performance, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations in a GPU-bound title like Lockdown Protocol.

For context, the CPU's nearest rivals—the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, AMD EPYC 4345P, Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, and Intel Core Ultra 5 245—all have average scores within 0.8% of the i5-14600K, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the same GPU would produce nearly identical results and occupy a similar rank. The ranking is therefore driven primarily by the GPU choice, and users seeking better performance in Lockdown Protocol would need to upgrade the graphics card rather than the processor.